R. Gup et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1129 (2017) 142e151
143
complex having N,N,N-1,2,3-triazole 1-oxide ligand moiety and
investigation of the DNA binding and cleavage activities of both
ligand and its nickel complex.
absolute ethanol (15 mL) with stirring. The reaction mixture was
refluxed for 2 h, and then the resulting green precipitate was
filtered off, washed with absolute ethanol and small amount of cold
water, and then dried in vacuum. The crystals, unsuitable for X-ray
diffraction, were obtained upon diffusion of the ethyl ether into the
DMF solution after 3 weeks. Yield: 76%; M.p.: 277 ꢁC. UV (DMF, nm);
270 and 348; FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1) 3429, 3112 (triazole), 3031, 2942,
(CeH), 1643 (C]O), 1605 and 1498 (C]N), 1189 (CeN), 947 (NeO);
Analysis (%calculated/found) for C23H24Cl2N6NiO2 C: 50.59/50.92,
H: 4.43/4.48, N:15.39/15.44, Cl: 12.98/12.69, Ni: 10.75/10.24.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Material and methods
All the reagents and solvents were of reagent-grade quality and
purchased from commercial suppliers. All aqueous solutions were
prepared with deionized water, which had been passed through a
Millipore Milli-Q Plus water purification system. Calf thymus DNA
(CT-DNA) was purchased from Sigma- Aldrich. pBR322 DNA was
purchased from Fermantas. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded
on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer in DMSO_d6 with TMS as the
internal standard. IR spectra were recorded on pure solid samples
with a Thermo-Scientific, as KBR pellets. The electronic spectra of
the ligands and complexes were recorded on a PG Instruments
T80 þ UV/Vis Spectrophotometer. Carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen
analyses were carried out on a LECO 932 CHNS analyzer and nickel
content was determined via atomic absorption spectroscopy using
the DV 2000 Perkin Elber ICP-AES. Mass spectra were recorded on a
Waters Xevo TQ-S UPLC-MS/MS spectrometer. Room temperature
magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out on
powdered samples using a Sherwood Scientific MK1 Model Gouy
Magnetic Susceptibility Balance. The thermogravimetric analysis
2.4. X-ray diffraction study
Crystallographic data were recorded on a Bruker Smart Breeze
CCD diffractometer using MoKa radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 Å) at
T ¼ 296(2) K [36]. Absorption corrections by multi-scan were
applied [36,37]. Cell refinement was carried out using Bruker SAINT
and data were reduced by using Bruker SAINT [36]. The structure
was solved using SHELXS97 [38] and refined using SHELXL2014
[39] by full-matrix least-squares on F2 against ALL reflections. The
weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2. The
threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating
R-factors. All estimated standard deviations (e.s.d.’s) are calculated
using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.’s is taken into ac-
count individually in the estimation of e.s.d.’s in distances, angles,
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.’s in cell parameters
are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. Molec-
ular graphics were drawn ORTEP-3 [40] and PLATON [40], and the
material for publication prepared using WinGX [41]. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically and hydrogen atoms
were added according to the theoretical model. A summary of the
experimental details and selected results for the title compound are
given in Table 1. The fractional atomic coordinates are given in
Table S1 and also the selected bond distance, bond angles, and
torsion angles are given in Table 2.
was carried out in dynamic nitrogen atmosphere (20 mL minꢀ1
)
with a heating rate of 20 ꢁC minꢀ1 using a Perkin Elmer Pyris 1 TGA
thermal analyzer at Mugla Sitki Kocman University. Crystallo-
graphic data were recorded on a Bruker Smart Breeze CCD area-
detector diffractometer in Science and Technology Application
and Research Center at Aksaray University, Turkey. 4-
methylisonitrosoacetophenone
[33,34]
and
4-
methylisonitrosoacetophenone hydrazone [35] were synthesized
as described in previously reported methods.
2.2. Synthesis of 2-(di(pyridin-2-yl)methyl)-4-(p-tolyl)-2H-1,2,3-
triazole 1-oxide (L)
2.5. DNA binding
2.5.1. Electronic absorption titrations
Dipyridyl ketone (10 mmol, 0.184 g) dissolved in absolute
ethanol (30 mL) was added drop wise to a solution of 4-
methylisonitrosoacetophenone hydrazone (10 mmol, 0.177 g) in
absolute ethanol (20 mL) with a catalytic amount of glacial acetic
acid at room temperature. The reaction mixture was refluxed for
further 4 h. Then, the reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrated
was allowed at room temperature for crystallization of the 1,2,3-
triazole 1-oxide compound. After 4 days, the cream crystals suit-
able for X-ray diffraction were formed, collected by filtration,
washed with small amount of diethyl ether and then dried in
vacuum. The ligand is soluble in common organic solvents and
insoluble in water.
All the experiments involving the interaction of the complexes
with CT-DNA were carried out in water buffer containing 5 mM tris
[tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane] and 50 mM NaCl, and
adjusted to pH 7.3 with HCl. The solution of CT-DNA in the buffer
gave a ratio of UV absorbance of 1.8e1.9:1 at 260 and 280 nm,
indicating that the CT-DNA was sufficiently free of protein [42]. The
CT-DNA concentration per nucleotide was determined spectro-
photometrically by employing an extinction coefficient of
6600 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1 at 260 nm [43]. An appropriate amount of the
compound was dissolved in a solvent mixture of 1% DMF and 99%
triseHCl buffer. Absorption titration experiments were performed
by maintaining the compound concentration as constant (25
while the concentration of the CT-DNA gradually increased within
6.25e50 M.
mM)
Yield 85%; Mp 175e176 ꢁC; UV (DMF, nm) 268 and 324; IR (KBr,
cmꢀ1) 3149 (triazole), 3043, 2947 (CeH), 1588 and 1525 (C]N),
m
1188 (CeN), 945 (NeO); 1H NMR (DMSO_d6, ppm)
d 2.34 (s, 3H),
7.31 (d, 2H AreH), 7.35 (m, 2H, Py-H), 7.45 (m, 2H, Py-H), 7.49 (s, H
CeH), 7.65 (d, 2H, AreH), 7.85, (m, 2H, Py-H), 8.40 (s, H, CH]N),
8.60 (m, 2H, Py-H); 13C NMR (DMSO_d6, ppm) 155, 149, 144 (C]N),
139, 137, 129.5, 126, 125, 123.5, 123.6, 113 (AreC), 66 (CeN), 21
(CH3). Analysis (% calculated/found) for C20H17N5O C: 69.96/70.24,
H: 4.99/4.98, N: 20.40/20.43.
2.5.2. Viscosity measurements
Viscosity experiments were carried out using an Ubbelodhe
viscometer at room temperature. The viscosity of CT-DNA solution
(25
mM) was measured in the absence and presence of increasing
amounts of the compound (6,25e50
m
M) in tris-HCl buffer (10 mM
triseHCl-NaCl; pH ¼ 7.6) containing %5 DMF solution. Flow time
2.3. Synthesis of Ni(II) complex ([Ni(L)(DMF)Cl2])
was measured three times via a digital stopwatch. Viscosity values
1/3
were presented as (
h
/h0
)
versus concentrations of [complex]/
A solution of 1 mmol NiCl2$6H2O (0.2377 g) in EtOH (10 mL) was
[DNA] [44,45] where
h was the viscosity value for DNA in presence
added to a hot solution containing 1 mmol ligands (0.343 g) in
of the compounds and h0 was the viscosity value of CT-DNA alone.