vs. SCE. By considering the literature data,5,15 we attribute
this wave to the ruthenium(II)Èruthenium(III) couple:
RuII(PPh ) (dcbipy)Cl ¡ RuIII(PPh ) (dcbipy)Cl ] e~ (1)
3 2
2
3 2
2
For this couple, the anodic-cathodic peak current ratio (i /i )
pa pc
is equal to 1.0, indicating stability of the oxidized complex.
The anodic peak current i is proportional to the square root
p
of the scan rate (v") and the peak potential values E and E
pa
pc
are independent of the scan rate. The peak-to-peak separation
(*E \ E [ E ) as well as the di†erence o E [ E o are
p
pa
pc
p
p@2
both about 60 mV, as expected for a completely reversible
one-electron transfer process.
Fig. 1 Structure of the Ru(PPh ) (dcbipy)Cl complex
3 2
2
TiO nanocrystalline thin Ðlms, prepared by a sol-gel tech-
2
nique, were readily red-colored, after simple immersion in a
10~4 M solution of the complex in acetone or ethanol. It is
now widely accepted that dcbipy serves as an interlocking
group between the molecular “antennaÏ (the complex) and the
semiconductorÏs surface through an ester-like linkage between
the wCOOH group and the surface hydroxyl groups of
in-plane CwH wags).11 On the other hand, in the Raman
spectrum, the coupled symmetrical carbonyl stretch appears
at 1315 cm~1. The presence of PPh is conÐrmed by the
3
existence of some characteristic ring vibration modes (the
assignment of the characteristic vibration modes of PPh
are based upon the classic work of Whi†en on
3
TiO .3,16 The characterization of these sensitized cells by in
2
situ resonance Raman spectroscopy,17 under real photo-
monohalogenobenzenes).12 The results are in very good agree-
current conditions, conÐrmed the immutability of the dye
Raman spectra and revealed a reversible dependence of the
intensities of the bands on the polarization potential. The
observed photocurrents are satisfactorily high and very stable
while the photocurrent action spectrum matches well the
absorption spectrum of the complex. A detailed exploration of
the photoelectrochemical properties is now in progress.
ment with the data reported for (PPh ) RuIICl and other
3 3
related compounds.13 Compared to the free phosphine, we
note small shifts of the bands, due to complexation. Moreover,
there is a band at 427 cm~1 probably due to a RuIIwN
stretch.
The electronic spectrum (Perkin-Elmer Lambda 16) of the
complex (Fig. 2) displays two broad maxima in the visible
region at 521 and 413 nm, with molar extinction coefficients
3400 and 5800 M~1 cm~1, respectively, and a sharp increase
in the near UV region. No spectral changes were observed,
even after continuous illumination with visible light for several
days. It is now well-established that the two intense low
energy-bands are assigned to allowed metal-to-ligand charge-
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. A. Koutsodimou, Dr. S.
Coinis, Dr. F. Zanikos, Dr. G. Pistolis, X. Teas and E. Lyris
for their generous assistance.
transfer transitions of the type d (Ru) ] p*(dcbipy), which are
characteristic of N-heterocyclic complexes of ruthenium(II).
p
References
Similar assignments have been proposed for analogous com-
plexes.10,14 In contrast, no emission was detected in the solid
state and in ethanolic solutions (Perkin-Elmer LS50B and
Jasco FP-777). This may be due to a very short-lived excited
state and it is not unexpected for the family of RuÈdcbipy
complexes.2
1 B. OÏRegan and M. Graetzel, Nature (L ondon), 1991, 353, 737.
2 M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, R. Humphry-Baker, E.
Muller, P. Liska, N. Vlachopoulos and M. Graetzel, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 6382 and references therein.
3 K. Vinodgopal, X. Hua, R. L. Dahlgren, A. G. Lappin, L. K.
Patterson and P. V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 10883.
4 H. A. Nieuwenhuis, D. J. Stufkens, R. A. McNicholl, A. H. R.
Al-Obaidi, C. G. Coates, S. E. J. Bell, J. J. McGarvey, J. Westwell,
M. W. George and J. J. Turner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5579.
5 B. P. Sullivan, D. J. Salmon and T. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 1978
17, 3334.
The chemical stability and the electrochemical reversibility
of the complex are essential for its use as a sensitizer in regen-
erative photoelectrochemical cells. For this reason, electron-
transfer properties of Ru(PPh ) (dcbipy)Cl have been studied
6 J. Chakravarty and S. Bhattacharya, Polyhedron, 1994, 13, 2671.
7 P. S. Hallman, T. A. Stephenson and G. Wilkinson, Inorg. Synth.,
1970, 12, 237.
3 2
2
in DMF solution by cyclic voltammetry. The voltammogram,
taken in the region of interest (inset in Fig. 2), shows an oxida-
tion peak whose half-wave potential E is centered at ]0.64 V
8 Italics denote bands from the dcbipy ligand.
"
9 The Raman spectrum was taken using many di†erent excitation
wavelengths. The best results were attained by using the green
argon line at 514.5 nm. Since the absorption maximum of the
complex lies at 521 nm, we are very near resonance Raman condi-
tions.
10 R. Prasad, Polyhedron, 1995, 14, 2151.
11 T. J. Meyer, G. J. Meyer, B. W. Pfennig, J. R. Schoonover, C. J.
Timpson, J. F. Wall, C. Kobusch, X. Chen, B. M. Peek, C. J. Wall,
W. Ou , B. Erickson and C. A. Bignozzi, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33,
3952.
12 P. F. Whi†en, J. Chem. Soc., 1956, 1350.
13 H. G. M. Edwards, I. R. Lewis and P. H. Turner, Inorg. Chim.
Acta., 1994, 216, 191.
14 H. E. Toma, P. Santos and A. Bolanos, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1988,
124.
E / V vs. SCE
15 M. Haga, Md. M. Ali, S. Koseki, K. Fujimoto, A. Yoshimura, K.
Nozaki, T. Ohno, K. Nakajima and D. J. Stufkens, Inorg. Chem.,
1996, 35, 3335.
16 P. Falaras, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells, in press.
17 A. Hugot-Le Go†, S. Joiret, P. Falaras and A. P. Xagas, Electro-
chim. Acta, submitted.
Wavelength / nm
Fig. 2 UV/VIS absorption spectrum of a 10~3 M solution of the
Ru(PPh ) (dcbipy)Cl complex in DMF. Inset: cyclic voltammogram
3 2
2
of the same solution (degassed), containing 0.2 M [(n-C H ) N]ClO .
4
9 4
4
Received in Montpellier, France, 30th December 1997;
Paper 8/00779I
Scan rate: 50 mV s~1, working electrode: Pt wire, counter electrode:
planar Pt electrode, reference: saturated calomel electrode (SCE)
558
New J. Chem., 1998, Pages 557È558