L. Busetto et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 690 (2005) 818–824
823
In a parallel experiment, the in situ generated
[Na][Rh{C5H4CO2(CH2)2NTs}(NBD)] (2) was analysed
by NMR spectroscopy as follows: after 3 h a portion of
the crude mixture was transferred with a cannula to a
NMR tube. The solvent was removed under vacuum
and after addition of [D5]Pyr the tube was flame sealed
[M]+ + Na@538 m/z. Anal. Calcd. for C23H26NO4RhS:
C, 53.6; H, 5.05; Found: C, 53.6; H, 5.04%. m.p. = 104
to 106 ꢁC. Rf(Et2O, SiO2) = 0.50.
3.2. X-ray crystallography
1
under argon. NMR data for 2: H NMR (1H, 399.9
Yellow crystals of 3 and 4 suitable for the X-ray dif-
fraction studies were precipitated from a double layer
CH2Cl2/Etp at ꢀ20 ꢁC. Crystal data and details of struc-
ture refinement are reported in Table 2.
3
MHz, [D5]Pyr): d = 8.09 (AA0BB0, JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 2H;
3
Ts), 7.18 (AA0BB0, JH,H = 8.4 Hz, 2H; Ts), 5.70 (m,
3
2H; Cp), 5.35 (m, 2H; Cp), 4.64 (t, JH,H = 5.9 Hz,
3
2H; CO2CH2), 3.49 (t, JH,H = 5.9 Hz, 2H; CH2N),
Diffraction intensities were collected on a Bruker
AXS SMART 2000 CCD diffractometer. The data were
collected using 0.3ꢁ wide x scans, crystal-to-detector
distance of 5.0 cm, and corrected for absorption using
the SADABS routine [8]. Data collections nominally cov-
ered a full sphere of reciprocal space for both com-
plexes with 10 s exposure time per frame. Both
structures were solved by direct methods and refined
on F2 by full-matrix least-squares calculations using
the SHELXTL/PC package [9]. The structure of 3 was
found affected by disorder at the CH2NHTs moiety,
which could be refined using the Ts fragment taken
from molecule 4 as a starting model for the two slightly
displaced images. An occupation factor of ca. 0.5 was
refined. Two independent isomeric molecules were
found packed in an orderly way in the crystals of 4.
Thermal vibrations were treated anisotropically in 3,
except for the disordered moiety, while could be treated
only isotropically in 4, except for Rh and S atoms, due
to the high correlation between parameters and conse-
quent instability of the least squares calculations. The
absolute configuration was assigned to the molecules
in the crystal of 4, as reported in Fig. 2, by using the
Flack parameter (ꢀ0.0005 for the correct absolute
structure) [10]. H atoms were experimentally located
3.36 (m, 4H; H2,3,5,6, NBD), 3.18 (m, 2H; H1,4, NBD),
3
2.19 (s, 3H; Me), 0.85 (t, JH,H = 1.7 Hz, 2H; H7,
NBD); 13C{1H} NMR (100.6 MHz, [D5]Pyr):
d = 166.2 (C@O), 141.1 (ipso-C, Ts), 129.4, 127.4 (Ts),
88.9 (d, JC,Rh = 5.0 Hz; ipso-C, Cp), 88.7 (d, JC,Rh = 4.5
Hz; CH, Cp), 86.7 (d, JC,Rh = 4.2 Hz; CH, Cp), 65.4
(CO2C2), 57.5 (d, JC,Rh = 6.9 Hz; C7, NBD), 47.0 (d,
JC,Rh = 2.9 Hz; C1,4, NBD), 44.9 (CH2NHTs), 32.6 (d,
JC,Rh = 10.5 Hz; C2,3,5,6, NBD), 21.1 (CH3).
3.1.4. Preparation of [Rh{g5-
C5H4CO2(CH2)2N(Me)Ts}(NBD)] (4)
To a solution of 1 (0.37 g, 1.1 mmol) in THF (25 mL),
solid [Rh(NBD)Cl]2 (0.20 g, 0.43 mmol) was added.
After stirring 3 h at room temperature 0.2 mL of freshly
distilled MeI was slowly added with a syringe. After 4 h,
the solvent was removed under vacuum and CH2Cl2 was
added. The suspension was first filtered on a celite pad
and then chromatographed on silica gel using Et2O/
Etp (1:1) as the eluting solvent. A yellow fraction was
collected and identified as the title compound (0.34 g,
77%). 1H NMR (399.9 MHz, CDCl3): d = 7.68
3
(AA0BB0, JH,H = 8.1 Hz, 2H; Ts), 7.30 (AA0BB0,
3JH,H = 8.1 Hz, 2H; Ts), 5.46 (m, 2H; Cp), 5.34 (m,
3
2H; Cp), 4.35 (t, JH,H = 5.6 Hz, 2H; CO2CH2), 3.35
˚
but geometrically positioned [C–H 0.93 and 0.97 A
3
(t, JH,H = 5.6 Hz, 2H; CH2N), 3.32 (m, 4H; H2,3,5,6
,
NBD), 3.30 (m, 2H; H1,4, NBD), 2.88 (s, 3H; NCH3),
for aromatic and aliphatic distances] and refined ‘‘rid-
ing’’ on their corresponding carbon atoms. The N–H
distance in 3 was constrained to an average value of
3
2.41 (s, 3H; CH3), 0.99 (t, JH,H = 1.4 Hz, 2H; H7,
NBD); 13C{1H} NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): d = 165.7
(C@O), 143.4 (ipso-C, Ts), 134.7 (ipso-C, Ts), 129.7
(CH, Ts), 127.3 (CH, Ts), 91.5 (d, JC,Rh = 4.0 Hz;
ipso-C, Cp), 88.4 (d, JC,Rh = 4.0 Hz; CH, Cp), 86.0 (d,
JC,Rh = 4.0 Hz; Cp), 61.9 (CO2C2), 57.5 (d, JC,Rh = 6.5
Hz; C7, NBD), 49.1 (CH2N), 46.7 (d, JC,Rh = 2.4 Hz;
0.89(1) A in the two images. Refinement converged at
˚
a final R = 0.033 for 3 and R = 0.056 for 4. Molecular
graphics were prepared using ORTEP3 for Win-
dowsNT [11].
CCDC-242972 (3) and CCDC-242973 (4) contain the
supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
These data can be obtained free of charge on application
to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK
[Fax: (internat.) +44-1223-336-033; E-mail: deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
C
C
1,4, NBD), 36.0 (NCH3), 32.6 (d, JC,Rh = 10.5 Hz;
2,3,5,6, NBD), 21.5 (CH3). 1H NMR (399.9 MHz,
3
[D8]Toluene): d = 7.55 (AA0BB0, JH,H = 8.2 Hz, 2H;
3
Ts), 6.79 (AA0BB0, JH,H = 8.2 Hz, 2H; Ts), 5.53
3
(AA0BB0, JH,H = 2.2 Hz, 2H; Cp), 5.05 (AA0BB0X,
3JH,H = 2.2 Hz, JH,Rh = 0.8 Hz, 2H; Cp), 4.15 (t,
3JH,H = 5.6 Hz, 2H; CO2CH2), 3.29 (m, 4H; H2,3,5,6
,
NBD), 3.18 (m, 2H; H1,4, NBD), 3.05 (t, JH,H = 5.6
Hz, 2H; CH2N), 2.56 (s, 3H; NCH3), 1.94 (s, 3H;
Acknowledgements
3
The authors thank the University of Bologna and the
`
Ministero della Industria, Universita e Ricerca (MIUR),
Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Notevole Interesse
3
CH3), 0.89 (t, JH,H = 1.6 Hz, 2H; H7, NBD). IR
(THF, cmꢀ1): m = 1712 (s) (C@O). ESI-MS