Y.-Z. Tan et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 17 (2016) 177–180
179
correlation (Fig. 1) from anomeric proton dH 4.33 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz)
to C-2 (dC 80.4). A detailed analysis of HMQC, HMBC and 1H-1H
COSY spectrum (Fig.1) supported the assignment of all protons and
carbon signals. The relative configuration of 2 was established by
Preparative TLC was conducted with glass plates precoated silica
gel GF254 (Yantai). TLC was carried out with GF254 plates (Qingdao
Marine Chemical Factory). Spots were visualized by spraying with
10% H2SO4 in 95% EtOH followed by heating. Column chromatog-
raphy (CC) was performed with silica gel and Sephadex LH-20. All
the solvent used were of analytical grade.
the NOESY experiment. The NOESY correlations of H-1
with H-3 (dH 1.48), H-15 (dH 0.89) with H-3 (dH 1.48), H-8 (dH 1.96)
with H-15 (dH 0.89) and H-14 (dH 1.17) with H-1 dH 2.05). The
a (dH 2.05)
a
(
relative configuration of 2 was the same as that of valeriananoid B
and detailed comparison of the 1H NMR coupling constants of 2
with valeriananoid B (Mathela et al., 2005). Consequently, 2 was
defined and named as valeriananoid F.
3.2. Plant material
The root of Valeriana jatamansi Jones was collected in June of
2014 from the medicinal herbs market in Chengdu, Sichuan
Province, China. The medical material identity was verified by Prof.
Min Li (Chengdu University of TCM, Sichuan, China). A voucher
specimen (ZZX-1407) was deposited at the School of Pharmacy,
Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, China.
In addition to the two new compounds 1 and 2, the known
iridoids and sesquiterpenoid were identified by comparison of
spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature as 8-
methoxy-3-methoxy-10-methylene-2,9-dioxatricyclo[4.3.1.03,7
]
decan-4-ol (3) (Inouye et al., 1974), vibutinal (4) (Liu et al., 2010),
baldrinal (5) (Chen et al., 2005),11-ethoxyviburtinal (6) (Boros and
Stermitz, 1991), jatamanvaltrate E (7) (Lin et al., 2009), jataman-
valtrate A (8) (Lin et al., 2009), jatamanvaltrate F (9) (Lin et al.,
2009), valeriotetrate C (10) (Lin et al., 2010), chlorovaltrate A (11)
(Lin et al., 2013).
3.3. Extraction, isolation and characterization of compounds
The air-dried roots of Valeriana jatamansi Jones (5 kg), was
powdered and exhaustively extracted using by percolating with
75% EtOH (3 ꢃ 30 L). The combined extract was concentrated under
reduced pressure to dryness. The residue was suspended in water
(2 L) and then the successively partitioned with Petroleum Ether
(3 ꢃ 2 L), EtOAc (3 ꢃ 2 L)and n-BuOH (3 ꢃ 2 L). The EtOAc extract
(170 g) was subjected to CC over silica gel and eluted with a
gradient of CHCl3-MeOH [95:5; 90:10; 85:15; 80:20; 75:25; 70:30;
60:40; 50:50; MeOH] to afford nine fractions A-I. Fraction D (3 g)
and E (4 g) were separated by MHPLC (3.6 cm ꢃ 46 cm, ODS, 10 mL/
min, 6 h), eluted with 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100% MeOH-
H2O to afford about 7 subfractions respectively. The fraction D4
(847 mg) was chromatographed over Sephadex LH-20 eluted with
MeOH as mobile phase to give three subfractions. Successive
separation of the D4-2 (85 mg) by preparative TLC with CHCl3-
MeOH (4:1, v/v) to yield 1 (11.5 mg). The subfraction D4-3 (127 mg)
was separated by preparative TLC with Pe-EtOAc (15:1, v/v) to yield
4 (15.4 mg) and 5 (10.7 mg). Fraction D5 (215 mg)was further
purified by CC over Sephadex LH-20 eluted with MeOH-H2O (9:1, v/
v) as mobile phase to give five subfractions. The subfraction D5-2
(58 mg) was purified by preparative TLC with petroleum ether-
EtOAc (20:1, v/v) to 7 (11.2 mg). The Fraction D5-3 (48 mg)was
purified by preparative HPLC using 75% MeOH-H2O (3 mL/min) as
mobile phase to afford 2 (8.8 mg) and 6 (6.7 mg). At last, Fraction
D5-4 (45 mg) was purified by preparative HPLC using 70% MeOH-
H2O (3 mL/min) as mobile phase to afford 10 (10.5 mg), 11(8.5 mg).
Fraction E3 (86 mg) was purified by preparative HPLC using 75%
MeOH-H2O (3 mL/min) as mobile phase to yield 3 (7.5 mg) and 8
(10.5 mg). The fraction E4 (118 mg) was chromatographed over
Sephadex LH-20 eluted with MeOH as mobile phase to give four
subfractions. The subfraction E4-3 (50 mg) was purified by
preparative TLC with petroleum ether-EtOAc (10:1,v/v) to yield 9
(12.5 mg).
The neuroprotective effects of the compounds against CoCl2-
induced neuronal cell death in PC12 cells were investigated by an
established CCK-8 assay. At the concentrations of 0.1
mM, 1 mM,
10 M, compound 1 and 4 showed potent neuroprotective effects.
m
Compound 1 increased the cell viability from 56.1% to 60.9%, 63.4%
and 65.4%, respectively. For compound 4, the weak neuroprotective
activities were exhibited with the viability by 60.4% only with the
concentrations of 10
inactive even at the high concentrations of 10
m
M. However, the other compounds were
M. CCK-8 assay
m
indicated that all of the compounds had no significant cytotoxicity
to the PC12 cells at their effective concentration required for
neuroprotective effects (data not shown).
In the course of our survey on pharmacologically active
substances in Chinese herb medcine, much attention has been
paid to the occurrence of compounds with neuroprotective effects,
since these compounds are expected to be potentially useful for the
treatment and prevention of Parkinson's disease (PD). During our
search for new types of natural products possessing neuro-
protective activities, we investigated the chemical constituents of
the roots of V. jatamansi, of which the ethylacetate fractions
showed moderate neuroprotective effects. By bioactivity-guided
isolation, we isolated and identified a new secoiridoid glycoside (1)
and a new sesquiterpenoid glycoside (2) and nine known (3–11)
compounds successfully from the roots of V. jatamansi. This study
discovered secoiridoid and sesquiterpenoid glycoside from Valeri-
ana and first reported the activity of these compounds against
PC12 cell damage. It can be seen that secoiridoid glycoside was
bioactive component in V. jatamansi, which has been used as
neurological disorder drug for thousands of years in East Asia. Of
course, the neuroprotective effect of the secoiridoid aglycone is
also worth of our concern in the further research.
3.3.1. Isopatrinioside (1)
20
Amorphous powder; ½aꢁD ꢀ 15:6ꢂ (c = 0.02, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
3. Experimental
lmax (log e
): 206 (3.87), 220 (3.77); IR (KBr) nmax cmꢀ1: 3400, 2958,
3.1. General experimental procedures
1713, 1605, 1077, 1047; HRESIMS m/z: 471.2204 [M+Na]+ (calcd for
C21 H36 O10Na 471.2206); 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1.
NMR measurements were performed on a Bruker-AVII-600
spectrometer. HRESIMS were obtained using Waters Synapt
G2HDMS. IR spectra were measured by PerkinElmer one FT-IR
spectrometer (KBr). UV spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu UV-
260 spectrophotometer. Optical rotations were measured with
Anton Paar MCP 200. Preparative HPLC was performed on
Shimadazu LC-10AT instrument with an SPD-10AVP detector
3.3.2. Valeriananoid F(2)
20
Amorphous powder; ½aꢁD ꢀ 18:6ꢂ (c = 0.05, MeOH); UV (MeOH)
lmax (loge :
): 209 (3.27), 220 (3.14), 228 (3.16); IR (KBr) nmax cmꢀ1
3414, 2926, 2870, 1574, 1416, 1074, 1045; HRESIMS m/z: 423.2352
[M+Na]+ (calcd for C21H36O7Na 423.2359); 1H and 13C NMR data
see Table 1.
and
a
YMC-Pack ODS-A column (250 mm ꢃ 10 mm,
5 mm).