10.1002/chem.201801008
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
Eu(III) complexes towards NPPs and the magnitude of the
emission spectral response is tunable by making modifications
to the ligand structure. Hydrogen bond donor groups were
introduced into the quinoline units of [Eu.1]+ and [Eu.3]+ to
enhance selectivity towards ATP and ADP over monophosphate
anions. Complex [Eu.3]+, bearing two neutral amide donors,
binds most strongly to ATP (log Ka = 5.8), forming a stable
ternary complex that exhibits intense, long-lived Eu(III)
luminescence. [Eu.3]+ can discriminate effectively between ATP,
ADP and AMP in a competitive aqueous medium that simulates
the complex ionic environment present in cells. The probe
spectroscopy. RP would like to acknowledge the Royal Society
URF.
Keywords: adenosine triphosphate (ATP) • live cell imaging •
anion receptor • lanthanide • luminescence
References:
‡ Anion affinity constants for [Eu.3]+ were determined by plotting the change in
the ratio of the ΔJ = 2/ΔJ = 0 (605–630/575–580 nm) emission bands as a
function of anion concentration.
§ Major ESI mass spectral signals were also obtained for the ternary adducts
of [Eu.4]+ bound to 1 molecule of ATP or GTP (Figures S53 and S54).
provides
a linear, ratiometric emission response that is
proportional to the ratio of ATP/ADP, enabling the enzymatic
hydrolysis of ATP to ADP to be precisely monitored in real-time.
Cellular localization studies revealed that [Eu.3]+ preferentially
stains the mitochondria of mammalian cells, and is retained
within this organelle over extended time periods. We have
shown that [Eu.3]+ can detect an increase in mitochondrial ATP
concentration following treatment of cells with the kinase
inhibitor staurosporine. Additionally, [Eu.3]+ was able to visualize
a rapid decrease in mitochondrial ATP following treatment with
KCN, an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation. Complex [Eu.3]+
offers a several advances in performance compared to existing
ATP-responsive probes, including a luminescence signal that is:
1) sensitive to ATP within the biologically relevant concentration
range (1–5 mM); 2) minimally perturbed by changes in pH,
dissolved oxygen or the presence of protein; and 3) sufficiently
[1]
[2]
[3]
T. Sakamoto, A. Ojida and I. Hamachi, Chem. Commun., 2009, 0, 141-
152.
M. Rajendran, E. Dane, J. Conley, M. Tantama, Biol. Bull. 2016, 231,
73–84.
a) R. D. Fields, B. Stevens, Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23, 625–633; b) M.
P. Abbracchio, G. Burnstock, A. Verkhrastsky, H. Zimmermann, Trends
Neurosci. 2009, 32, 19–84.
S. Seino, T. Miki, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2003, 81,133–176.
a) Y. Kurishita, T. Kohira, A. Ojida and I. Hamachi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 134, 18779–18789; b) D. Maity, M. Li, M. Ehlers and C.
Schmuck, Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 208–211; c) L. Wang, L. Yuan, X.
Zeng, J. Peng, Y. Ni, J. C. Er, W. Xu, B. K. Agrawalla, D. Su, B. Kim
and Y.-T. Chang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1773–1776; d) Z.
Xu, N. J. Singh, J. Lim, J. Pan, H. N. Kim, S. Park, K. S. Kim and J.
Yoon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15528–15533.
a) H. Imamura, K. P. Huynh Nhat, H. Togawa, K. Saito, R. Lino, Y.
Kato-Yamada, T. Nagai, H. Noji. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106,
15651–15656; b) M. Tantama, J. R. Martínez-François, R. Mongeon, G.
Yellen, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2550–2550.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
M. V. Zamaraeva, R. Z. Sabirov, E. Maeno, Y. Ando-Akatsuka, S. V.
Bessonova, Y. Okada, Cell Death Differ. 2005, 12, 1390–1397.
X. Li, X. Guo, L. Cao, Z. Xun, S. Wang, S. Li, Y. Li and G. Yang,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7809–7813.
long-lived
to
avoid
interference
from
UV-induced
autofluorescence arising from biomolecules. Such probes offer a
new versatile tool for studying metabolism and a range of
biological processes involving ATP, with subcellular resolution.
The strategy employed here will be explored further to design
Eu(III) probes capable of monitoring spatio-temporal ATP
dynamics within different cellular compartments, providing a
ratiometric change in emission intensity that is intrinsically
normalized.
J. Berg, Y. P. Hung, G. Yellen, Nature Methods, 2009, 6, 161–166.
[10] a) S. E. Schneider, S. N. O'Neil, E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 542–543; b) A. Ojida, S.-k. Park, Y. Mito-oka and I. Hamachi,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6193–6195; c) K. M. K. Swamy, S. K.
Kwon, H. N. Lee, S. M. S. Kumar, J. S. Kim and J. Yoon, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2007, 48, 8683–8686; d) A. Sreenivasa Rao, D. Kim, H. Nam, H.
Jo, K. H. Kim, C. Ban and K. H. Ahn, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3206–
3208; e) A. Ojida, I. Takashima, T. Kohira, H. Nonaka and I. Hamachi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12095–12101; f) X. Liu, H. T. Ngo, Z.
Ge, S. J. Butler and K. A. Jolliffe, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1680–1686; g) Y.
Zhou, Z. Xu and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2222–2235.
[11] N. M. Cordina, N. Sayyadi, L. M. Parker, A. Everest-Dass, L. J. Brown,
and N. H. Packer, Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4521.
Experimental Section
[12] T. W. Traut, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1994, 140, 1–22.
[13] S. J. Butler, D. Parker, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1652–1666.
[14] a) M. C. Heffern, L. M. Matosziuk and T. J. Meade, Chem. Rev. 2014,
114, 4496–4539; b) C. P. Montgomery, B. S. Murray, E. J. New, R. Pal
and D. Parker, Acc. Chem. Res., 2009, 42, 925–937; c) M. P. Coogan
and V. Fernandez-Moreira, Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 384–399; d) P.
R. Selvin, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2002, 31, 275–302; e)
J.-C. G. Bünzli, J. Lumin., 2016, 170, 866–878; f) A. J. Amoroso and S.
J. Pope, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 4723–4742.
[15] J. W. Walton, A. Bourdolle, S. J. Butler, M. Soulie, M. Delbianco, B. K.
McMahon, R. Pal, H. Puschmann, J. M. Zwier, L. Lamarque, O. Maury,
C. Andraud and D. Parker, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 1600–1602.
[16] S. J. Butler, L. Lamarque, R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. Sci. 2014, 5,
1750–1755.
Comprehensive experimental details are provided in the
supporting information, including: details of compound
characterization, UV-Vis and emission spectral data for [Eu.1–
4]+, luminescence titration experiments involving [Eu.1–4]+ and
NPP anions (conducted in buffered aqueous solution and
competitive aqueous media), pH dependence of the emission
profile of [Eu.3]+, ICP-MS data, cellular imaging analysis and
selected LSCM images of [Eu.3]+ in NIH-3T3 cells.
[17] a) G. Vereb, E. Jares-Erijman, P. R. Selvin and T. M. Jovin, Biophys. J.,
1998,74, 2210–2222.; b) S. Faulkner, S. J. A. Pope and B. P. Burton-
Pye, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 2005, 40, 1–31; c) S. Petoud, G. Muller, E.
G. Moore, J. Xu, J. Sokolnicki, J. P. Riehl, U. N. Le, S. M. Cohen and K.
N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 77–83.
[18] a) E. G. Moore, A. P. S. Samuel and K. N. Raymond, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2009, 42, 542–552; b) J.-C. G. Bünzli, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2015, 293-
294, 19–47; c) S. V. Eliseeva and J.-C. G. Bünzli, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2010, 39, 189–227.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Seed Award
(204500/Z/16/Z) and a Royal Society of Chemistry Research
Grant. SJB would like to thank Dr. David Worrall for use of
fluorescence spectroscopy facilities, Dr. Mark Edgar and Dr.
Alan Kenwright (Durham University) for support with NMR
[19] a) D. G. Smith, R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. - Eur. J. 2012, 18, 11604–
11613; b) S. J. Butler, B. K. McMahon, R. Pal, D. Parker and J. W.
Walton, Chem. - Eur. J. 2013, 19, 9511–9517.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.