In 1984, Burton and Ingold5 suggested that â-CAR
scavenges peroxyl radicals by addition to the conjugated
system of double bonds, yielding a resonance-stabilized
carbon-centered radical (ROOCAR•). They presented evi-
dence that â-CAR functions as a very effective chain-
breaking antioxidant, but as oxygen pressure is increased the
effectiveness of â-CAR as an antioxidant is reduced. The
reversible reaction of resonance-stabilized radicals (e.g.,
ROOCAR•) with oxygen to generate potential chain-carrying
peroxyl radicals (ROOCAROO•) was postulated (Scheme S1,
Supporting Information).
much longer lived, lasting tens to hundreds of milliseconds
rather than hundreds of microseconds as in the case of
carotenoid radicals derived from acylperoxyl radical addition
to carotenoids. The carotenoids studied are shown in Figure
1. Studies of the addition reactions of thiyl radicals with
Effective chain-breaking antioxidants (e.g., R-tocopherol)
are characterized by potent radical-scavenging properties
coupled with poor chain-carrying properties of the antioxi-
dant-derived radical that reflect its lack of reactivity toward
oxygen.6 The radical scavenging properties of carotenoids
in the context of their antioxidant properties have been the
subject of numerous studies.7 However, the reaction of
carotenoid-derived carbon-centered neutral radicals (e.g.,
ROOCAR•) with oxygen has not previously been directly
observed. However, reported rate constants for the reaction
of oleate (n ) 1) and linoleate (n ) 2) radicals with oxygen
are 1 and 0.3 × 109 M-1 s-1, respectively, suggesting that
the rate constant for the reaction with oxygen decreases as
the number (n) of conjugated double bonds in the free radical
increases.1b
Figure 1. Structures of carotenoids used in this study.
carotenoids have been reported previously; however, the
influence of oxygen concentration on the decay kinetics of
the addition radicals has not been investigated.8
Laser photolysis (355 nm) of phenyl disulfide (PhS-SPh)
in benzene forms phenylthiyl radicals (PhS•), which exhibit
a broad absorption band in the 400-500 nm region and decay
by second-order kinetics (see Figures S1 and S2 and eq 1)
with a first half-life of ∼50 µs at room temperature under
our experimental conditions (i.e., for a laser energy of ∼1
mJ). The decay of PhS• is not influenced by oxygen9 in the
range of oxygen concentrations used in this study (up to
∼0.01 M).
Previously we studied the influence of oxygen on the decay
of carotenoid-derived carbon-centered neutral radicals gener-
ated by reaction of the carotenoid with acylperoxyl radicals.7a
However, the carotenoid-derived radicals formed in such
reactions undergo unimolecular SHi (epoxidation) processes
with rate constants around 4 × 103 s-1, and we were not
able to detect any influence of oxygen on the decay of such
radicals using oxygen concentrations up to ∼10-2 M,
suggesting that rate constants for reaction with oxygen do
not exceed 105 M-1 s-1 for these carotenoid addition radicals.
PhS-SPh {hν
\
} 2 PhS•
(1)
In this letter we report the results of laser flash photolysis
experiments in which we have studied the influence of
oxygen on the decay rates of carotenoid-derived carbon-
centered neutral radicals generated from reaction of the
carotenoids with phenylthiyl radicals (PhS•) in benzene. Such
carotenoid radicals do not undergo SHi decay and thus are
Laser photolysis (355 nm) of benzene solutions of ca.
10-3-10-2 M PhS-SPh in the presence of ∼2 × 10-5
M
77DH leads to the formation (on a microsecond time scale)
of an exceptionally intense transient visible absorption band
around 470 nm (Figure S3) attributed to PhS-77DH•, which
is spectrally similar to the transient absorption band observed
for addition radicals formed in the reaction of 77DH with
acylperoxyl radicals (465 nm in benzene),7a suggesting a
common site of attack for acylperoxyl and phenylthiyl
radicals. Although a number of addition sites are possible
for PhS• addition to carotenoids, terminal addition is likely
to be favored as a result of the extensive conjugation within
(4) (a) Pratt, D. A.; Mills, J. H.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 5801. (b) Yin, H. Y.; Havrilla, C. M.; Morrow, J. D.; Porter, N. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7745. (c) Tallman, K. A.; Pratt, D. A.; Porter
N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11827. (d) Lowe, J. R.; Porter, N. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11534. (e) Porter, N. A.; Caldwell, S. E.;
Mills, K. A. Lipids 1995, 30, 277. (f) Porter N. A.; Mills, K. A.; Carter, R.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6690. (g) Boyd, S. L.; Boyd, R. J.; Shi,
Z.; Barclay, L. R. C.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 687. (h)
Porter, N. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 262.
(5) Burton, G. W.; Ingold, K. U. Science 1984, 224, 569.
(6) Doba, T.; Burton, G. W.; Ingold, K. U.; Matsuo, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1984, 461.
(7) (a) El-Agamey, A.; McGarvey, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
3330. (b) Mortensen, A.; Skibsted, L. H.; Truscott, T. G. Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 2001, 385, 13. (c) Edge, R.; McGarvey, D. J.; Truscott, T. G. J.
Photochem. Photobiol., B 1997, 41, 189. (d) Rice-Evans, C. A.; Sampson,
J.; Bramley, P. M.; Holloway, D. E. Free Radical Res. 1997, 26, 381. (e)
Mortensen, A.; Skibsted, L. H. Free Radical Res. 1996, 25, 515. (f)
Mortensen, A.; Skibsted, L. H. Free Radical Res. 1996, 25, 355. (g) Hill,
T. J.; Land, E. J.; McGarvey, D. J.; Schalch, W.; Tinkler, J. H.; Truscott,
T. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8322.
(8) (a) D’Aquino, M.; Dunster, C.; Willson, R. L. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 1989, 161, 1199. (b) Everett, S. A.; Dennis, M. F.; Patel, K.
B.; Maddix, S.; Kundu, S. C.; Willson, R. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271,
3988. (c) Mortensen, A.; Skibsted, L. H.; Sampson, J.; Rice-Evans, C.;
Everett, S. A. FEBS Lett. 1997, 418, 91. (d) Mortensen, A. Asian Chem.
Lett. 2000, 4, 135.
(9) Ito, O. In S-Centered Radicals; Alfassi, Z. B., Ed., John Wiley &
Sons: Chichester, 1999; pp 193-224.
3958
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 18, 2005