033309-3
Ha, Akinwande, and Dodabalapur
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 033309 (2012)
sweep of gate voltage from ꢂ70 V to 70 V. The transfer char-
acteristics of a graphene FET are not degraded by depositing
organic semiconductor onto the graphene layer. It can be
noted that the transfer characteristics of hybrid graphene/or-
ganic semiconductor FETs return to its initial state (i.e.,
before organic semiconductor deposition) after removing
a-6T semiconductor layer. The electronic properties of gra-
phene can be tuned favorably using the capping layer of or-
ganic semiconductor.
In order to extract key parameters, a diffusive transport
model based on total resistance of the graphene device was
used.15
L
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
RTOTAL ¼ RCONTACT
þ
;
2
Wel n20 þ n½VGꢃ ꢄ
FIG. 4. The total resistance in single layer graphene and graphene FETs by
capping with F16CuPc along with diffusive transport modeling fit. The inset
shows the chemical structure of F16CuPc.
where l is the field-effect mobility, n[VG*] is the value of the
carrier concentration induced by the gate bias away from the
Dirac point, and no is the density of carriers at the minimum
conductivity point. Figure 2(b) shows there is good agreement
between the experimental data and diffusive transport model.
Optimized graphene/organic semiconductor FETs with a-6T
possess field-effect mobility of 1289 cm2/V s in air, which is
slightly improved from 1176 cm2/V s in single layer graphene
FET without a decrease in the on-off current ratio. The
extracted no is 1012 cmꢂ2 and width-normalized contact resist-
ance is ꢁ1.9 kX lm. Furthermore, removal of the organic
semiconductor layer from graphene FETs results in a return to
the original electronic properties. The results suggest that
there are weak reversible electronic interactions between a-6T
and graphene layers.
In summary, we have investigated hybrid graphene/or-
ganic semiconductor FETs with a-6T and F16CuPc. The
electronic properties of graphene based FETs can be favor-
ably tuned by capping with p-conjugated organic semicon-
ductor molecules, particularly F16CuPc. The off-state current
was reduced while the on-state current and mobility were ei-
ther unaffected or increased. This results from weak reversi-
ble electronic interactions between organic semiconductors
and graphene.
This work is supported by NSF-ECCS under grant
1028184 and an ONR Grant in the program of Dr. Chagaan
Baatar.
The on-off current ratio and the field-effect mobility in a
graphene FET are typically decreased after depositing most
additional layers on graphene.4 Figure 3 shows the transfer
characteristics and the normalized resistance of single layer gra-
phene by capping with a-6T semiconductor layer and with sili-
con dioxide. Compared to silicon dioxide on a graphene FET,
the on-state current ratio in graphene/a-6T FET was improved
from 3 to 5 and on-current was increased by factor of two with-
out degradation in field-effect mobility. It means that weak
interaction between a-6T semiconductor and graphene influen-
ces the electronic characteristics including charge carrier trans-
port, which is obviously distinguished from silicon dioxide.
It has been reported that fluorination of graphene can
dramatically alter its electronic and optical properties,
affording orders of magnitude increase in the resistivity and
opening of a bandgap of several Ev.16,17 The effect of cap-
ping with F16CuPc on graphene FETs was investigated, as
shown in Figure 4. Compared to the plain single layer gra-
phene FET, capping with F16CuPc improved on-off current
ratio from 3 to 5 as well as the field-effect mobility from
1292 to 1367 cm2/V s in air. Furthermore, the Dirac voltage
point was shifted negatively. The value of the extracted no is
decreased from 1.3 ꢅ 1012 to 1.0 ꢅ 1012 cmꢂ2, indicating that
a significant favorable modification of electronic properties
occurs with the introduction of the fluorinated semiconduc-
tor. The exact mechanism is under investigation and will be
reported later.
3M. C. Lemme, T. J. Echtermeyer, M. Baus, and H. Kurz, IEEE Electron
4Y.-M. Lin, H.-Y. Chiu, K. A. Jenkins, D. B. Farmer, P. Avouris, and A.
5S. Y. Zhou, G.-H. Gweon, A. V. Fedorov, P. N. First, W. A. De Heer, D.-
H. Lee, F. Guinea, A. H. Castro Neto, and A. Lanzara, Nature Mater. 6,
770 (2007).
6Z. H. Ni, T. Y. Y. H. Lu, Y. Y. Wang, Y. O. Feng, and Z. X. Shen, ACS
7C. R. Dean, A. F. Young, I. Meric, C. Lee, L. Wang, S. Sorgenfrei, K.
Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Kim, K. L. Shepard, and J. Hone, Nat. Nano-
8F. Xia, D. B. Farmer, Y.-M. Lin, and P. Avouris, Nano Lett. 10, 715
(2010).
10J. Wu, M. Agrawal, H. A. Becerril, Z. Bao, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, and P. Peu-
023304 (2009).
12C.-A. Di, D. Wei, C. Yu, Y. Liu, Y. Guo, and D. Zhu, Adv. Mater. 20,
3289 (2008).
13X. Li, Y. Zhu, W. Cai, M. Borysiak, B. Han, D. Chen, R. D. Piner, L.
Colombo, and R. S. Ruoff, Nano Lett. 9, 4359 (2009).
14B. Crone, A. Dodabalapur, Y.-Y. Lin, R. W. Filas, Z. Bao, A. LaDuca, R.
Sarpeshkar, H. E. Katz, and W. Li, Nature 403, 521 (2000).
15S. Kim, J. Nah, I. Jo, D. Shahrjerdi, L. Colombo, Z. Yao, E. Tutuc, and S.
16J. T. Robinson, J. S. Burgess, C. E. Junkermeier, S. C. Badescu, T. L. Rei-
necke, F. K. Perkins, M. K. Zalautdniov, J. W. Baldwin, J. C. Culbertson,
P. E. Sheehan, and E. S. Snow, Nano Lett. 10, 3001 (2010).
17W. H. Lee, J. W. Suk, H. Chou, J. Lee, Y. Hao, Y. Wu, R. Piner, D. Akin-
wande, K. S. Kim, and R. S. Ruoff, Nano Lett. 12, 2374 (2012).