T. A. Moss / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 4254–4258
4255
O
O
DMG
DMG
DMG
O
RCM
R
R
NaH, DMF
90%
R
n-BuLi, THF
N
N
N
N
Het
45%
S
Cl
DMG = NHBoc, CONHMe, SO2NHEt
4
11
Scheme 1. Directed metallation/RCM strategy described by Snieckus.
Scheme 3. Tautomerisation of C-allyl substrates.
consistent with over-reduction. Alternatively, attempted metalla-
tion/allylation of the benzylic CH2N(Boc)allyl pyridine resulted
largely in alkylation on the allylic methylene. The desired product
was accessed eventually by reductive amination of 4-iodopyridine
6a with allylamine followed by N-Boc protection to give 6b, then a
magnesium-halogen exchange with iPrMgCl17 and quenching with
allyl bromide to give 6 (Scheme 4). As with other examples, the 4-
allyl moiety could be tautomerised to the styrene 7 by stirring with
NaH in DMF.
more, we aimed to synthesise RCM products containing handles for
further elaboration (e.g., halogens for Pd-catalysed cross-
couplings), which could potentially pose problems with the
competitive metal–halogen exchange pathway. With these factors
in mind, we began our studies into the synthesis of the RCM
precursors. Allyl amides and allyl sulfonamides were intially
chosen as the metallation directing groups, as these could easily
be accessed in near quantitative yields from the carboxylic acid
and sulfonyl chlorides, respectively. In the case of carboxylic acid
derivatives, formation of the acid chloride with oxalyl chloride
prior to treatment with allylamine proved to be cleaner and quick-
er than direct amide coupling methods. The C-allyl group could
then be inserted by ortho-metallation with n-BuLi, followed by
quenching with allyl bromide. In most cases, it was necessary to
perform a transmetallation with copper(I) bromide prior to the
addition of the electrophile in order to attenuate the high basicity
of the lithium species. The more sensitive pyridine substrates
turned out not to be stable to n-BuLi, however, metallation could
be readily performed using milder TMPMgClÁLiCl (TMP = 2,2,6,6-
tetramethylpiperidide).14 This had the added benefit that carbon–
halogen bond insertion did not occur with this base, allowing aryl
bromide substrates to be accessed. Once C-allylation had been
performed, the RCM reaction could be carried out directly, or the
amide could be N-protected under standard conditions in cases
where the free NH turned out to be detrimental to RCM (Scheme 2).
Pleasingly, this approach worked well for a range of heteroaryl
substrates, including pyridines, thiophenes, pyrroles and pyrazoles,
giving the azocine RCM precursors in good overall yields. Further-
more, by exploiting the relative acidity of the C-allyl group, several
substrates were successfully tautomerised into the styrenyl
compounds by treatment with NaH (for pyridines) or n-BuLi. This
approach is particularly useful as it allows both the azocine and
azepine RCM products to be accessed from a single starting
material and provides a useful alternative to the traditional
formylation/Wittig15 and iodination/Stille16 pathways to these
substrates (Scheme 3).
With the precursors in hand, we began our studies into the RCM
reaction. Table 1. Amido-pyridine 1 reacted sluggishly when trea-
ted with 5 mol% of Grubbs (II) catalyst in CH2Cl2, giving only traces
of the RCM product 17 after heating to reflux for 4 h. Further heat-
ing to 80 °C in toluene gave mostly the competitive cross-metath-
esis product rather than the RCM product. Pleasingly, protection of
the NH with either Boc or methyl did allow the RCM reaction to oc-
cur. N-Boc precursor 2 gave the azocine 17 in reasonable yield after
Boc group cleavage (TFA in CH2Cl2), although significant amounts
of the cross-metathesis product were still seen. The formation of
this unwanted side-product could be suppressed to a degree by
increasing the reaction dilution from 0.1 to 0.02 M (47% vs 60%
yield of 17), however further dilution was not attempted as it
would limit the practicality of the reaction. Interestingly, N-Me
precursor 3 reacted significantly more smoothly in the RCM reac-
tion than the N-Boc compound 2, giving methylated azocine 18
in an 81% yield, with only a small amount of the cross-metathesis
product observed in the reaction mixture. Tautomerised pyridine 4
reacted more quickly in the RCM reaction than the allyl compound
giving azepine 19 in a 63% yield after N-Boc cleavage. This is not
entirely surprising as seven-membered ring formation is generally
more favourable than eight-membered systems. When a methyl
group was introduced onto the C-allyl (compound 5), only cross-
metathesis via the N-allyl was observed, highlighting the sensitiv-
ity of these substrates to steric contraints. The absence of the
amide carbonyl in precursors 6 and 7 resulted in much smoother
RCM reactions, giving azocine 21 and azepine 22, respectively, in
excellent yields (93% and 85%). Gratifyingly, sulfonamides 8 and
9 not only reacted smoothly in the RCM reaction without the need
for N-protection, but they also tolerated a methylallyl moiety,
giving methylated azocine 24 in an excellent 89% yield. The reac-
tion was then extended to include five-membered heterocycles.
Amido-thiophenes 10 and 11 worked reasonably well in the
RCM, as did amido-furan 13. As with the pyridine examples, the
sulfonamide analogues reacted considerably more smoothly than
the amide series, with thiophene 12, pyrazole 14 and pyrrole 15
giving the sulfonamide azocines in high yields (70–84%).
Sulfonamido-azaindole 16 appeared to react somewhat slowly in
the RCM, requiring prolonged heating for 16 h to achieve a 25%
conversion into tricyclic azocine 31.
We also wanted to evaluate benzylic examples (i.e., with the
amide reduced), as such structures appear in several natural
products (e.g., galanthamine, apparacine, see Fig. 1). Unfortunately,
direct reduction of the amide did not prove to be a reliable reac-
tion. Heating pyridine 1 with LiAlH4 in THF was required to achieve
the initial reduction of the amide, with the second reduction of the
amino-alcohol intermediate being somewhat sluggish. Prolonged
heating or addition of further reductant appeared to give products
O
H
O
O
H
a
c
N
H
N
H
OH
Het
Het
Het
Het
Het
Het
I
I
O
O
O
O
O
O
CHO
Cl
S
H
a, b
S
S
H
c
N
Boc
b
c
N
H
N
H
Cl
N
Boc
N
N
Cl
6b
N
Cl
6
6a
Scheme 2. Initial route to heterocycle-fused azocines and azepines. Reagents and
conditions: (a) (COCl)2, CH2Cl2, DMF (cat.), then allylamine, Et3N; (b) allylamine,
Et3N, CH2Cl2; (c) n-BuLi, CuBr, allyl bromide, THF.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) allylamine, MeOH, rt, then NaBH4, 77%; (b)
Boc2O, MeOH, rt, 91%; (c) PrMgCl, THF, À30 °C–rt, then allyl bromide, 70%.
i