Chemistry Letters 2002
1213
OR
CO2CH3
Ph
CO2CH3
OR
H
The clay catalyst recovered from this reaction can be recycled
three times after activating the clay by heating at 100 ꢁC for 3 h. In
conclusion, we have demonstrated that mont. K10 clay is a useful,
speedy and efficient catalyst for the protection/isomerisation of the
Baylis–Hillman adducts with a variety of alcohols which provide
highly functionalized stereoselective (E)-alkenyl ethers. These
ethers are good candidates for the synthesis of lignan natural
products and useful substrates for RCM reactions. Further studies
involving the above catalyst system are underway.
a
Ph
95%
R=H, 1
R=H, 7
R=OAc, 8
R=OAc, 6
b
b
>95%
>95%, 99.9% E-selectivity
CO2CH3
O
H
+
Ph
Ph
O
CO2CH3
3 40%
60%
2
P.S. thanks Department of Science and Technology (DST),
New Delhi for the financial support as Fast Track Young Scientist
Project-2001. The authors thank Prof. Javed Iqbal, Director and Dr.
Mangalam S. Nair, Head, Organic Division for their encouragement
and infrastructure facilities provided. P.R. thanks CSIR (New
Delhi)for the award of Junior Research Fellowship.
Reagents and Conditions: a. 60% w/w Mont. K10, Neat, 2 h, 75 °C.
b. 60% w/w Mont. K10, propargyl alcohol, Neat, 6 h, 75 °C.
Scheme 3.
optimized condition described above can be achieved by increasing
the reaction time (Scheme 4). Complete conversion of 2 into
isomerised product 3 was observed at the reaction time 24 h and was
purified by passing through a silica gel column chromatography.
The distribution of products with respect to reaction time is
summarized in Table 1.
References and Notes
#
Present address: JSPS Fellow, Division of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science,
Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan.
1
a)M. Balogh and P. Laszlo, ‘‘Organic Chemistry Using Clays,’’ Springer-Verlag,
New York (1993). b) G. W. Kabalka and R. M. Pagni, Tetrahedron, 53, 7999
(1997). c) A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 95, 559 (1995).
OH
As time increases
CO2CH3
O
CO2CH3
H
a
+
Ph
2
a)S. E. Derewes and G. H. P. Roos, Tetrahedron, 44, 4653 (1988). b) E. Cignek, in
‘‘Organic Reactions,’’ ed. by L. A. Paquette, Wiley & Sons, New York (1997),
Vol. 51, pp 201–350. c)H. M. R. Hofmann, U. Eggert, and W. Poly, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 26, 1015 (1987). d) D. Basavaiah, K. Muthukumaran, and B.
Sreenivasulu, Synthesis, 2000, 545. e)D. Basavaiah, K. Padmaja, and T.
Satyanarayana, Synthesis, 2000, 1662, and references cited therein. f)H. S. Kim,
T. Y. Kim, K. Y. Ley, Y. M. Chung, H. J. Lee, and J. N. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., 41,
2613 (2000). g) A. Foucaud and F. E. Guemmount, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1989,
403. h)D. Basavaiah, M. Krishnamacharyulu, R. S. Hyma., P. K. S. Sarma, and N.
Kumaragurubaran, J. Org. Chem., 64, 1197 (1999). i) J. N. Kim and K. Y. Lee,
Curr. Org. Chem., 6, 627 (2002).
Ph
Ph
O
CO2CH3
1
2
(E:Z=99.9:0.1)
3
Reagents and Conditions: a. 60% w/w Mont. K10, 2.5 equvi. propargyl alcohol, Neat, 75 °C, 2 h.
Scheme 4.
Table 1.
Time(h)
2(%)
3(%)
3
a)P. Shanmugam and V. Nair, Synth. Commun., 26, 3007 (1996). b) P.
Shanmugam, Synth. Commun., 29, 4409 (1999). c) P. Shanmugam and R. L.
Varma, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B, 40B, 1258 (2001). d) P. Shanmugam and P. R.
Singh, Synlett, 2001, 1314.
N. G. Lewis and L. B. Davin, in ‘‘Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry,’’
ed. by D. Barton, K. Nakanishi, and O. Meth-Cohn, Pergamon Press, Oxford
(1999), Vol. 1, pp 639–712.
a)P. Shanmugam and P. Rajasingh, under preparation. b)B. Giese, ‘‘Radicals in
Organic Synthesis: Formation of Carbon–Carbon Bonds,’’ Pergamon Press,
Oxford (1986). c) J. Fossey, D. Lefort, and J. Sorba, ‘‘Free Radicals in Organic
Chemistry,’’ Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1995). d) C. P. Jasperse, D. P. Curran, and
T. L. Fevig, Chem. Rev., 91, 1237 (1991). e) S. Janardhanam, P. Shanmugam, and
K. Rajagopalan, J. Org. Chem., 58, 7782 (1993). f) P. Shanmugam, R. Srinivasan,
and K. Rajagopalan, Tetrahedron, 53, 6085 (1997). g) P. Shanmugam, R.
Srinivasan, and K. Rajagopalan, Tetrahedron, 53, 11685 (1997).
6
42
25
58
75
15
22
24
<5
trace
>95
>99
4
5
In order to exemplify the general nature of this reaction, we
have chosen a number of alcohols and found that the reactions are
clean and high yielding (11–17)under the optimized conditions
described above (Scheme 5). However, the reaction with phenols
and high boiling alcohols furnished a mixture of inseparable
compounds in poor yield. The results are summarized in Table 2.
6
7
D. Basavaiah, N. Kumaragurubaran, D. S. Sharada, and R. M. Reddy,
Tetrahedron, 57, 8167 (2001).
R
Z
OH
H
O
The 1H NMR spectra of the isomerised product 3 showed a peak at ꢀ 7.92 for the
presence of E-vinylic proton.
a
Z
+
Ph
Ph
90%
Ph
The product ratio was estimated by 1H NMR.
O
R
8
9
1
Z
9,10
11-17 (E:Z=99.9:0.1)
A Typical Procedure: A slurry of the adduct 1 (150 mg, 1.3 mmol), propargyl
alcohol (182 mg, 2.5 equiv., 3.25 mmole)and montmorillonite K10 clay (60% w/
w)was taken in a 50 mL RB flask which was tightly closed and kept in an oil bath
(75 ꢁC)for 24 h. Then the flask was cooled to room temperature and 20 mL of
CH2Cl2 was added and filtered through a celite pad. The solvent was removed
under vacuum. The crude mixture was purified through a column of silica gel
using 98 : 2 mixture of hexane: ethyl acetate afforded 95% isomerised compound
3 with 99.9% E-selectivity. By adjusting the reaction time (1.5 h), propargyl ether
derivative 2 can be isolated in 60% yield along with the isomerised product 3. 3-
aryl-2-methylene-3(prop-2-en-1-yloxy) propeonitrile 9: IR (neat) ꢁmax: 1728,
R=propargyl, allyl, isopropyl, n-octyl
Z= CO2Et, CO2Me, CN
Reagents and Conditions: a. 60% w/w Mont. K10, 2.5 equiv. R-OH, 75 °C, 24 h, Neat
Scheme 5.
Table 2. Isomerisation of Baylis–Hillman adducts with alcoholsa,b,c
Alcohol
Z
Product
Yield/%d
Propargyl
CO2Me
CO2Et
CN
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
95
96
96
95
95
98
97
1600, 1630, 1620 cmꢂ1 1H NMR (CDCl3/TMS, 300.1 MHz): ꢀ 3.93 (d, 2H,
;
00
00
J ¼ 5:67 Hz), 4.87 (s, 1H), 5.23 (s, 2H), 5.84 (m, 1H), 5.97 (s, 2H), 7.35 (m, 5H);
13C NMR (CDCl3/TMS, 75.3 MHz): ꢀ 69.75, 80.09, 107.23, 117.77, 127.03,
128.80, 128.83, 129.70, 130.01, 133.72, 137.65; MS m/z: 199 (Mþ); Anal. Calcd
for C13H13NO: Cacld. C, 78.36, H, 6.58, N, 7.03% Found: C, 78.30, H, 6.55, N,
7.00%; Methyl (2E)3-aryl-2(prop-2-yn-1-yloxymethyl) prop-2-enoate 11: IR
(neat) ꢁmax: 3285, 2112, 1714, 1633 cmꢂ1; 1H NMR (CDCl3/TMS, 300.1 MHz): ꢀ
2.42(t, 1H, J ¼ 2:34 Hz), 3.84 (s, 3H), 4.26 (d, 2H, J ¼ 2:34 Hz), 4.39 (s, 2H),
7.32 (m, 3H), 7.53 (m, 2H), 7.92 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3/TMS, 75.3 MHz): ꢀ
52.26, 58.08, 64.25,74.70, 79.63, 128.51, 128.54, 129.55, 129.99, 134.51, 145.27,
167.98; MS m/z: 230 (Mþ); Anal. Calcd for C14H14O3: C, 73.03, H, 6.13% Found:
C, 73.00, H, 6.08%.
Allyl
Isopropyl
n-Octyl
00
CO2Me
CO2Me
CN
CO2Me
a60% w/w mont. K10 clay was used. bThe clay was dried at 100 ꢁC for
1 h. c60% mont-K10, 75 ꢁC, 24 h. dIsolated yield after column
purification.