C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Selective Oxidation of Alcohols
As we never observe molecular H2O2, a more reactive oxidation
agent than O2, H2O2, is presumably quickly rebound and undergoing
a second, similar two-electron cycle on the catalyst, which leads
to the formation of (more stable) water. Indeed, by adding, in a
reference experiment, H2O2 instead of O2 to the system, an even
higher turnover of benzylalcohol to benzaldehyde resulted (as
described in the Supporting Information), however, with lower
selectivity. We attribute this lower selectivity to the higher overall
concentration of perhydrol, while only the catalyst-surface bound
species are sufficiently mild to be highly selective.
In conclusion, we have shown that mpg-C3N4 can function as a
photocatalyst to activate O2 for the selective oxidation of benzyl
alcohols under visible light irradiation. By combining the surface
basicity and semiconductor functions of mpg-C3N4, the photocata-
lytic system can realize a high catalytic selectivity to generate
benzaldehyde. The system also selectively converts other alcohol
substrates to their corresponding aldehydes/ketones.
Time
[h]
Con.
[%]
Sel.
[%]
R1
R2
1
2
3
4
5b
6
7
8
9
Phenyl
Phenyl
H
CH3
H
H
H
3
3
3
3
1.8
3
3
5
3
57
77
86
79
100
80
92
35
32
>99
>99
90a
>99
95c
>99
64d
>99
90d
4-Methylphenyl
4-Chlorophenyl
4-Methoxyphenyl
4-Methylbenzoate
PhCHdCH2
Pentyl
H
H
CH3
Cyclopropyl
Phenyl
a Acid (10%) was formed. b 4-Methoxybenzylalcohol 0.65 mmol.
c Acid (5%) was formed. d Benzaldehyde (36%) was detected.
e 1-(1,2-Dicyclopropyl-2-phenylethyl)benzene (10%) was formed.
The whole set of experiments demonstrated a potential pathway
of accessing traditional mild radical chemistry, as it is otherwise
only done via nitroxyl radicals, such as TEMPO. The “mild” nature
of the mpg-C3N4 photocatalyst, together with its unique electronic
and surface properties, had already found some interesting applica-
tions in metal-free coordination chemistry and metal-free hetero-
geneous catalysis18 but now obviously can be extended to a broad
variety of related problems including O2 activation, organic
photosynthesis, or reductive CO2 fixation.
The effect of substitution on the aromatic ring has also been
studied. Both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating substit-
uents have been found to enhance the rate of the reaction (Table
2). These results also strongly support a radical mechanism. We
also examined the chemoselectiviy of the current system using some
additional substrates incorporating both aliphatic and benzylic
alcohols. The system showed high chemoselectivity toward the
benzylic alcohol moiety (Table S1).
A radical clock experiment using the cyclopropyl-phenylcarbinol
however failed. Oxidation of the substrate resulted in the formation
of the corresponding ketone with an intact cyclopropyl ring. This
is a strong indication that either no solution-based radicals are
relevant for the reaction or the reaction runs through an alkoxide
anion R to the benzyl radical which considerably decelerates the
rate of ring-opening.17 Another possibility is that the initial radical
formation is on the oxygen atom which immediately forms the CdO
bond through abstraction of a hydrogen radical.
Acknowledgment. Supported by NSFC (21033003), 973 Pro-
gram (2007CB613306), NCET (07-0192), PCSIR(0818), and the
Cluster of Excellence “Unifying Concepts in Catalysis” coordinated
by TU Berlin and funded by DFG.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and more
characterization and reaction results. This material is available free of
References
Scheme 3. Proposed Potential Oxidation Mechanism
(1) For example, see: (a) Nicewicz, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Science 2008,
322, 77–80. (b) Ischay, M. A.; Anzovino, M. E.; Du, J.; Yoon, T. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12886–12887. (c) Narayanam, J. M. R.; Tucker,
J. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8756–8757.
(2) Salomon, R. G.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 11376–1144.
(3) (a) Kalyanasundaram, K. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1982, 46, 159–244. (b) Juris,
A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zelewsky,
A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1988, 84, 85–277.
(4) Oregan, B.; Gra¨tzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740.
(5) Zhang, M.; Chen, C. C.; Ma, W. H.; Zhao, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 9730–9733.
(6) Sheldon, R. A.; Kochi, J. K. Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic
Compounds; Academic Press: New York, 1981.
(7) Wang, X. C.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Domen, K.;
Antonietti, M. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80.
(8) Zhang, J. S.; Chen, X. F.; Takanabe, K.; Maeda, K.; Domen, K.; Epping,
J. D.; Fu, X. Z.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 441–444.
(9) Yurdakal, S.; Palmisano, G.; Loddo, V.; Augugliaro, V.; Palmisano, L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1568–1569.
Based on the results, a mechanistic proposal for the oxidation
(10) Groenewolt, M.; Antonietti, M. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 1789–1792.
(11) Strelko, V. V.; Kartel, N. T.; Dukhno, I. N.; Kuts, V. S.; Clarkson, R. B.;
Odintsov, B. M. Surf. Sci. 2004, 548, 281–290.
-
reaction is given in Scheme 3. The superoxide radical anion (•O2
)
formed by the reduction of molecular oxygen (by the excited
electrons from the conduction band of the mpg-C3N4) stays
obviously surface bound to the C3N4, presumably as an interface
bound exciton pair to compensate for the positive charge within
the catalyst. The base character of the material also helps to
deprotonate a benzyl alcohol toward the alkoxide anion A, which
then can react with the positive hole by electron transfer to form
the radical B. Recombining this radical with the superoxide radical
finally results in the observed ketone and the formal liberation of
H2O2, the two-electron reduction product of O2.
(12) Su, F. Z.; Liu, Y. M.; Wang, L. C.; Cao, Y.; He, H. Y.; Fan, K. N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 334–337.
(13) Hoffmann, M. R.; Martin, S. T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D. W. Chem. ReV.
1995, 95, 69–96.
(14) Riess, J. G.; Blanc, M. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 621–
634.
(15) Punniyamurthy, T.; Velusamy, S.; Iqbal, J. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2329–
2363.
(16) Harbour, J. R.; Hair, M. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 1397–1399.
(17) Tanko, J. M.; Philips, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6078–6079.
(18) Thomas, A.; Fischer, A.; Goettmann, F.; Antonietti, M.; Muller, J. O.;
Schlo¨gl, R.; Carlsson, J. M. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4893–4908.
JA102866P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 46, 2010 16301