322
A. Iglesias-Juez et al. / Journal of Catalysis 217 (2003) 310–323
The mechanism of the NO-SCR with hydrocarbons
Hydrocarbon activation appears to be a very important
step for silver systems [17,34] and, in fact, the reaction of
an intermediate oxygenate hydrocarbon with the alumina
surface is proposed as the rate-limiting step for supported
tin catalysts [35]. Here, the hydrocarbon is activated in the
presence of oxygen (Fig. 5, 6) initially at the methyl rather
than the vinyl end of the molecule leading to a partial oxida-
tion product with retention of the C=C bond and giving ad-
sorbed acrylate. Oxidation via activation of the vinyl part of
the molecule may give rise to the other carboxylate species,
such as propanoate or ethanoate species. An alternative to
the latter, concurrent scheme would be a consecutive route,
where acrylate interacts with the appropriate acid–base cen-
ters of the alumina surface (consistent with modifications
observed in the hydroxyl region of the infrared spectra in
Figs. 3–5) and evolves in the presence of water with forma-
tion of acetaldehyde (plus formaldehyde) which, in turn, is
subsequently attacked by NO-derived species after the rate-
limiting step [35]. The proximity of surface Al sites (which
act as anchoring sites for acrylate species) and Ag centers
may be another reason for the high activity of the aluminate
phase. As previously noted, consumption of surface hydrox-
yls is particularly significant for 6Ag, a fact which must in-
fluence N-activation (absence of type II nitrates) and should
be considered, together with the presence of Ag(0) under re-
action conditions, as a possible cause for the low selective
reduction of propene with NOx observed for this sample. On
the other hand, formate, acetate, or other carboxylate-related
compounds are fairly unreactive with either NO or O2 alone
but can be removed in NO+O2 gas mixtures [16]. However,
they do not seem to favor or have a negligible contribution
to the coupling of N-species with the subsequent formation
of N2. DRIFTS results show that silver phases are involved
in opening up alternative reaction pathways for hydrocarbon
activation which lead to the generation of acrylate species,
consistent with previous results from our laboratories [18].
Differences between the activities of the alumina alone and
the supported silver samples are most likely related to some
extent to the way in which the hydrocarbon is activated in
each case which, as postulated in studies of partial oxidation
of propene, can be related to the nature of the allyl interme-
diate formed in each case [26]. The silver-related phase may
be involved in supplying the active oxygen species for the
initial partial oxidation step and as shown in Fig. 9 the silver
oxide anion species are in fact more labile for 4.5Ag than
the 1.5Ag, which could then explain the higher NOx reduc-
tion activity of the former (Fig. 1). This may favorably alter
the rate of formation of the hydrocarbon intermediate. It can
be noted, however, that the initial Ag–O distance and coor-
dination numbers of our two active samples are very similar
in the calcined state (as suggested by the EXAFS FTs dis-
played in Fig. 8) and only a very small variation after reac-
tion is detected for the more active 4.5Ag sample. This small
variation in size (and/or shape) could be the origin of the
difference between the oxygen labilities detected for these
two samples. Other parameters such as the number of active
has been extensively studied for silver [5,18,22,25,33,34],
cobalt, and tin [9,35] on alumina samples, and a degree of
similarity in terms of behavior and mechanism is apparent.
It is generally accepted that both the hydrocarbon (propene)
and NO molecules must first be activated by formation of
some oxidized, adsorbed intermediates, typically carboxy-
lates such as acrylate for the hydrocarbon and NO2 or nitrite
and nitrate compounds for NO [5,18,22,25,33–35]. Some of
these activated, intermediate compounds may be present for
the alumina support alone (Figs. 4 and 5), indicating that
the support itself is, as well known, able to promote the SCR
of NOx using hydrocarbons as reducing agents. Silver is
thought to play an important role in modifying the surface
concentration and selectivity among these intermediates, en-
hancing the activity of the carrier. However, the coupling be-
tween these intermediates may occur primarily on the alu-
mina surface and the role of silver in such coupling steps
may be secondary [18,27,35]. It appears, therefore, that the
main role of the metal may be restricted to the initial steps
of the reaction and is mainly related to activation of the reac-
tant molecules, either directly at the silver surface and/or by
the modification of the acid/base (hydroxyls) properties of
alumina (Fig. 3). DRIFTS results (Figs. 3–6) strongly sup-
port a clear role of active silver entities in modifying both
the NO and the propene activation paths.
For NO, there is some evidence (Figs. 4 and 5), that
NO may be activated by interaction with acidic hydroxyls,
thus generating nitrosonium ion (NO+) in a process involv-
ing H+ (originating from the hydroxyls) consumption, as
has been previously postulated for alumina [18] or zeolite-
based systems [36,37]. Some of these NO-derived adsor-
bates are detected at high temperatures under reaction condi-
tions (Figs. 6) and display maximum intensity for the most
active (4.5Ag) sample. As observed in Fig. 4, such acidic
hydroxyls are recovered by interaction with the hydrocar-
bon (or derived products), thus closing the catalytic cycle
and regenerating the active surface species. Alternatively,
nitrosonium ions plus nitrate precursor molecules (nega-
tively charged N-containing molecules) can be simultane-
ously formed by disproportionation reaction of N-dimers
(N2O3, N2O4) [25,37]. An additional pathway for nitrate
formation is, as noted, reaction of NO2(g) and hydroxyls
groups. In any case, in our samples, two types of nitrates
giving bands at ca. 1545–1550 and 1245 cm−1 (type I) and
1580–1590 and 1305 cm−1 (type II) are detected. Both mea-
surements under reaction conditions during a light-off ex-
periment (Fig. 6) and at low, steady-state conversion (Fig. 4)
show the greater activity of type II nitrates. Type II nitrates
are usually ascribed to bidentate species [22,25,26], which
must therefore be considered as the NO-derived active en-
tities which preferentially react with C-containing interme-
diates. Differences between the two active samples in this
respect mainly concern the greater number of type II nitrates
for 4.5Ag, but with no clear difference concerning the ratio
of the N-containing ad-species was detected.