Organic Letters
Letter
In our initial studies, the reaction of 2-phenylpyridine (1a)
and N-phenyl-N-tosylbenzamide (2a) was chosen as the model
to optimize the reaction conditions for amide C−N bond
activation using [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 and K2CO3 as the
precatalyst and base, respectively. The results are summarized
in Table 1. The desired ortho-acylated product 3aa was
formation of acylation product 3aa in higher yield than those
obtained using other ligands (entry 16 vs entries 13 and 14).
Although the yield of 3aa was successfully increased to 70% by
the combined use of MesCO2H and PCy3 in acetone, the
generation of a trace amount of byproduct mesityl(2-(pyridin-
2-yl)phenyl)methanone was also detected. To our delight, the
formation of a byproduct can be completely suppressed by
utilizing a sterically hindered acid, such as 2,4,6-triisopropyl-
benzoic acid (TIPBA), as the additive instead of MesCO2H
(entry 17, 72% yield). Further investigation revealed that the
ligand tri-p-tolylphosphane [P(p-Tol)3] gave the same effect as
PCy3 (entry 17 vs entry 18). The reactivities of other activated
amides, such as N-(tert-butyloxycarbonyl)-N-benzylbenzamide
(2ab), N,N-di(tert-butyloxycarbonyl) benzamide (2ac), and 1-
benzoylpiperidine-2,6-dione (2ad), were also investigated.
Diminished or no reactivity was observed under the optimal
reaction conditions (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Ru-
a
Catalyzed C−H/C−N Activation
b
Entry
Solvent
Additive
Ligand
Yield (%)
25
NR
1
2
3
4
5
6
toluene
DCE
THF
dioxane
DMF
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
NaOAc
AcOH
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PtBu3·HBF4
PPh3
c
15
32
trace
35
39
40
24
45
45
47
64
51
36
70
72
72
Scheme 1. Reactivities of Different Activated Amides
tBuOH
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
acetone
7
8
9
TFA
PivOH
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1-AdCO2H
PhCO2H
MesCO2H
MesCO2H
MesCO2H
MesCO2H
TIPBA
The scope and limitation of this type of aromatic C−H bond
direct acylation reaction were determined under the optimal
reaction conditions. First, the scope of 2-arylpyridines was
investigated using 2a as the reaction partner. The results are
shown in Table 2. Similarly, the reactions of para-substituted
2-phenylpyridines (1b−1l) proceeded as smoothly as the
reaction of 1a to produce the ortho-acylated products 3ab−3al
in satisfactory to good yields (60%−84%). These results
revealed that the electronic property (electron-donating or
electron-withdrawing) of the substituent linked to the benzene
ring did not exert a remarkable influence on the reactivity of 2-
arylpyridines. Synthetically useful functional groups, such as
vinyl, fluorine, methoxycarbonyl, and acetyl, linked to the
benzene rings of substrates 1i−1l were maintained in the
structures of products 3ai−3al. This finding suggests that
further manipulation may produce additional useful com-
pounds. Interestingly, acylation and aldol condensation
simultaneously occurred to produce unexpected product 3am
when the substrate 1m, which bears a formyl group on the
para-position, was examined in acetone. No reaction was
observed when a 2-arylpyridine substrate with an ortho-
substituent on the benzene ring was tested under the optimal
reaction conditions; the reason may be attributed to the steric
hindrance caused by the ortho-substituent. The results
obtained by further investigation indicated that a substituent
linked on the pyridine ring of 2-arylpyridine also did not
influence reactivity. The desired products 3an−3ar were
obtained in high to good yields (69%−85%). As expected,
the reaction of naphthalene ring-containing substrate 1s also
proceeded smoothly to furnish the corresponding product 3as
in 65% yield. Although the desired product 3at was collected in
relatively low yield (52%), the result obtained indicated that
the pyrazole ring can be employed as a directing group in this
type of C−H/C−N bond activation. In addition, no reaction
PnBu3
PCy3
PCy3
P(p-Tol)3
TIPBA
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (1.5 equiv), [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), and additive (30 mol %) in
b
solvent (1.5 mL) at 100 °C under a N2 atmosphere for 24 h. Isolated
c
yield. No reaction was observed; the starting materials were
recovered.
obtained along with 4-methyl-N-phenylbenzenesulfonamide as
byproduct. The solvent was screened using sodium acetate
(NaOAc) as the additive and PtBu3·HBF4 as the ligand at 100
°C under a nitrogen atmosphere for 24 h. Among the solvents
examined [toluene, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), tetrahydrofur-
an (THF), 1,4-dioxane, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF),
tertiary butanol (tBuOH), and acetone], acetone proved to
be the best solvent (entries 1−7). Usually, an additive which
will react with a precatalyst to produce active species is
necessary in TM-catalyzed C−H bond activation reactions.18
Therefore, the additives were subsequently screened using
acetone as the solvent. The efficiency of salt (NaOAc) and
acids [acetic acid (AcOH), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), pivalic
acid (PivOH), 1-adamantane carboxylic acid (1-AdCO2H),
benzoic acid (PhCO2H), and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoic acid
(MesCO2H)] was investigated. A relatively high yield (64%)
was obtained when MesCO2H was utilized as the additive
(entry 13 vs entries 7−12). The ligands were finally screened
using acetone and MesCO2H as the solvent and additive,
respectively. Among the phosphine ligands [tri-tert-butylphos-
phine tetrafluoroborate (PtBu3·HBF4), triphenylphosphine
(PPh3), tri-n-butylphosphine (PnBu3), and tricyclohexyl-
phosphine (PCy3)] examined, the use of PCy3 led to the
2522
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2521−2526