D
M. D. Kerim et al.
Letter
Synlett
stronger in TSA than in TSB. The computed out-of-plane dis-
tance between the nitrogen atom and the O–C–O plane of
the nitronate moiety are 0.38 Å and 0.25 Å for TSA and TSB,
respectively. It should be stressed that even a small differ-
ence in planarity may affect the transition states energy
substantially, because the out-of-plane distortion tends to
disrupt the local delocalization of electrons, which plays a
key role in the stability of the group.
In order to support this mechanistic proposition, we de-
cided to examine the behavior of silyl nitronate 2a towards
phenyl boroxine instead of phenyl boronic acid. Using the
former anhydride directly, the key synthetic intermediate
displaying two boron atoms complexed to the silyl nitro-
nate should be formed more easily, leading to a potential in-
crease in yield. While heating 2a with 2.5 equivalents of
phenyl boronic acid led to phenyl-cyclohexenyl oxime 4l in
a poor 24% yield after 30 min, heating the same reaction
with 1 equivalent of triphenylboroxine led to 4l in 32%
yield. Though not large, this increase in yield supports a po-
tential effect of boronic anhydrides on the mechanism of
this reaction.
ric quantities or in conjunction with oxygen. Indeed, when
oxime 4a was heated in acetonitrile in the presence of cop-
per chloride we observed the formation of isoxazole 5a in a
moderate 50% isolated yield (Scheme 7). Attempts to per-
form this reaction in other solvents such as DMF or THF re-
sulted in lower yields. Further optimization for this known
transformation was not pursued, and Scheme 7 displays the
results of the cyclizations under these conditions. All oxim-
es gave fused isoxazoles 5 in good to moderate yields.
Funding Information
M. D. K. thanks the Islamic Development Bank for a PhD fellowship.
We thank the ENSTA Paris for financial support.()
Supporting Information
Supporting information for this article is available online at
S
u
p
p
orti
n
gInformati
o
n
S
u
p
p
orti
n
gInformati
o
n
References and Notes
With these unsaturated oximes in hand, we next exam-
ined their conversion into oxazole derivatives. Several con-
ditions for oxidative transformation of ,-unsaturated ox-
imes into oxazoles have been reported in the literature.10
The reaction may be observed using various oxidants such
as manganese dioxide and copper salts used in stoichiomet-
(1) For reviews on boronic acids, see: (a) Boronic Acids: Preparation
and Applications in Organic Synthesis, Medicine and Materials;
Hall, D. G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2011. (b) Boron Reagents
in Synthesis, ACS Symposium Series 1236; Coca, A., Ed.; American
Chemical Society: Washington DC, 2016.
(2) For reviews on the Petassis reaction, see: (a) Candeias N. R.:
Montalbano, F.; Cal, P. M. S. D.; Gois, P. M. P. Chem. Rev. 2010,
110, 6169. (b) Ramadhar, T. R.; Batey, R. A. Recent Advances in
Nucleophilic Addition Reactions of Organoboronic Acids and their
Derivatives to Unsaturated C–N Functionalities, In Boronic Acids:
Preparation and Applications in Organic Synthesis, Medicine and
Materials; Hall, D. G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2011, Chap. 9,
427–477. (c) Guerrera, C. A.; Ryder, T. R. The Petassis Borono-
Mannich Multicomponent Reaction, In Boron Reagents in Synthe-
sis, ACS Symposium Series 1236; Coca, A., Ed.; American Chemi-
cal Society: Washington DC, 2016, Chap. 9, 275–311.
OH
N
N
O
CuCl2·2H2O (2 equiv)
Ar
Ar
MeCN/H2O (4:1)
0.1 M, 75 °C, 2 h
4
5
n
n
O
O
N
N
O
N
(3) For a review, see: (a) Roscales, S.; Csakÿ, A. G. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2014, 43, 8215. For some recent examples, see: (b) Ortega, V.;
del Castillo, E.; Csakÿ, A. G. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 6236. (c) He, Z.;
Song, F.; Sun, H.; Huang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2693.
(d) Bomio, C.; Kabeshov, M. A.; Lit, A. R.; Lau, S.-H.; Ehlert, J.;
Battilocchio, C.; Ley, S. V. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 6071.
Et
OMe
Et
5c 58%
5b 54%
5a 50%
O
N
O
Me
O
N
N
(4) Candeias, N. R.; Veiros, L. F.; Afonso, C. A. M.; Gois, P. M. P. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 1859.
Ph
OMe
OMe
(5) For a review on the Nef reaction, see: (a) Ballini, R.; Petrini, M.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2371. For examples of nucleophilic
additions leading to oximes, see: (b) Fanté, B.; Soro, Y.; Siaka, S.;
Marrot, J.; Coustard, J.-M. Synlett 2014, 25, 969. (c) Fujisawa, T.;
Kurita, Y.; Sato, T. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1537. (d) Kim, J. N.; Song, J.
H.; Ryu, E. K. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 1711. (e) Dumestre, P.;
El Kaïm, L.; Grégoire, A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 775.
(6) (a) Arndt, F.; Rose, J. D. J. Chem. Soc. 1935, 1. (b) Kornblum, N. R.;
Brown, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 2681.
(7) Ono, N. Alkylation, Acylation, and Halogenation of Nitro Com-
pounds, In The Nitro Group in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2001, Chap. 5, 126–158.
5f 63%a
5e 50%
5d 67%
Scheme 7 Formation of isoxazoles 5 from oximes 4. a The reaction was
left for 12 h for completion.In conclusion, we have disclosed a new in-
teraction of boronic acids with silyl nitronates.11 This aryl transfer from
a boron atom onto the electrophilic C=N double bond of a nitronate ex-
tends the previously disclosed oxime synthesis through aryl magnesium5c
and aryl lithium12 additions onto silyl nitronates. When performed on ni-
tromethylcycloalkenyl derivatives, the resulting oximes may be easily
converted into fused isoxazoles under oxidative conditions.13 We are
currently exploring the potential of various catalysts to trigger the addi-
tion of boronic acids onto less reactive alkyl silylnitronate species.
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved. Synlett 2020, 31, A–E