9954 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 28, 2004
Chtanko et al.
Figure 9. SEM image of a slightly conical Bi wire with D
w
) 289 nm and d ) 90 nm.
w
tipore membranes under the same conditions as with the single-
pore membranes to study the influence of methanol concentra-
tion on pore geometry. After the electrochemical Cu deposition
and dissolution of the membrane in dichloromethane, the conical
wires were imaged with SEM, and the large (Dw) and small
ments with multitrack membranes. Bismuth single wires,
embedded in polymer, can be employed to find a correlation
between diameter and electrical resistance. The creation of single
wires with diameters <100 nm should be achievable with more
hydrophilic polymers.
(
dw) diameters were determined. Figure 7 illustrates that the
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to Dr. P. Yu. Apel for
fruitful discussions and for critically reading this manuscript.
cone angle became larger when increasing the methanol
concentration from 20 to 30%. Furthermore, parts a and b of
Figure 7 show that for the same etching time a higher methanol
concentration resulted in a larger Dw, whereas there was almost
no influence on dw. The latter result was probably due to the
electrostopping effect of a voltage applied between the two
References and Notes
(
(
(
1) Buchachenko, A. Usp. Khim. 2003, 72, 419.
2) Xia, Y.; Yang, P. AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 351.
3) Kiang, C.-H.; Choi, J.-S.; Tran, T. T.; Bacher, A. D. J. Phys. Chem.
1
3
electrodes with the positive potential on the etchant side. We
used the graphs in Figure 7 as calibration curves and indirectly
deduced the geometrical parameters of single wires. Under these
etching conditions, we obtained single conical wires, the
narrowest having dw ) 50 nm and Dw ) 610 nm, as illustrated
in Figure 8. Etching at 50 °C provided pores with a smaller
cone angle (probably due to the partial evaporation of methanol)
than etching at room temperature and, accordingly, slightly
conical wires as shown in Figure 9, with dw ) 90 nm and Dw
B 1999, 103, 7449.
(4) Hulteen, J. C.; Martin, C. R. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 1075.
(
(
(
5) Martin, C. R. Science 1994, 266, 1961.
6) DeSorbo, W. Nucl. Tracks 1979, 3, 13.
7) Toimil Molares, M. E.; Buschmann, V.; Dobrev, D.; Neumann,
R.; Scholz, R.; Schuchert, I. U.; Vetter, J. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 62.
8) Dobrev, D.; Vetter, J.; Angert, N.; Neumann, R. Appl. Phys. A 1999,
9, 233.
9) Reutov, V. F.; Dmitriev, S. N.; Sokhatsky, A. S. Nucl. Instrum.
Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2003, 201, 460.
(
6
(
(
10) Schwanbeck, H.; Schmidt, U. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 4389.
(11) Heremans, J.; Thrush, C. M.; Lin, Y.-M.; Cronin, S.; Zhang, Y.;
)
289 nm. The wires depicted in Figures 8 and 9 resulted from
Dresselhaus, M. S.; Mansfield, J. F. Phys. ReV. B 2000, 61, 4850.
(12) Liu, K.; Chien, C. L.; Searson, P. C.; Zhang, K. Y. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 1998, 73, 1436.
multipore membranes.
(
13) Apel, P. Yu.; Korchev, Yu. E.; Siwy, Z.; Spohr, R.; Yoshida, M.
Summary and Conclusion
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2001, 184, 337.
(14) Dobrev, D.; Neumann, R. GSI Sci. Rep. 2002 2003, 147.
In this work, we aimed at the fabrication of bismuth
nanowires suitable for measurements of electrical properties,
eventually visualizing quantum effects. Different procedures for
the preparation of single metallic nanowires were developed.
Two types of polycarbonate foils were tested as matrixes for
the production of single-ion track templates. The dynamics of
single-pore formation in both materials was studied by electrical
conductivity measurements. The pore geometry was controlled
by the etching mode (one-side or two-side), alkali concentration,
and methanol content in the etching solution. Cylindrical and
conical single pores with diameters between 50 and 400 nm
were filled with Bi by electrochemical deposition. The size and
shape of the conical single pores and wires were determined
by means of SEM from etching and electrodeposition experi-
(
15) Oganessian, V. R.; Trofimov, V. V.; Vetter, J.; Danziger, M.;
D o¨ rschel, B.; Hermsdorf, D. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B
003, 208, 166.
(16) Ferain, E.; Legras, R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B
003, 208, 115.
2
2
2
(17) Ferain, E.; Legras, R. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B
001, 174, 116.
(18) Apel, P. Yu.; Blonskaya, I. V.; Didyk, A. Yu.; Dmitriev, S. N.,
Orelovitch, O. L.; Root, D, Samoilova L. I., Vutsadakis, V. Nucl. Instrum.
Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2001, 179, 55.
(19) De Gennes, P. G. ReV. Mod. Phys. 1985, 57, 827.
(20) Toimil Molares, M. E.; Br o¨ tz, J.; Buschmann, V.; Dobrev, D.;
Neumann, R.; Scholz, R.; Schuchert, I. U.; Trautmann, C.; Vetter, J. Nucl.
Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 2001, 185, 192.
(21) Toimil Molares, M. E.; Chtanko, N.; Cornelius, Th.; Dobrev, D.;
H o¨ hberger, E. M.; Enculescu, I.; Blick, R. H.; Neumann, R. Nanotechnology
2004, 15, 201.