acceptor (DA) systems through conjugated spacers, with TiO2
surface anchoring groups (e.g., carboxylate) integrated onto
the acceptor moiety.5 Irradiation of these bipolar molecules
generates photoinduced intramolecular charge transfer states,
which can inject electrons to the TiO2 conduction band. The
preferential orientation of the dye on the surface not only
improves charge injection but also maintains the photo-
oxidized donor at a distance from the photoinjected electrons,
diminishing the impact of deleterious back electron transfer
processes. Using this strategy, many bipolar metal-free dyes
have been incorporated as efficient sensitizers in DSSCs in
recent years.6-10 Diphenylamine (DPA) and cyanoacrylic
acid moieties are among the most commonly employed
subunits for the electron donor and electron acceptor/
anchoring groups, respectively, in the design of organic dyes
for highly efficient DSSCs.9-14 Variation of the conjugated
spacer connecting the donor and acceptor has resulted in dyes
reaching remarkable incident photon-to-current efficiencies
(IPCEs) and energy conversion efficiencies.15 The nature of
the π-conjugated bridge in the dye influences not only the
region of light absorbed by the DSSCs but also the degree
of electron injection from the dye’s excited state to the TiO2
surface. A common strategy for efficient harvesting of solar
energy is the use of long π-conjugated bridges that red-shift
the absorption spectra.5 The presence of lengthy rodlike
structures, however, can lead to aggregation and, therefore,
self-quenching and inefficient electron injection into the
TiO2.13,16 These deleterious processes can be avoided, or
suppressed, when the dye molecules possess bulky structural
features that impede aggregation.
than their single components. Spiro linkages are particularly
beneficial for fluorescent emitters, suppressing the excimer
formation that is frequently encountered in the solid state.
Molecules possessing a spirobifluorene core and tailor-made
optical and redox properties are used widely in organic
optoelectronics.17 For example, 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-
methoxyphenylamino)-9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-MeOTAD)
is one of the most efficient organic hole transporters used in
the development of solid-state DSSC.18 Nevertheless, it is
rare for DSSC dyes to be arranged in a spiro configuration,
even though fluorene-containing dyes have been incorporated
into DSSCs.14,19-21 In this study, we synthesized the
spirobifluorene-based bipolar dye SSD1 (Scheme 1) featuring
Scheme 1. Synthesis of SSD1
a diphenylamino (DPA) group as the donor and a 2-cy-
anoacrylic acid unit as the acceptor, with a fluorene bridge
ensuring efficient DA interactions. This novel dye possesses
several unique features that are potential advantages for
application in DSSCs. For example, SSD1 is composed of
two DA branches in a rigid cross-shaped molecular structure,
which not only doubles the light absorption efficiency but
also minimizes dye aggregation. In addition, two anchoring
carboxylate groups are presentsone at each electron acceptor
sitesto improve dye adsorption on basic TiO2 surfaces and
to direct the photoinduced electron injection.15
Scheme 1 outlines our synthesis of SSD1. 2,2′-Diformyl-
7,7′-bisdiphenyamino-9,9′-spirobifluorene (1)22 was reacted
with cyanoacetic acid and ammonium acetate in glacial acetic
acid at 135 °C for 24 h. The product was purified through
reprecipitation from EtOAc and hexane to afford SSD1 as a
red solid in 95% yield.
The bridging of two chromophores perpendicularly via an
sp3-hybridized atom into a spiro configuration allows the
constituted π-systems to retain their individual electronic
properties (e.g., absorption and emission characteristics). In
addition, the high steric demand resulting from the rigid
structure efficiently suppresses intermolecular interactions,
thereby diminishing the tendency to form aggregates;17 as a
corollary, spiro-configured compounds have higher solubility
(5) Kim, C.; Choi, H.; Kim, S.; Baik, C.; Song, K.; Kang, M.-S.; Kang,
S.-O.; Ko, J. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7072.
(6) Campbell, W. M.; Burrell, A. K.; Officer, D. L.; Jolley, K. W. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2004, 248, 1363
(7) Howie, W. H.; Claeyssens, F.; Miura, H.; Peter, L. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 1367
(8) Thavas, V.; Renugopalakrishnan, V.; Jose, R.; Ramakrishna, S.
Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 2009, 63, 81
(9) Mishra, A.; Fischer, M. K. R.; Ba¨uerle, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 2474
.
.
Figure 1a presents the absorption and emission spectra of
SSD1 in MeCN. We observed two distinct absorption bands:
one in the UV region (300 nm), corresponding to the π-π*
electronic transition of the spirobifluorene core, and the other
in the visible region (392 nm; ε392 ) 4.7 × 104 cm-1 mol-1),
corresponding to the strong DA intramolecular charge
.
.
(10) Chen, Z.; Li, F.; Huang, C. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 1241
.
(11) Zhang, F.; Luo, Y.-H.; Song, J.-S.; Guo, X.-Z.; Liu, W.-L.; Ma,
C.-P.; Huang, Y.; Ge, M.-F.; Bo, Z.; Meng, Q.-B. Dyes Pigm. 2009, 81,
224
.
(12) Justin-Thomas, K. R.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Lin, J. T.; Lee, K.-M.; Ho, K.-
C.; Lai, C.-H.; Cheng, Y.-M.; Chou, P.-T. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 1830
(13) Ning, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, W.; Pei, H.; Liu, B.; Tian, H. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 3791
.
(18) (a) Bach, U.; Lupo, D.; Comte, P.; Moser, J. E.; Weissortel, F.;
Salbeck, J.; Spreitzer, H.; Gra¨tzel, M. Nature 1998, 395, 583. (b) Fabregat-
Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Cevey, L.; Chen, P.; Wang, M.; Zakeeruddin,
S. M.; Gra¨tzel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 558.
.
(14) (a) Baheti, A.; Tyagi, P.; Justin-Thomas, K. R.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Lin,
J. T. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 8541. (b) Zhou, G.; Pschirer, N.;
Scho¨neboom, J. C.; Eickemeyer, F.; Baumgarten, M.; Mu¨llen, K. Chem.
(19) Justin-Thomas, K. R.; Lin, J. T.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Ho, K.-C. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 4098
(20) Yen, Y.-S.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Lin, J. T.; Chang, C.-W.; Hsu, C.-P.; Yin,
D.-J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 12557
(21) Lin, J. T.; Chen, P.-C.; Yen, Y.-S.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Chou, H.-H.; Yeh,
M.-C. P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 97
.
Mater. 2008, 20, 1808
.
(15) Tian, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, R.; Zhang, R.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sun, L. J.
Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 11023.
.
(16) Ning, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Pei, H.; Luan, J.; Lu, C.; Cui, Y.; Tian, H. J.
.
Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 10307
.
(22) Chiang, C. L.; Shu, C.-F.; Chen, C.-T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3717.
(23) Roquet, S.; Cravino, A.; Leriche, P.; Ale´veˆque, O.; Fre`re, P.;
Roncali, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3459.
(17) Saragi, T. P. I.; Spehr, T.; Siebert, A.; Fuhrmann-Lieker, T.;
Salbeck, J. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 1011.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 1, 2010
13