M. Schwidder et al. / Journal of Catalysis 259 (2008) 96–103
97
Free NO2 is a crucial intermediate in the mechanism proposed
previously [17], in which the catalytic role of the iron is confined
to the oxidation of NO and the subsequent fast SCR proceeds ex-
clusively on zeolite Brønsted sites. This mechanism also was sup-
ported by Devadas et al. [7], although they noted a catalytic rele-
vance of the Fe sites in the fast SCR step as well. In recent work
with iron-free catalysts, Sachtler et al. [18] emphasized the forma-
tion of NH4NO2, which is easily formed from NO, NO2, NH3, and
H2O [18]. Its decomposition to nitrogen and water is very rapid
with no catalyst at low temperatures, but enhancement by acidic
sites also has been observed [19].
In our recent work, we investigated the relevance of different
Fe sites in Fe-ZSM-5 for the SCR of NO by ammonia in some
detail, combining structural information from UV–vis, EPR, and
X-ray absorption spectroscopy with catalytic data [20–22]. Accord-
ing to these results, all iron sites present, including isolated Fe
oxo species, can catalyze this reaction, and at low temperatures
(523 K), the reaction rate can even be correlated with the total Fe
content for catalysts with well-dispersed iron. At the same time,
a particular activity contribution of oligomeric clusters was noted,
which would have impeded such correlation at higher tempera-
tures [21].
The present paper reports an attempt to extend this approach
on the fast SCR by studying this reaction over Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts of
different Fe site structures, characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy.
Striking differences in site requirements of fast and standard SCR,
as well as in catalyst durability, indicate that the fast SCR pro-
ceeded on isolated Fe oxo sites, which is further supported by a
successful optimization effort for Fe-ZSM-5 inspired by this con-
clusion. A clear discrepancy between the rates of oxidation and
the selective reduction of NO over the catalysts used suggests no
mechanistic relation between the seemingly similar selective cat-
alytic reduction of NO and of NO/NO2 mixtures.
was redissolved in 1 ml nitric acid, and the liquid was washed
into a volumetric flask containing demineralized water. The UV–
vis spectra of the catalysts in calcined state (heating in synthetic
air to 423 K with 2 K min−1, after a 15 min isothermal period heat-
ing to 873 K with 5 K min−1, followed by 1 h at this temperature)
were recorded with a Cary 400 spectrometer (Varian) equipped
with a diffuse reflectance accessory (Harrick). For light absorption
reduction, samples were diluted with α-Al2O3 (calcined for 4 h at
1473 K) at a ratio of 1:10.
The catalytic data were measured in a catalytic microflow reac-
tor (6 mm i.d.) in the temperature range 423–873 K. In standard
SCR, the feed gas consisted of 1000 ppm NO, 1000 ppm NH3, and
2% oxygen with helium as balance. For fast SCR, 500 ppm NO2
and 500 ppm NO were used instead of 1000 ppm NO. NO2 was
introduced into the feed gas mixture directly before the reactor in-
let, to prevent the formation of ammonium nitrate within the gas
lines. For the NO oxidation reaction, only 1000 ppm and 2% oxy-
gen with helium as balance were used. In all reactions, the space
−1
velocity applied was 750,000 h
(catalyst mass, 10 mg; particle
size, 250–350 μm; total flow rate, 183.3 ml min−1). Conversions
were determined using calibrated mass spectrometry (Balzers QMS
200). The only nitrogen-containing components detected were NO,
NO2, N2, and NH3, N2O was not found in measurable quantities. In
fact, N2O detection is not very sensitive with our analytical scheme
because of rather intense fragmentation, but the N2O selectivity is
known to be low over Fe-ZSM-5 under the conditions applied here
[7,24]. Cross-sensitivities between ammonia and water fragments
(m/z = 17) and between NO and NO2 fragments (m/z = 30) were
eliminated by calibrated fragmentation ratios.
This experimental scheme has two problems. First, at tempera-
tures below 500 K, the measurements may have been influenced
by the formation of ammonium nitrate. The role of ammonium
nitrate in fast SCR is presently under debate. Its formation was
first considered as a side reaction [25], and recently its role as an
intermediate in the fast-SCR reaction sequence over V/W–TiO2 cat-
alysts has been proposed [26]. We discuss the extent of this effect
over our catalysts later in the paper. The observation of white (am-
monium nitrate) powder deposition at inadequately heated reactor
walls near the reactor entrance suggests, however, that this reac-
tion can proceed noncatalyzed and parallel to the main reaction.
Second, mass spectrometry analysis of coexisting NO and NO2 is
prone to experimental errors in the individual concentration of the
oxides, whereas their sum is less affected. Due to the strong frag-
mentation of NO2 in the mass spectrometer, measured conversions
of both NO and NO2 depend critically on the correct intensity mea-
surement of the weak NO2 signal at m/e = 46. Underestimation of
the NO2 signal will result in insufficient correction of the NO in-
tensity, that is, overestimation of residual NO. Thus, errors in NO
and NO2 conversion are complementary, leaving the NOx conver-
sion largely unaffected. The problem disappears when the residual
NO2 concentration tends toward zero, obviously at high tempera-
tures in our experiments. Although evidence also exists suggesting
that the divergence between NO and NO2 conversion may be real
in some cases, for now we assign it to undiscovered changes in
the mass spectrometry conditions, leading to the aforementioned
errors, and confine ourselves to the discussion of total NOx conver-
sion in what follows.
2. Experimental
The ZSM-5 zeolites used had a Si/Al ratio of 14 and were pro-
vided by Chemiewerk Bad Köstritz (Germany; Na-ZSM-5, used for
ILIE and CVD preparations, see below) and by Tricat Zeolites GmbH
Bitterfeld, now Südchemie Bitterfeld GmbH (Germany; NH4-ZSM-
5, for SSIE samples and study with parent zeolite). H-ZSM-5 was
made from these zeolites through standard procedures (i.e., ex-
change with HCl, calcination at 873 K).
The Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts were prepared through various routes.
The improved liquid ion-exchange (ILIE) samples were prepared ac-
cording to a procedure described in detail elsewhere [21]. In brief,
the zeolite was exchanged with Fe2+ generated in situ from iron
powder under an inert gas atmosphere. The chemical vapor de-
position (CVD) sample was prepared as described previously [23],
with the zeolite in the H form exchanged with vaporized FeCl3
under an inert gas atmosphere. The solid-state ion exchange (SSIE)
samples were prepared by heating a mixture of the zeolite in the H
form with a suitable amount of FeCl3 in flowing nitrogen according
to the following protocol. First, the mixture was heated to 423 K
−1
with a temperature ramp of 2 K min
to protect the pore sys-
tem of the zeolite from being destroyed by vaporizing water. Then
−1
the temperature was increased to 573 K at a rate of 5 K min
and maintained there for 1 h. Finally, the sample was washed with
deionized water and dried at ambient atmosphere. In what follows,
we designate the samples based on their preparation method and
their iron content; that is ILIE-0.2 designates a Fe-ZSM-5 prepared
by the ILIE method and containing 0.2 wt% iron.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of Fe-ZSM-5 samples by UV–vis spectroscopy
The Fe content of the samples was analyzed by atomic absorp-
tion spectroscopy. For digestion, 50 mg of each sample was dis-
solved in a mixture of concentrated acids: HNO3 (5 ml), HCl (1 ml),
and HF (1 ml). After evaporation of the acid mixture, the residue
Fig. 1 presents the UV–vis spectra of the Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts
used in this study. The Kubelka–Munk function is plotted in nor-
malized form to facilitate comparison of signal shapes. The spec-
tra differ strongly and indicate a widely varying degree of clus-