Hayashi using the Rh-BINAP complex.6 The same group
reported in 2010 an Ir-tbf catalytic system for the 1,6-
addition of arylboroxines to linear dienones.7 Moreover,
several reports have appeared on copper-catalyzed 1,6-ACA
to both cyclic and linear substrates.8 Those publications, as
well as previous studies on an achiral version of copper-
catalyzed 1,6-CA,5 suggest that nucleophilic attack usually
leads to the 1,6-adducts. However, recent results reported
by Alexakis seem to contradict this observation.9 Alexakis
observed that the regioselectivity of the ACA to R,ꢀ,γ,δ-
unsaturated six-membered cyclic dienone 1a depends on the
nature of the nucleophile and the chiral ligand; 1,6 regiose-
lectivity was observed if Et2Zn or Et3Al was used in the
presence of a Cu-phosphoramidite complex, whereas the
1,4-adduct was isolated when Grignard reagents were
employed in the presence of a Cu-NHC catalyst. Hoveyda
reported, as well, one example of the 1,4-selectivity for the
additionofMe2Zntodienonecatalyzedbyaniminopeptide-Cu
complex.10 Those studies show that copper-catalyzed 1,6-
ACA to cyclic substrates, and in particular five-membered
cyclic dienones, never reported in the literature, is still
underdeveloped. Moreover, the resulting products, original
Michael acceptors, could have great potential in synthesis.
Thus, we explored the potential of DiPPAM in 1,6-ACA,
and we report herein the regio- and enantioselective addition
of diorganozinc to five- and six-membered functionalized
cyclic dienones.
particularly efficient in 1,6-ACA to linear dienoates,8c for
this selected reaction were totally regioselective but seemed
to be less enantioselective (L3, 67% ee; L4:, 75% ee; Scheme
1). Thus, L1 could be considered as a highly promising
ligand for this transformation.
Indeed, the optimization of the experimental conditions
enabled us to increase the enantiocontrol of this reaction.
The choice of the cosolvent (33% of the solvent is hexanes
from the commercial Et2Zn solution) was crucial for an
efficient enantiocontrol. The reactions, carried out in both
Et2O and t-BuOMe, afforded 2a with moderate ee’s (Table
1, entries 2 and 3), whereas the use of toluene or AcOEt
Table 1. Optimization of Experimental Conditions
entry
x %
y %
solvent
convn (%)a
ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
7.5
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
THF
Et2O
t-BuOMe
toluene
AcOEt
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
MeTHF
>99
98
83
83
63
56
80
84
87
56
91
93
94
-
98
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
-
The first test reaction with Cu-L1 led to the formation
of the desired product 2a (after reconjugation in the presence
of DBU) with total regioselectivity, as expected, and 83%
ee (Scheme 1). This nonoptimized result was slightly worse
9
10
11
12c
-
5
5
>99
>99
96
97
13c d e
,
,
Scheme 1. Cu-Catalyzed 1,6-ACA on Cyclic Dienone 1
a Determined by GC-MS analysis. b Determined by GC analysis.
c Reaction performed at 0 °C. d Addition of a Et2Zn solution in MeTHF.11
e Reaction treatment: NH4Cls, argon.
gave 2a with ee > 80% (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). The best
result, 87% ee, was obtained in MeTHF (Table 1, entry 6).
The Cu/DiPPAM ratio also has a very important influence
on the enantioselectivity of the reaction. The excess of Cu
toward the ligand led to a drastic decrease of the ee (Table
1, entry 7). On the contrary, when the Cu/DiPPAM ratio
was inferior to 1, an improvement of the enantioselectivity
was observed (Table 1, entries 8-10). Nevertheless, the
reaction performed in the absence of Cu(OTf)2 did not afford
any product, thus the necessity of the presence of the metal
was demonstrated (Table 1, entry 11).
than the unique reported example, -89% ee, obtained with
the Cu-L2 catalyst.9 The Josiphos-type ligands (L3 and L4),
(6) Hayashi, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Tokunaga, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4224–4227.
The additional improvement of the enantioselectivity was
reached through a decrease of the reaction temperature to 0
°C and the use of a Et2Zn solution in MeTHF (Table 1,
entries 12 and 13).11 Unsurprisingly, the desired reaction was
accompanied by the formation of a small amount of the
oxidative byproduct.9,12 To prevent this, a slight modification
(7) Nishimura, T.; Yasuhara, Y.; Sawano, T.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 7872–7873.
(8) (a) Fillion, E.; Wilsily, A.; Liao, E.-T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006,
17, 2957–2959. (b) den Hartog, T.; Harutyunyan, S. R.; Font, D.; Minnaard,
A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 398–401. (c) Lee,
K.-s.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2898–2900. (d) Tissot,
M.; Mu¨ller, D.; Belot, S.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2770–2773.
(9) He´non, H.; Mauduit, M.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 9122–9124.
(10) Cesati, R. R.; de Armas, J.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 96–101.
(11) For experimental procedure, see Supporting Information.
(12) Jin, Z.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 5995–5996
.
4336
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 19, 2010