3362 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 13, 1998
Malfant et al.
anisotropic thermal parameters have been deposited at the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Center.
Chart 1
Electronic Band Structure Calculations. The electronic structures
were obtained on the basis of extended Hu¨ckel19 tight-binding (EHTB)
band structure calculations.20 The off-diagonal matrix elements of the
effective Hamiltonian were calculated according to the modified
Wolfsberg-Helmholz formula. The exponents, contraction coefficients,
and atomic parameters used in the calculations are tabulated as
previously reported.21
Conductivity. Temperature-dependent single-crystal conductivity
measurements were carried out following the standard four-probe
technique. Electrical contacts were obtained by gluing four gold wires
to the crystal with Emetron M8001 gold paint. The sample mounted
on a Motorola printed circuit was placed in an Oxford Instruments
model CF 200 continuous-flow cryostat. Temperature control and
temperature-resistance data acquisition were achieved using an Oxford
Instruments model DTC2 PID temperature controller, and a Hewlett-
Packard model 4263A LCR meter, respectively, both driven by a
personal computer running in-house software. Powder conductivity
measurements were carried out on pressed pellets of pure powder
materials (size: 1 mm2 × about 1 mm) obtained by careful grinding.
The cylinders used to press the materials were used as electrodes.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis. Every material presented in this study is obtained
by slow diffusion of [Ni(dmit)2]- anions through a solution
containing the appropriate [C]+ countercation. Contrary to what
was reported in our previous paper based on TCNQ0/TCNQ-
mixed-valence species, the highly unsoluble neutral [Ni(dmit)2]
compound is not a convenient starting material. The syntheses
have to be carried out with [Ni(dmit)2]- as the only nickel-
containing species allowed to react with [C]+. After 2 months
of slow diffusion, two types of single crystals were obtained
with [C1]+: black elongated plates designated hereafter as phase
1, and diamond-shaped dark solid designated hereafter as phase
2. Both phases have been characterized by X-ray diffraction
studies (see below) as having the same 1:1 [C1][Ni(dmit)2]
stoichiometry. Likewise, two types of single crystals were
obtained with [C2]+, as thick plates and square plates labeled
hereafter phase 3 and 4 respectively, and having the same 1:1
[C2][Ni(dmit)2] stoichiometry, as shown by X-ray studies.
Description of Structures. [C1][Ni(dmit)2] (Phase 1). The
asymmetric unit is shown in Figure 1 with the atomic numbering
scheme used. It consists of two planar [Ni(dmit)2] entities
labeled A and B, (largest deviations from planarity are 0.106
Å for S(5) in A and 0.072 for S(15) in B) and two [C1]+ cations.
No atoms are in special positions. A collection of some relevant
intramolecular distances is given in Table 2 for the [Ni(dmit)2]
species. The mean Ni-S distances are 2.165(1) and 2.164(1)
Å for molecules A and B, respectively, which is somewhat larger
than those observed for other compounds of general formula
[Cat]+[Ni(dmit)2]- were [Cat]+ is a closed-shell cation. For
comparison, the Ni-S distances observed for [Cat]+ ) [NMe4]+,
[NEt4]+, [NPr4]+, and [NBu4]+ are 2.158(3),22 2.157(4),23 2.160-
(3),22 and 2.15624 Å, respectively. However, this result is in
agreement with the situation encountered in [C6H11N2]+-
4-(dimethylamino)-1-methylpyridinium [C1]+,12 4-[2-(4-(dimethyl-
amino)phenyl)ethenyl]-1-methylpyridinium [C2]+,13 and 4-[4-(4-(di-
methylamino)phenyl)-1,3-butadienyl]-1-methylpyridinium [C3]+,14,15
were synthesized as previously described. Elemental analyses were
performed by the “Service de Microanalyses du Laboratoire de Chimie
de Coordination” in Toulouse, France.
Synthesis. Crystals were obtained by slow interdiffusion of saturated
solution of (n-Bu4N)[Ni(dmit)2] and [C1]+I- or [C2]+I-. These experi-
ments were carried out under argon, in a three-compartment H-tube
equipped with porous glass frits between the compartments. The
concentrations of the solutions were kept close to saturation during
the diffusion process by means of additional porous containers placed
in the appropriate compartment and filled with an excess of solid starting
reagents. Attempts to grow crystals from [C3]+I- were unsuccessful
and, therefore, [C3][Ni(dmit)2] has been obtained as powder samples
only. Anal. Calcd for C22H21N2NiS10: C, 40.22; H, 2.95; N, 3.91.
Found: C, 41.7; H, 2.6; N, 4.0.
Structure Analysis and Refinement. The structures were solved
by direct methods (SHELXS86)16 and refined by least-squares proce-
dures. Crystallographic data for [C1][Ni(dmit)2] and [C2][Ni(dmit)2]
are summarized in Table 1. The calculations were carried out with
the CRYSTALS package programs17 running on a PC. The drawings
of the molecular structures were obtained with the help of CAM-
ERON.17 The atomic scattering factors were taken from International
Tables for X-ray Crystallography.18 Full X-ray data, fractional atomic
coordinates, and the equivalent thermal parameters for all atoms and
(11) (a) Steimecke, G.; Sieler, H. J.; Kirmse R.; Hoyer, E. Phosphorous
Sulfur 1979, 7, 49. (b) Valade, L.; Legros, J. P.; Bousseau, M.;
Cassoux, P.; Garbauskas M.; Interrante, L. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1985, 783.
(12) Rollema, H.; Johnson, E. A.; Booth, R. G.; Caldera, P.; Lampen, P.;
Youngster, S. K.; Trevor, A. J.; Naiman N.; Castagnoli, N. J. Med.
Chem. 1990, 33, 2221.
(13) Kung, T. K. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1978, 25, 131.
(14) Duan, X. M.; Okada, S.; Oikawa, H.; Matsuda H.; Nakanishi, H. Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1995, 267, 89.
(15) Matsui, M.; Kawamura, S.; Shibata, K.; Muramatsu, H. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 71.
(19) (a) Hoffmann, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1397. (b) Ammeter, J. H.;
B.; Bu¨rgi, H. B.; Thibeault, J.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978,
100, 3686.
(16) Sheldrick G. M. SHELXS86: Program for Crystal Structure Solution;
University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1986.
(17) (a) Watkin, D. J.; Prout, C. K.; Carruthers, J. R.; Betteridge, P. W.
CRYSTALS, Issue 10; Chemical Crystallography Laboratory, University
of Oxford: Oxford, England, 1996. (b) Watkin, D. J.; Prout, C. K.;
Pearce, L. J. CAMERON; Chemical Crystallography Laboratory,
University of Oxford: Oxford, England, 1996.
(20) Whangbo, M.-H.; Hoffman, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 6093.
(21) Canadell, E.; Rachidi, I. E.-I.; Ravy, S.; Pouget, J. P.; Brossard, L.;
Legros, J. P., J. Phys. France 1989, 50, 2967.
(22) van Diemen, J. H.; Groeneveld, L. R.; Lind, A.; de Graaff, R. A. G.;
Haasnoot, J. G.; Reedijk, J. Acta Crystallogr. 1988, C44, 1898.
(23) Groeneveld, L. R.; Schuller, B.; Kramer, G. J.; Haasnoot, J. G.;
Reedijk, J. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas 1986, 105, 507.
(24) Lindqvist, O.; Andersen, L.; Sieler, H. J.; Steimecke, G.; Hoyer, E.
Acta Chem. Scand. 1982, A36, 855.
(18) Cromer, D. T.; Waber, J. T. International Tables for X-ray Crystal-
lography; Kynoch Press: Birmingham, 1974; Vol. 4.