LETTER
Asymmetric Aza-Claisen Rearrangement of N-Allylic Carboxamides
2969
E. D.; Smith, A. D.; Thomson, J. E. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2009, 7, 2604. (c) Castro, A. M. M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104,
2939. (d) Nubbemeyer, U. Synthesis 2003, 961.
When the reaction gave poor results, we suspected that the
decomposition of the enolates of the carboxamides via the
ketene12 was one of the undesired reactions.13 However,
as the reaction of 9 with 1.5 equivalents of LHMDS gave
a complex mixture of products, no direct evidence for this
decomposition pathway could be found. So, N,N-dibenzyl
propanamide (12) was employed as a model compound
for studies of the decomposition pathways of the amide
enolate. First, N,N-dibenzyl propanamide (12) was treated
with 1.5 equivalents of LHMDS at 80 °C for one hour,
giving 83% of recovered 12. However, when the reaction
was conducted at 120 °C for one hour with 1.5 equivalents
of LHMDS, only 46% of 12 was recovered along with
some dibenzylamine. In contrast, use of five equivalents
of LHMDS (120 °C, 1 h) increased the recovery yield of
12 to 86%. These findings suggested the following: 1) de-
compositions occurred at around 120 °C, the temperature
at which the aza-Claisen rearrangement took place, and 2)
excess base stabilized the amide enolates and prevented
the decomposition to ketene and other undesirable side re-
actions (Scheme 2), although the reason was unclear.
(2) (a) Tsunoda, T.; Sakai, M.; Sasaki, O.; Sako, Y.; Hondo, Y.;
Itô, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1651. (b) Tsunoda, T.;
Tatsuki, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Akasaka, M.; Itô, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1993, 34, 3297. (c) Itô, S.; Tsunoda, T. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1994, 66, 2071. (d) Tsunoda, T.; Nishii, T.;
Yoshizuka, M.; Yamasaki, C.; Suzuki, T.; Itô, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7667. (e) Nishii, T.; Suzuki, S.;
Yoshida, K.; Arakaki, K.; Tsunoda, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 7829. (f) Tsunoda, T.; Tatsuki, S.; Kataoka, K.;
Itô, S. Chem. Lett. 1994, 543. (g) Tsunoda, T.; Ozaki, F.;
Shirakata, N.; Tamaoka, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Itô, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2463. (h) Inai, M.; Nishii, T.;
Mukoujima, S.; Esumi, T.; Kaku, H.; Tominaga, K.; Abe,
H.; Horikawa, M.; Tsunoda, T. Synlett 2011, 1459.
(3) The stereochemistry of the products was determined by the
comparison with the samples, which had been obtained by
the rearrangement of 1a; see ref. 2a.
(4) It was suspected that the basicity of LHMDS was not
sufficient to deprotonate the amides, and stronger bases must
be required. However, the reaction with LDA gave lower
yields and stereoselectivities; see ref. 2a. Furthermore, the
reaction of 9a utilizing s-BuLi (1.5 equiv) gave the same
results as with LHMDS (1.5 equiv).
O
O
(5) Typical Procedure for the Aza-Claisen Rearrangement
To a solution of LHMDS (1.0 M in toluene, 5.0 mL) in
toluene (3 mL) was added a toluene solution (3 mL) of
carboxamide 9d (231 mg, 1.0 mmol) at –78 °C under an
argon atmosphere in a pressure tube.6 After 30 min with
stirring, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and
was sealed. After heating of the sealed solution at 120 °C for
24 h, a sat. aq NaHCO3 (24 mL) was added, and the mixture
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (30 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and
evaporated.7 The residual mixture was purified by SiO2
column chromatography (n-hexane–EtOAc = 3:1) to give
156 mg (68%) of 11d and 39 mg (17%) of a mixture of 10d
and 11d as colorless needles, respectively.
Bn
Δ
O
Bn
Bn
–
N
+
N
N
–
Bn
Bn
Bn
12
Scheme 2 Decomposition of the lithium enolate of 12
Based on Ireland’s investigation14 of Claisen rearrange-
ment of silyl enol ethers derived from esters, we propose
an explanation for the results described in this paper.
Ireland reported that the alkyl substituent on the 1,5-diene
system affected the reaction rate, with the reaction rate of
the less substituted 1,5-diene being considerably slower.
In our investigation, the reaction of 9b,c required a longer
reaction period than that of 1a did. In the case of 9a and
9d–f, it seems feasible that the rate of the reaction was
slowed by steric repulsion caused by the pseudo-axial
substituents on the allylic olefin in the six-membered
chairlike transition state. In this situation, we presumed
that the decomposition of the lithium enolates of 9a–f to
the respective ketenes and other byproducts became the
predominant reaction. However, as mentioned above, the
addition of excess base prevented the decomposition and
promoted the desired rearrangement.
Compound 10d: mp 84.5–85.5 °C (n-hexane–EtOAc).
[a]D21 –94.7 (c 0.65, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 7.40–7.20 (m, 5 H), 5.65 (br d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.13
(quin, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.76 (m, 1 H), 4.73 (m, 1 H), 2.45–
2.30 (m, 2 H), 2.09 (ddd, J = 12.5, 5.2, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.72
(dd, J = 1.2, 0.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.47 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.11 (d,
J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 174.9,
143.24, 143.21, 128.6, 127.3, 126.2, 112.4, 48.5, 42.2, 39.6,
22.4, 21.6, 17.6. IR (ATR): 3269, 2970, 1637, 1542, 1450
cm–1. MS (CI): m/z = 232 [M + H]+ (base peak), 231 [M]+,
128, 105. HRMS (CI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H22ON:
232.1701; found: 232.1701.
Compound 11d: mp 54.2–55.5 °C (n-hexane–EtOAc);
[a]D21 –84.6 (c 0.43, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 7.40–7.20 (m, 5 H), 5.66 (br d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.13
(quin, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 4.74 (br s, 1 H), 4.68 (br s, 1 H),
2.45–2.30 (m, 2 H), 2.07 (dd, J = 17.2, 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.67
(s, 3 H), 1.48 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 1.14 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 175.0, 143.2, 143.1,
128.6, 127.3, 126.2, 112.4, 48.4, 42.1, 39.6, 22.3, 21.5, 17.6.
IR (ATR): 3285, 2970, 1639, 1538, 1450 cm–1. MS (CI):
m/z = 232 [M + H]+ (base peak), 231 [M]+, 128, 105. HRMS
(CI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H22ON: 232.1701; found:
232.1701.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported partially by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (C) from MEXT (the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan). We are also thankful to
MEXT-Senryaku, 2008-2012.
References and Notes
(6) An air-tight cylinder for high-pressure experiments is
available at Alltech Associates, Inc.
(7) At this point, the diastereomeric ratio was determined by
GLC or LC.
(1) Percent review of aza-Claisen rearrangement:
(a) Majumdar, K. C.; Bhattacharyya, T.; Chattopadhyay, B.;
Sinha, B. Synthesis 2009, 2117. (b) Davies, S. G.; Garner,
A. C.; Nicholson, R. L.; Osborne, J.; Roberts, P. M.; Savory,
Synlett 2011, No. 20, 2967–2970 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York