tem including TiCl4 and t-BuNH2 has been recently used
for a transformation which involves an intermolecular
hydroamination and a Lewis acid catalyzed reaction.6
The interest of the pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole skeleton is con-
nected to its structural relationship with mitomycins,7 an
important class of antibiotics characterized by noteworthy
antitumoral activity. Several approaches for the synthesis and
functionalization of this system have been explored.8 Re-
cently, some interesting syntheses were reported, starting
from simple N-allyl-indole-2-carbaldehydes via inter-/intra-
molecular 1,3-dipolar-9 or hetero Diels-Alder-type10 cyclo-
additions and via Ru-catalyzed RCM reactions.11 Moreover,
intramolecular Pauson-Khand reaction of N-allyl-2-ethy-
nilindole promoted by molecular sieves gave the correspond-
ing condensed pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole.12 Finally, pyrrolo[1,2-
a]indole-2,3-dicarboxylate was easily obtained by a one-pot
reaction among indol-2-carbaldehyde, triphenylphosphine,
and acetylene dicarboxylate.13
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Starting Materials
Otherwise, our approach is characterized by some out-
standing features: (1) the use of easily accessible building
blocks, (2) the cheapness of reagents involved, and (3) the
capability to obtain in a single step several pyrrolo[1,2-a]-
indole scaffolds differently substituted on C-1 and bearing
an aldehydic function on C-2 susceptible to further trans-
formations.
Starting materials were prepared using both traditional and
catalytic strategies. The 2-acetylindole14 1a and the 2-ben-
zoylindole15 1b were prepared in good yields by standard
methods. 2-Acylindoles 1c-g were prepared starting from
the indole-2-carboxylic acid chloride, easily obtained in
almost quantitative yield by reaction of the corresponding
acid with oxalyl chloride. Thus, 2-aroylindoles 1c,d and
2-heteroaroylindole 1e were synthesized in good yield
through a Suzuki-type coupling reaction in anhydrous toluene
at 50-60 °C using a ratio of acid chloride/boronic acid/
K2CO3/Pd(OAc)2/P(o-tolyl)3 equal to 1:1.2:3:0.05:0.07
(Scheme 1). Unfortunately, this strategy failed in the
synthesis of derivatives 1f and 1g; this is probably due to
the low nucleophilicity of C-2 with respect to C-3 in the
furan- and thiophen-boronic acids.16 Otherwise, compounds
1f and 1g were prepared in moderate to good yield via a
Negishi-type coupling; the suitable furane- and thiophene-
2-zinc-halide17 were prepared in situ and reacted with indole-
2-carboxylic acid chloride in anhydrous THF at 50 °C in
the presence of 0.04 equiv of Pd(PPh3)4 (Scheme 1).
Afterward, 2-carbonyl-indoles 1a-g were converted into the
corresponding N-propargyl derivatives 2a-g in good to
excellent yield by means of PTC nucleophilic substitution
in toluene/50% aqueous NaOH and tetrabutylammonium
bromide (TBAB) as the catalyst18 (Scheme 1).
Before reacting the whole series of N-propargyl-2-carbo-
nylindoles 2a-g, we investigated the optimal reaction
conditions to obtain pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehydes 3,
taking 2b as the model compound and modifying consecu-
tively the solvent, the metal salt, the temperature, the energy
source, and the ratio among reaction partners (Table 1). Two
considerations prompted us to engage this screening: (1) the
initial reaction conditions, besides a moderate yield of 3H-
pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehydes 3b, gave a significant
amount of unreacted starting product 2b (entry 1) and (2)
the study of the optimal reaction conditions could help us to
understand the reaction mechanism involved in this original
domino cyclization.
Any modification of the combination TiCl4/t-BuNH2/
toluene gave worse results. A different titanium salt as well
as the use of polar protic and aprotic solvents gave a complex
mixture of unidentified products (entries 2-4). Although a
huge number of articles and reviews19 testify that micro-
waves20 can speed up reactions and improve the yields, our
reaction did not seem to be positively influenced by the use
of this nonconventional energy source (entries 5-7); in
(6) Ackermann, L.; Born, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 9541.
(7) Hata, T.; Sano, Y.; Sugawara, A.; Matsune, A.; Kanamori, K.; Shima,
T.; Hoshi, T. J. Antiobiot., Ser. A 1956, 9, 141 (mitomycins A and B).
Wakaki, S.; Marumo, H.; Tomioka, K.; Shimizu, G.; Kato, E.; Kamada,
H.; Kudo, S.; Fujimoto, Y. Antiobiot. Chemother. 1958, 8, 288 (mitomycin
C).
(8) Takahashi, K.; Kametani, T. Heterocycles 1979, 13, 411.
(9) (a) Prajapati, D.; Gadhwal, S. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4909. (b)
Beccalli, E. M.; Broggini, G.; La Rosa, C.; Passarella, D.; Pilati, T.;
Terraneo, A.; Zecchi, G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8924.
(10) Borah, H. N.; Deb, M. L.; Boruah, R. C.; Bhuyan, P. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 3391.
(11) Gonza´lez-Pe´rez, P.; Pe´rez-Serrano, L.; Casarrubios, L.; Dom´ınguez,
G.; Pe´rez-Castells, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4765.
(12) Pe´rez-Serrano, L.; Dom´ınguez, G.; Pe´rez-Castells, J. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 5413.
(13) Yavari, I.; Adib, M.; Sayahi, M. H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2002, 1517.
(14) Bennasar, M.-L.; Vidal, B.; Bosch, J. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3597.
(15) Sundberg, R. J.; Russel, H. F.; Ligon, W. V., Jr.; Lin, L.-S J. Org.
Chem. 1972, 37, 719.
(16) Rossi, E.; Abbiati, G.; Canevari, V.; Celentano, G.; Magri, E.
Synthesis 2006, 299.
(17) Johnson, A. T.; Klein, E. S.; Wang, L.; Pino, M. E.; Chandraratna,
R. A. S. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 5027.
(18) Broggini, G.; Bruche´, L.; Zecchi, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1990, 533.
(19) (a) Nu¨chter, M.; Ondruschka, B.; Bonrath, W.; Gum, A. Green
Chem. 2004, 6, 128. (b) Nu¨chter, M.; Mu¨ller, U.; Ondruschka, B.;
Lautenschla¨ger, W. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2003, 26, 1208. (c) Larhed, M.;
Moberg, C.; Hallberg, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 717. (d) Lidstro¨m, P.;
Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225.
(20) AA.VV. MicrowaVes In Organic Synthesis; Loupy, A., Ed.; Wiley
VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, 2002.
4840
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 21, 2006