5324
S. A. Rodríguez, M. T. Baumgartner / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5322–5324
8. Kadnikov, D. V.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9423; Jia, C.; Piao, D.;
In summary, we have described an efficient and facile route for
Kitamura, T.; Fujiwara, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7516–7522; Luo, Y.; Wu, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2103–2105; Zhang, L.; Meng, T.; Fan, R.; Wu, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 7279–7286.
the synthesis of 3-aryl-4-substituted coumarins from commer-
cially available, easily handled, and inexpensive reactants via pho-
toinduced radical nucleophilic substitution under mild conditions
with good yields. The substrates tolerate many functional groups.
Moreover, the reaction provides an alternative access to the tetra-
cyclic system 8 in moderate yields.
9. Zhu, Q.; Wu, J.; Fathi, R.; Yang, Z. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3333–3336.
10. Rossi, R. A.; Peñéñory, A. B.; Pierini, A. B. In The Chemistry of Functional Groups,
Supplement D2; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, 1994. Chapter
24; Rossi, R. A.; Peñéñory, A. B.; Pierini, A. B. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 71–168;
Pierini, A. B.; Peñéñory, A. B.; Baumgartner, M. T. In Electron Transfer Reactions
in Organic Synthesis; Vanelle, P., Ed.; 2002; pp 63–87. ISBN: 81-7736-086-8.
11. Tempesti, T.; Pierini, A. B.; Baumgartner, M. T. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6508–
6511; Rossi, R. A.; Baumgartner, M. T.. In Synthesis of Heterocycles by the SRN1.
Targets in Heterocyclic Systems; Attanasi, O. A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Società Quimica
Italiana: Roma, 1999; Vol. 3, pp 215–243.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Agencia Córdoba Ciencia (ACC),
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONI-
CET), and Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología (SECyT), Universidad
Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Argentina. S.A.R. thanks CONICET for
the award of a fellowship.
12. Baumgartner, M. T.; Tempesti, T. C.; Pierini, A. B. Arkivock 2003, part (X), 420–
433.
13. The reactions were carried out in a 50 mL three-neck round-bottomed flask
equipped with a nitrogen inlet and a magnetic stirrer. To 20 mL of dry and
degassed DMSO under nitrogen were added potassium tert-butoxide (1.456 g,
13 mmol) and then 4-hydroxycoumarin (1.620 g, 10 mmol). After 15 min 4-
iodoanisole (234 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was
irradiated for 180 min. The reaction was quenched with an excess of
ammonium nitrate and water (30 mL). The mixture was extracted three
times with methylene chloride (20 mL); the organic extract was washed twice
with water, dried (MgSO4), the reduction products (ArH) were quantified by GC
in this extract and compared with authentic commercial samples; the
remaining aqueous phase was acidified with nitric acid 65% P/V to pH 3–4,
the precipitate was filtered with low pressure and redissolved with acetone.
Products were isolated by column or radial chromatography [hexane/ethyl
acetate (1:1 or 1.5:1)] and characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NNR and mass
spectrometry. All products are known and exhibited physical properties
identical to those reported in the literature.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (general methods and materials. 1H NMR
and 13C NMR spectra and MS of compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 6, 8
and 9) associated with this article can be found, in the online ver-
References and notes
ꢂ
14. Entrainment is useful when Nu1 is rather unreactive at initiation (Eq. 1), but
ꢂ
1. Jung, J.; Park, O. Molecules 2009, 14, 4790–4803; Luchini, A. C.; Rodrigues-Orsi,
P.; Cestari, S. H.; Seito, L. N.; Witaicenis, A.; Pellizzon, C. H.; Stasi, L. C. D. Biol.
Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1343–1350; Chohan, Z. H.; Shaikh, A. U.; Rauf, A. J. Enzyme
Inhib. Med. Chem. 2006, 21, 741–748; Kirkiacharian, B. S.; Clercq, E.; Kurkjian,
R.; Pannecouque, C. J. Pharm. Chem. 2008, 42, 265–270; Danchev, N. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 41, 882–890; Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Fathi, R.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, L. U.S.
Patent 6 703 514, 2004.; Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Fathi, R.; Zhu, Q. U.S. Patent 7 148 253,
2006.
2. Bulut, M.; Erk, C. Dyes Pigments 1996, 30, 99–104; Kang, H.; Kwon, K. S.; Kang,
D.; Lee, J. C. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2007, 208, 1853–1861.
3. Garcia, M.; Kano, M. H. C.; Viera, D. M.; Do Naacimento, M. C.; Mors, W. B.
Phytochemistry 1986, 25, 2425. and references cited therein; Yankep, E.;
Fomum, Z. T.; Bisrat, D.; Dagne, E.; Hellwig, V.; Steglich, W. Phytochemistry
1998, 49, 2521–2523.
quite reactive at coupling (Eq. 3). Under these conditions the other Nu2
(KBuO-t), more reactive at initiation but not reactive in the coupling reaction, is
ꢂ
added. Nu2 increases the generation of radical intermediates which are
ꢂ
coupled with the more reactive nucleophile Nu1
.
15. Tempesti, T. C.; Pierini, A. B.; Baumgartner, M. T. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1523–
1528.
16. For regioselectivity of the coupling between aryl radicals and arylhydroxy
anions, see: Baumgartner, M. T.; Blanco, G. A.; Pierini, A. B. New J. Chem. 2008,
32, 464–471.
17. The equation used in the relative reactivity determination of pairs of
nucleophiles versus a radical is as follows:
k1 lnð½Nu1ꢃ0=½Nu1ꢃtÞ
¼
k2 lnð½Nu2ꢃ0=½Nu2ꢃtÞ
4. Hamdi, N.; Saoud, M.; Romerosa, A. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2007, 11, 283–301;
Hamdi, N.; Saoud, M.; Romerosa, A.; Hassen, R. B. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2008, 45,
1835–1841; Martinez, R.; Cortes, E.; Toscano, R. A.; Alfaro, L. A. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1990, 27, 1273–1276.
where [Nu1]0 and [Nu2]0 are initial concentrations and [Nu1]t and [Nu2]t are
concentrations at time t of both nucleophiles. This equation is based on a
first-order reaction of both anions with the phenyl radicals, see: Bunnett, J. F.
In Investigation of Rates and Mechanisms of Reactions, 3rd ed.; Lewis, E. S., Ed.;
Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1974, part 1, p 159.
5. Van Zante, B.; Nauta, W. T. Recl. Trav. Chim. Bas 1961, 80, 95.
6. Mathur, K. B. L.; Sawhney, K. N. Indian J. Chem. 1976, 14B, 518.
7. Barton, D. H. R.; Donnelly, D. M. X.; Finet, J.-P.; Guiry, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 1539–1542.