SCHEME 1. Strategy for the Synthesis of Medium-Sized
Cyclic Ethers by Means of Diene-ene RCM, Employing
Differently Substituted Pentadienyl Ethers as Substrates
Regioselectivity in the Formation of Small- and
Medium-Sized Cyclic Ethers by Diene-Ene
Ring-Closing Metathesis
Sudipta Basu and Herbert Waldmann*
Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r molekulare Physiologie, Otto-Hahn
Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany, and UnVersita¨t
Dortmund, Fachbereich Chemische Biologie, Otto-Hahn-Str. 6,
44227 Dortmund, Germany
the larger dienyl ethers 2 or the smaller monounsaturated ethers
3 was of particular interest.
ReceiVed NoVember 16, 2005
Results and Discussion
The substrates for the decisive ring-closing reaction were
synthesized via aldehyde 6 as the central intermediate, as shown
in Scheme 2. Commercially available oct-1-yne-3-ol 4 was
converted nearly quantitatively to the alkinyl iodide by treatment
with NIS in the presence of AgNO3,4 and the alcohol was then
alkylated by treatment with bromoacetic acid ethyl ester after
deprotonation with NaH.5
Stereoselective reduction of the alkyne to the Z olefin with
diimide prepared in situ gave vinyl iodide 5 in high yield.4,6
After a Stille reaction with vinyltributyl tin, the resulting dienyl
ether was converted into aldehyde 6 in 75% yield by means of
reduction of the ester to the aldehyde with DIBAL-H in diethyl
ether for 20 min at -78 °C. Aldehyde 6 was then converted
into pentadienyl ethers 7, 10, and 13 by means of established
methods (Scheme 2).4,7 Compounds 10 and 13 embody a free
or a protected alcohol to determine a possible influence of a
coordinating group on the course of the ring-closing reaction.
When subjected to RCM with either 10 mol % of first-
generation Grubbs catalyst 16 or 5 mol % of second-generation
catalyst 17 in refluxing dichloromethane (DCM), dienyl allyl
ether 7 yielded the five- and seven-membered cyclic ethers 8
and 9 in a ratio of 2:3. However, under similar conditions, dienyl
homoallyl ether 10 yielded exclusively the six-membered ether
11, and the formation of the eight-membered ring cyclic ether
12 was not observed at all. While the latter result was not
unexpected, the formation of the seven-membered ring in a
nearly equal amount as the five-membered cyclic ether was
surprising. To investigate whether a seven-membered ring was
also formed predominantly in competition to ring closure to a
In the formation of medium-sized ethers by diene-ene ring-
closing metathesis, the formation of cyclic allyl ethers with
a smaller ring size and of pentadienyl ethers with a larger
ring size compete with each other. In the competition
between six- and eight-membered and seven- and nine-
membered ring formation, the smaller rings are formed
exclusively, whereas in the competition between the five-
and seven-membered rings, both products are formed in
comparable amounts.
Seven-, eight-, and nine-membered oxygen heterocycles with
one or two double bonds embedded into the heterocyclic ring
systems are characteristic structural frameworks of various
natural products.1 In the course of a project aimed at the
synthesis of such natural product frameworks, we became
interested in their synthesis, employing the ring-closing me-
tathesis (RCM) reaction as the key transformation.2 In particular,
the diene-ene RCM reaction employing pentadinenyl ethers 1
as substrates (Scheme 1) attracted our interest because it would
give rise to seven- to nine-membered cyclic dienes that would
be amenable to substantial structural variation by means of
various transformations. The diene-ene RCM has been used
several times in natural-product synthesis3 but not for the
synthesis of small- and medium-sized cyclic ethers. In this
context, the regioselectivity of the reaction giving rise to either
(3) (a) Cabrejas, L. M. M.; Rohrbach, S.; Wagner, D.; Kallen, J.; Zenke,
G.; Wagner, J. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2443-2446. (b) Yang,
Z.-Q.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9602-9603 and
the references therein. (c) Biswas, K.; Lin, H.; Njardarson, J. T.; Chappell,
M. D.; Chou, T.-C.; Guan, Y.; Tong, W. P.; He, L.; Horwitz, S. B.;
Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9825-9832. (d) Barluenga,
S.; Lopez, P.; Mpolin, E.; Winssinger, N. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
3467-3470. (e) Evano, G.; Schaus, J. V.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
525-528. (f) Wang, X.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
6040-6041.
(4) (a) Shair, M. D.; Yoon, T.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 3755-3757. (b) Bialy, L.; Waldmann, H. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 1748-1751. (c) Bialy, L.; Waldmann, H. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10,
2759-2780.
* Corresponding author. Fax: (+49) 321-133-2499.
(1) (a) Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1986, 3, 1-33. (b) Himara, M.;
Rainder, J. D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, xi.
(2) (a) Fu, G. C.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5426-
5427. (b) Fu, G. C.; Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 9856-9857. (c) Crimmins, M. T.; Choy, A. L. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 7548-7549. (d) Crimmins, M. T.; Choy, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 5653-5660. (e) Deiters, A.; Martin, S. F. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2199-
2238. (f) Crimmins, M. T.; McDougall, P. J.; Emmitte, K. A. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 4033-4036.
(5) Crimmins, M. T.; DeBaillie, A. C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3009-3011.
(6) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Yang, S.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
15196-15197 (b) Denmark, S. E.; Yang, S.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 12432-12440.
(7) Zhang, A.; RajanBabu, T. V. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3159-3161.
10.1021/jo052367y CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/14/2006
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3977-3979
3977