Organometallics
Communication
spectrum, however, 6 showed only one ddd signal, due to the
carbonyl groups at δC 192.1 ppm (2JCP = 32.7 and 38.2 Hz,
1JCRh = 66.0 Hz). Even an NMR measurement of 6 at −100 °C
in toluene-d8 was unable to resolve this signal and resulted only
in broadening. The integration of this signal relative to an
external standard indicated that the signal should correspond to
two overlapping CO moieties. Furthermore, we found that a
C6D6 solution of 6 was inert toward ethylene gas bubbling,
suggesting that no dissociation equilibrium of CO from the
rhodium center is present. Thus, we concluded that in solution
both CO moieties should easily exchange with each other even
at low temperature.17 The variable-temperature (room temper-
ature to −100 °C) UV/vis spectra of 6 in hexane did not show
any temperature dependence (λmax 539 (ε 3400), 450 (3400),
368 (11000) nm). In the IR spectrum, the carbonyl stretching
frequencies of 6 were observed at νCO 2030 and 1973 cm−1
(KBr), which are slightly shifted in comparison to those of the
related compounds bearing imino-phosphido ligands (νCO 1989
and 2046 cm−1).8
The solid-state structure of crystalline rhodium phosphaal-
kenyl−phosphide 6 is shown in Figure 1. Monoanionic
phosphaalkenyl−phosphido ligand 3 is bound to the rhodium
center in a P,P′-chelating fashion. The central six-membered
Rh−P−C−C−C−P ring shows a quasi-planar alignment, and
the internal angle sum is approximately 718°, indicative of a
delocalization of the π electrons over the ring skeleton. The
angle sum around Rh is 366°, showing a slightly distorted
square planar structure. A bond length for P1−C1 of 1.774(3)
Å represents an intermediate value between typical P−C single
bonds (1.79−1.83 Å)18 and PC double bonds (1.60−1.70
Å).15 While the bond angle sum around P2 (ca. 360°) reflects a
planar geometry consistent with sp2 hybridization, the bond
angle sum around P1 (351.2°) is indicative of slight
pyramidalization. The theoretically optimized structure of
6OPT exhibits structural parameters which are in agreement
with the experimentally observed values (Figure 2).
However, optimized geometric parameters of a less hindered
model compound with Me substituents (6Me) are also in good
agreement with the experimentally observed values (Figure 2),
suggesting that the structural features of 6 should not be
perturbed by the steric hindrance of the bulky Mes* groups.
The observed pyramidalized geometries should be character-
istic for the presence of phosphorus, because the observed
structures of P,N-analogues of 7 and 88 and the theoretically
optimized structure of the N,N′ analogue of 6NNOPT exhibit
planar geometries around the N atoms (Figure 2). In spite of
the slightly pyramidalized geometry of the P1 atom, the P1−C1
bond length of 1.774(3) Å is shorter than the corresponding
P−C bond length of 1.845(2) Å in protonated species 4,
indicating a substantial contribution of canonical structure 3B
(Figure 1). In addition, the C1−C2 and C2−C3 bond lengths
of 6 are 1.437(3) and 1.428(3) Å, respectively, suggesting that
3 exhibits an electronic resonance structure between 3A and 3B
(Figure 1) caused by the coordination toward the Rh moiety.
The calculated HOMO of 6 shows π-conjugated character of
the P−C6H4−CP moiety, and especially the π orbitals on the
P1−C1 and C2−C3 bonds indicate a conjugative contribution
(Figure 3). Nevertheless, the P2−C3 bond length of 1.677(3)
Å is comparable to the corresponding PC bond length of
1.678(2) Å in 4, indicating a decreased electronic effect toward
the P2−C3 moiety as a result of the complexation with the
rhodium atom. In the case of the N,P analogues 7 and 8
(Figure 2), the trans influence of the P moiety should be,
Scheme 2
1
constant of 37 Hz. The H NMR spectrum of 4 exhibited a
characteristic doublet for the P−H moiety at 6.51 ppm (1JPH
=
236 Hz), which is slightly shifted to low field in comparison to
the signals for diarylphosphines (ca. 5 ppm).14 The doublet
arising from the PCH moiety was observed at 9.08 ppm
(2JPH = 25 Hz), which is slightly shifted to low field relative to
(E)-Mes*PCHPh at 8.12 ppm (2JPH = 25.3 Hz).15
Attempted deprotonation reactions of 4 with n-BuLi, LDA,
NaH, and KH resulted in the formation of complicated
mixtures, from which it was difficult to isolate or use the
lithiated species 3 as an appropriate precursor for complexation
reactions. Therefore, we decided to use protonated ligand 4
itself for the reaction with a transition-metal halide complex
1
under basic conditions. When 4 was treated with /2 equiv of
[RhCl(CO)2]2 in the presence of triethylamine at room
temperature for 3 h, rhodium phosphaalkenyl−phosphide 6
was obtained quantitatively in the form of air- and moisture-
stable reddish purple crystals. The 31P NMR spectrum of 6
showed two sets of doublets of doublets at 117.0 ppm (2JPP
=
1
49 Hz, JPRh = 127 Hz) for P1 and at 172.0 ppm (2JPP = 49
Hz,1JPRh = 160 Hz) for P2 (Figure 1). The signal for P1 is
shifted to low field in comparison to that of [(dippe)Rh-
(PPh2)(PHPh2)] (dippe = 1,2-bis(diisopropylphosphino)-
ethane; δP(PPh2) −47.2 to −46.3).16 In the 13C NMR
Figure 1. Molecular structure of rhodium phosphaalkenyl−phosphide
6. Displacement ellipsoids were drawn at the 50% probability level.
Hydrogen atoms, benzene, and hexane are omitted for clarity. Selected
bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): P1−Rh, 2.2661(7); P2−Rh,
2.2473(7); Rh−C4, 1.921(3); Rh−C5, 1.892(3); C4−O1, 1.101(3);
C5−O2, 1.133(3); P1−C1, 1.774(3); P2−C3, 1.677(3); C1−C2,
1.437(3); C2−C3, 1.428(3); P1−Rh−P2, 87.44(3); C4−Rh−C5,
93.08(13); Rh−P1−C1, 126.40(9); Rh−P2−C3, 125.89(10); P1−
C1−C2, 123.8(2); C1−C2−C3, 124.8(2); C2−C3−P2, 129.9(2).
1342
dx.doi.org/10.1021/om500065n | Organometallics 2014, 33, 1341−1344