Z. Chen et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4980–4983
4983
Table 2
20–35% tumor growth inhibition was observed for the compound
2 at the end, after a 200 mg/kg oral dose. No significant tumor
growth inhibition was found by using compound 16k at a 50 mg/
kg po dose even though 16k is threefolds more potent than 2,
against the 22C11 and 33.13 cell lines. These results were surpris-
ing given the excellent exposures of compounds 2 and 16k in tu-
mor bearing nude mice (Table 3). Another related experiment
showed that there were no major pathway-related gene changes
in 2 and 16k treated tumors, while these changes were observed
in in vitro gene chip analyses. The reason for this disconnection
is not clear.
In summary, initial SAR exploration of the lead diamino-quinaz-
oline has led to a number of potent in vitro inhibitors of the b-cate-
nin/Tcf-4 pathway with improved in vivo pharmacokinetic
properties. Compound 16k exhibited improved potency (IC50
0.22 lM against the 22C11 cell line and 0.19 lM against the
33.13 cell line), good solubility, permeability and oral bioavailabil-
Activity of different substitutions on the piperidine ringa
b
Compds
R
22C11 IC50
M)
33.13 IC50
M)
5A8 IC50
M)
(
l
(
l
(l
16a
16b
16c
16d
16e
16f
16g
16h
16i
16j
16k
16l
16m
16n
16o
Me
iPr-CH2
n-Butyl
Cyclohexyl
1.92
0.65
1.47
0.75
0.76
1.83
>20
1.18
0.47
0.52
0.22
0.53
0.33
0.39
0.57
1.67
0.96
1.17
0.81
0.85
1.93
>20
0.90
0.50
0.45
0.19
0.32
0.35
0.32
0.41
>17.3
>10.5
>10.5
>8.32
>4.82
>20
Boc
2-Furanylmethyl
2-Imidazolylmethyl
4-Pyridinylmethyl
4-Methylbenzyl
4-Methoxybenzyl
4-Fluorobenzyl
2-Fluorobenzyl
3-Fluorobenzyl
4-Chlorobenzyl
(5-Chloropyridin-2-
yl)methyl
>20
>8.07
>4.15
>6.18
>4.82
>6.67
>4.17
>3.18
>5.40
ity (46%), and showed excellent blood and tumor exposure, follow-
16p
2-Chloro-4-fluorobenzyl 0.52
0.21
>5.91
ing oral dosage. However, neither compound
2 nor 16k
a
Values are means of at least two experiments.
The number reported behind the ‘>’ sign indicates the minimal toxic dose at
demonstrated significant in vivo efficacy in HT29 and HCT116
xenograft models. Further optimization in potency and PK proper-
ties of this series is ongoing, and the results will be reported in due
course.
b
which cells started to be killed due to toxicity, as indicated by the Renilla luciferase
signal.
Table 3
Plasma and tumor concentrations of compounds 2 and 16k
Acknowledgment
Compds Dose (po,
mg/kg)
Plasma conc. 8 h
(ng/mL)
Tumor conc. 8 h
(ng/mL)
Tumor/
plasma ratio
We thank Wyeth Chemical Technologies Department for com-
pound identification and the pharmaceutical profiling results.
2
200
50
2973
440
90,736
70,306
40
220
16k
References and notes
1. (a) Percy, C.; Stanek, E., 3rd; Gloeckler, L. Am. J. Pub. Health 1981, 71, 242; (b)
Lepourcelet, M.; Chen, Y.-N. P.; France, D. S.; Wang, H.; Crews, P.; Petersen, F.;
Bruseo, C.; Wood, A. W.; Shivdasani, R. A. Cancer Cell 2004, 5, 91.
2. Kinzler, K. W.; Vogelstein, B. Cell 1996, 87, 159.
3. Oving, I. M.; Clevers, H. C. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 32, 448.
4. Rijsewijk, F.; Schuermann, M.; Wagenaar, E.; Parren, P.; Weigel, D.; Nusse, R.
Cell 1987, 50, 649.
5. (a) Morin, P. J.; Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93,
7950; (b) Nelson, W. J.; Nusse, R. Science 2004, 303, 1483.
6. Clevers, H. Cell 2006, 127, 469.
7. He, T. C.; Sparks, A. B.; Rago, C.; Hermeking, H.; Zawel, L.; da Costa, L. T.; Morin,
P. J.; Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K. W. Science 1998, 281, 1509.
8. Tetsu, O.; McCormick, F. Nature 1999, 398, 422.
9. Jho, E. H.; Zhang, T.; Domon, C.; Joo, C. K.; Freund, J. N.; Costantini, F. Mol. Cel.
Biol. 2002, 22, 1172.
10. Liu, W.; Dong, X.; Mai, M.; Seelan, R. S.; Taniguchi, K.; Krishnadath, K. K.;
Halling, K. C.; Cunningham, J. M.; Boardman, L. A.; Qian, C.; Christensen, E.;
Schmidt, S. S.; Roche, P. C.; Smith, D. I.; Thibodeau, S. N. Nat. genet. 2000, 26,
146.
11. Polakis, P. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17, 45.
12. Barker, N.; Clevers, H. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2006, 5, 997.
13. Peifer, M.; Polakis, P. Science 2000, 287, 1606.
14. Primeau, J. L.; Garrick, L. M. U.S. Patent 5,187,168, 1993.
15. Feng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wallace, M. B.; Stafford, J. A.; Kaldor, S. W.; Kassel, D. B.;
Navre, M.; Shi, L.; Skene, R. J.; Asakawa, T.; Takeuchi, K.; Xu, R.; Webb, D. R.;
Gwaltney, S. L., II J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 2297.
16. Huntress, E. H.; Gladding, J. V. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 2644.
17. Venkatesan, A. M.; Dehnhardt, C. M.; Chen, Z.; Santos, O. D.; Santos, E. D.;
Curran, K. J.; Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Chen, L. AM102561 L1, U.S. Patent
Application No. 60/879,837, 2007. PCT Int. Appl. (2008), 165pp. WO
2008086462 A2 20080717. WO 2008-US50728 20080110.
lines (16o vs 16h). Imidazole substitution was not tolerated, and
led to a dramatic loss in potency (IC50 >20 M for 16g). Replacing
phenyl with furanyl resulted in a loss in potency in both cell lines
(16f vs 2). In addition to aromatic substitutions, some alkyl substi-
tutions were also explored. Interestingly, the linear alkyl substitu-
l
tions such as methyl (16a, IC50 1.92
1.47 M) led to a loss in potency, but the branched or cyclic alkyl
groups such as iso-butyl (16b, IC50 0.57 M) and cyclohexyl (16d,
IC50 0.75 M) are both better tolerated. Carbamate analogue 16e
is also tolerated with an IC50 value of 0.76 M.
lM) and n-butyl (16c, IC50
l
l
l
l
As shown in Table 3, the exposure studies showed that the plas-
ma concentration of compound 2 in nude mouse (n = 4) is 2973 ng/
mL at 8 h following a single oral dose (200 mg/kg), while the tumor
concentration is 90,736 ng/mL, with a favorable tumor/plasma ra-
tio of 40. Compound 16k also exhibited good exposure in blood
and in tumor at 8 h after a single po dose (50 mg/kg). Compound
16k was preferentially distributed to the tumor with a tumor/plas-
ma ratio of 220. The pharmacokinetic studies in female nude mice
showed that both compounds exhibited reasonable bioavailability
(41% for 2, and 46% for 16k, respectively).
The in vivo efficacy of compounds 2 and 16k was then assessed
in nude mice bearing HT29 or HCT116 tumors grown subcutane-
ously. In this experiment, tumor volume was measured after po
dose of 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg once daily for 17 days. Only