A.A. Bessonov et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 693 (2008) 2572–2578
2573
have been characterized by elemental analysis, mass spectrometry,
X-ray, IR, and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Complexes 1 and 3 were de-
scribed earlier [28], but there were not details in structure and
thermal behavior. Dimethylgold(III) salicylaldimine chelates are
air and moisture stable and don’t require special conditions for
storage. The compounds are soluble in most common organic sol-
vents, have low-melting points and evaporate almost quantita-
tively at low temperatures in a vacuum. Our investigations report
that dimethylgold(III) complexes with N-substituted salicylaldi-
mines are viable precursors for MOCVD of gold materials.
The yield of complex 2 was 90%, m.p. 78–79 °C. Dimethyl-
gold(III) N-iso-propyl-salicylaldiminate (2) has been prepared for
the first time. Spectral data for 2: IR (m, cmÀ1) (C–H)(Au–CH3)
2977 m, 2907 m; (C@N) 1624 vs; (C–O) 1174 m, 1150 m, 1127
m. 1H NMR d 0.94 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 1.22 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 1.35
(d, 6H, CH3), d 4.35 (m, 1H, N–CH), d 6.55–7.40 (4H, ArH), d 8.24
(s, 1H, N@C–H). Anal. Calc. for C12H18AuNO: C, 37.0; H, 4.7; N,
3.6. Found: C, 37.2; H, 4.6; N, 3.6%.
The yield of complex 3 was 85%, m. p. 111–112 °C (lit. data
114 °C [28]). Spectral data for 3: IR (m, cmÀ1) (C–H)(Au–CH3)
2921 s, 2853 m; (C@N) 1618 vs; (C–O) 1189 m, 1143 m, 1128 w.
1H NMR d 0.92 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 1.21 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 1.35–
2.04 (10H, CH2), d 3.82 (m, 1H, N–CH), d 6.53–7.40 (4H, ArH), d
8.20 (s, 1H, N@C–H). Anal. Calc. for C15H22AuNO: C, 42.0; H, 5.2;
N, 3.3. Found: C, 42.1; H, 5.2; N, 3.4%.
2. Experimental
2.1. General information and materials
Dimethylgold(III) iodide [Me2AuI]2 was prepared from KAuCl4
(P98%) using the method [29]. Salicylaldimines HSal@N–R
(R = methyl, iso-propyl, or cyclohexyl) were synthesized from sali-
cylaldehyde (Fluka, purum, P98%) and alkylamines (Merck, pur-
iss., P99%) by the literature procedure [30]. All reactions were
carried out using Schlenk techniques.
2.3. X-ray crystallography
X-ray powder pattern diffraction data were collected on a
DRON-3M diffractometer using Cu Ka-radiation in 2h angles range
of 5–50° at 296 K. X-ray diffraction data reveal a monophase sys-
tem for complexes 1–3. Single-crystal X-ray studies were per-
Elemental analyses were performed on a Carlo Erba 1106
instrument. IR spectra were recorded in KBr on a FT-IR Scimitar
FTS 2000. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on an MSL Bruker 300
spectrometer; with CDCl3 as solvent. Melting points were deter-
mined by Kofler m.p. apparatus.
The saturated vapour pressure of complexes 1–3 was measured
by the Knudsen effusion procedure combined with mass spectro-
metric analysis of the gas phase composition. Detailed descriptions
of the measurement method, calibration procedure and experi-
mental technique are presented in [31]. The temperature ranges
were 58–87 °C for 1, 48–78 °C for 2, and 65–111 °C for 3. The ther-
modynamic parameters of the sublimation process DHoT and DSTo
have been calculated from the temperature dependencies of satu-
rated vapour pressure.
formed on
a
Bruker-Nonius X8Apex (Mo Ka-radiation)
instrument [32]. Crystals of 1–3 (pale yellow needles) were grown
from the hexanes solution at À10 °C. The structure was determined
using the SHELXTL program and refined using full-matrix least-
squares. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically,
whereas hydrogen atoms were placed at the calculated positions
and included in the final stage of refinements with fixed parame-
ters. Crystallographic refinement parameters of complexes 1–3
are summarized in Table 1. The atomic coordinates and selective
bond distances and angles of these complexes are presented in
(Tables 4 and 5 Supplementary material).
2.4. Pulse MOCVD experiments
Mass spectra were obtained on a MI-1201 spectrometer; the en-
ergy of ionizing electrons was 35 eV. The vapour temperature of
the complexes was 70 °C (1), 60 °C (2), and 90 °C (3).
The thermal decomposition process of the vapour of com-
pounds 1 and 2 on a heated surface was studied by means of high
temperature mass spectrometry. The precursors were transferred
to the gas phase at a temperature of 100 °C for 1, and 80 °C for 2.
Detailed descriptions of the method and set-up can be found in
[27].
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out using a
JSM-6700F. The morphology of gold nanoparticles samples depos-
ited by pulse MOCVD technique was examined by a Solver Pro (NT-
MDT) atomic force microscope (AFM).
A horizontal hot wall pulse MOCVD system was used for depo-
sitions on silicon substrates. The apparatus for depositions is
drawn schematically in Fig. 1. MOCVD depositions of gold nano-
particles were performed under O2 flow from the precursor 2.
Silicon (100) discs 0.5 mm thick and 40 mm in diameter were used
as substrates. The substrate temperature was controlled in the
190–200 °C range. The base pressure of the reactor was maintained
below 10À2 Torr.
Deposition of gold particles was carried out in the following
cycle manner: (1) The reactor was vacuumed to residue pressure
of 10À2 Torr. (2) The vacuum valve was closed, then the valve on
the line, connecting the vapourizer with the reactor, was opened
and a portion of precursor vapour was injected into the system un-
der the force of saturated vapour pressure. The time of injection
was 5 s. (3) The oxygen valve was opened until the pressure in
the reactor became ꢀ7 Torr. (4) After introduction of oxygen, the
system was kept up for 15 s. Then the vacuum valve was opened
and a new deposition cycle was started.
2.2. Synthesis of complexes
[Me2AuI]2 and NaHCO3 were added to a methanol solution of
the equimolar amount of HSal@N–R. The mixture was stirred in ar-
gon flow at room temperature for 7 h. The methanol was removed
in vacuo and the residue was redissolved in hexane. The hexanes
solution was filtered and the volatile components were removed
in vacuo. The substance was purified by recrystallization from hex-
ane at À10 °C and the pale yellow crystals were formed.
The yield of complex 1 was 84%, m.p. 101–103 °C (lit. data
103 °C [28]). Spectral data for 1: IR (m, cmÀ1) (C–H)(Au–CH3)
2977 m, 2915 m; (C@N) 1633 vs; (C–O) 1188 m, 1152 m, 1124
m. 1H NMR d 1.02 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 1.23 (s, 3H, Au–CH3), d 3.63
(s, 3H, N–CH3), d 6.56–7.40 (4H, ArH), d 8.19 (s, 1H, N@C–H). Anal.
Calc. for C10H14AuNO: C, 33.2; H, 3.9; N, 3.9. Found: C, 33.4; H, 4.0;
N, 3.8%.
For deposition of gold nanoparticles, 20 cycles were carried out.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis
In paper [28], compounds 1 and 3 were earlier synthesized from
thallium salts of salicylaldimines and [Me2AuI]2 with 62% and 52%
yields accordingly. We offered a modified procedure with N-alkyl-
salicylaldimine as ligand source. The synthetic method, including
reaction of [Me2AuI]2 with the corresponding HSal@N–R, gives