(MeOH/EtOAc, 2:10) to give a colorless oil: yield 0.43 g, 58%
(95% pure by area % HPLC analysis); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 0.91 (3H, t, J ) 7.5 Hz), 1.48-1.53 (2H, m), 2.46-2.80 (8H,
m), 4.63 (1H, dd,1H, JâH-RH′ ) 10.5 Hz and JâH-RH′′ ) 3.6 Hz),
7.03 (1H, dd, 1H, J ) 8.2 Hz, J ) 2.1 Hz), 7.26-7.38 (3H, m),
7.71 (1H, td, J ) 7.8 Hz, J ) 1.7 Hz), 8.52 (1H, dd, J ) 4.75 Hz,
J ) 1.5 Hz), 8.56 (1H, d, J ) 2.2 Hz); Rf (MF: MeOH/EtOAc,
2:10) ) 0.46; FT-IR (NaCl) 3321, 2963, 2958, 1472, 1425, 1397,
1131, 1030, 819, 715 cm-1; EI MS m/z 353 [MH+], FAB MS m/z
353 [MH+]; HRMS m/z calcd for C18H23Cl2N2O [MH+] 353.1187,
found 353.1186.
in CD3OD. Sample concentrations were 25 mM and 10 mM. 2D
spectra were measured at 25 and 0 °C. The proton chemical shifts
were assigned following a standard procedures using homonuclear
DQF-COSY,8 TOCSY,9,10 and NOESY11 experiments in combina-
1
tion with an H-13C HSQC12 experiment. Carbons were assigned
using the 1H-13C HSQC spectrum. Typically, the 2D proton spectra
were acquired in the phase sensitive mode with 4096 data points
in the t2 dimension, 4-32 scans, 256-512 complex points in the
t1 dimension, and a relaxation delay of 1-2 s. The 1H sweep width
was 6600 Hz. NOESY and ROESY13 spectra were measured with
150 and 300 ms mixing times. The 1H-13C HMQC spectrum was
acquired as a matrix of 512 × 128 complex points with 4 scans
and a relaxation delay of 1 s. The 13C sweep width was 25000 Hz.
Data were processed and analyzed using a FELIX software package
from Accelrys. Spectra were zero-filled two times and apodized
with a squared sine bell function shifted by π/2 in both dimensions.
A linear prediction of the data was applied in the carbon dimension.
The chemical shift differences of the two exchange sites were
determined by line shape simulation performed using GRAMS/32
AI software from Thermo Galactic. For accurate determination of
the frequencies at coalescence the second derivatives were used.
Band components with known frequencies were adjusted using a
band fitting algorithm to minimize the difference between the
experimental and calculated band shape. A mixture of Lorentzian
and Gaussian band shape was used throughout. The only restriction
in the band fitting algorithm was the relative intensity of the band
component, which was assumed to obey the expected theoretical
values.
2-{[2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethyl]propylamino}-1-pyridin-3-
ylethanol Dihydrobromide (5). The solution of tertiary amine 4
(0.4 g, 1.1 mmol) in acetone (3.5 mL) was cooled on ice bath. A
0.97 mL (0.22 g HBr, 2.8 mmol) solution of HBr in EtOH was
added dropwise. After the precipitate appeared, approximate 2.5
mL of diethyl ether was added. The reaction mixture was stirred
on an ice bath for 2 h. The white precipitate was filtered and
successively washed with diethyl ether: yield 0.46 g, 79% (99%
pure by area % HPLC analysis); mp 130-132 °C; Rf (MF: MeOH/
1
EtOAc, 10:2) ) 0.6; H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, 50 °C) δ
0.94 (3H, t, J ) 7.1 Hz), 1.80 (2H, m), 3.10-3.70 (8H, m), 5.54
(1H, m), 7.39 (1H, br), 7.59 (1H, d, J ) 8.2 Hz), 7.70 (1H, br),
8.11 (1H, dd, J ) 8.1 Hz, J ) 5.6 Hz), 8.72 (1H, dt, J ) 8.2 Hz,
J ) 1.7 Hz), 8.93 (1H, dd, J ) 5.7 Hz, J ) 1.4 Hz), 9.09 (1H, d,
J ) 1.8 Hz); FT-IR (KBr) 3411, 3168, 2953, 2684, 1626, 1536,
1472, 1347, 1210, 1128, 1028, 805, 680 cm-1; EI MS m/z 353
[MH+], FAB MS m/z 353 [MH+]; HRMS m/z calcd for C18H22-
Cl2N2O [MH+] 353.1187, found 353.1188. Anal. Calcd for C18H24-
Br2Cl2N2O‚4/5H2O: C, 40.83; H, 4.87; N, 5.29. Found: C, 40.86;
H, 4.74; N, 5.21.
MO Calculations. Conformational analysis was performed using
a Spartan software package running on a Silicon Graphics computer.
All rotatable bonds were systematically varied and conformational
energies calculated at the AM1 level. Relevant minima were also
calculated at the ab initio HF level using a 3-21g* and 6-31g* basis
set. The calculations with the 6-31g* basis set were performed using
Gaussian 98 software.
Route B (Scheme 2). 2-[2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethylamino]-
1-pyridin-3-ylethanol (6). NaBH4 (2.0 g, 52.8 mmol) was added
to a solution of compd 1 (4.0 g, 14.4 mmol) in anhyd EtOH (60
mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 2 h. The mixture
was filtered, and 3,4-dichlorophenethylamine (3.9 mL, 26.0 mmol)
was added to the filtrate liquid. The solution was heated to reflux
and refluxed overnight. The EtOH was removed by distillation. The
resulting pale yellow solid was dissolved in CHCl3 (60 mL), the
insoluble part was filtered off, and the filtrate concentrated by
distillation under reduced pressure. The product was chromato-
graphed on silica (MeOH/EtOAc, 10:2 to gradient elution MeOH/
EtOAc, 1:1) to give a yellow oil: yield 3.18 g, 71%; (96% pure
by area % HPLC analysis); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.66-
3.01 (6H, m), 4.71 (1H, dd, JâH-RH′ ) 9.2 Hz, JâH-RH′′ ) 3.6 Hz),
7.03 (1H, dd, J ) 8.2 Hz, J ) 2.0 Hz), 7.26-7.38 (3H, m), 7.70
(1H, td, J ) 7.8 Hz, J ) 1.8 Hz), 8.51 (1H, dd, J ) 4.7 Hz, J )
1.7 Hz), 8.56 (1H, d, J ) 2.15 Hz); Rf (MF: MeOH/EtOAc, 10:2)
) 0.3; FT-IR (NaCl) 3411, 2934, 2835, 1602, 1561, 1472, 1413,
1130, 1031, 818 cm-1; EI MS m/z 311 [MH+], FAB MS m/z 311
[MH+]; HRMS m/z calcd for C15H17Cl2N2O [MH+] 311.0718, found
311.0725.
2-{[2-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)ethyl]propylamino}-1-pyridin-3-
ylethanol Dihydrobromide (5). Secondary amine 6 (0.5 g, 1.6
mmol) and CH3CH2CHO (0.2 mL, 2.4 mmol) were dissolved in
1,2-dichloroethane (10 mL) and then treated with NaBH(OAc)3
(0.53 g, 2.5 mmol). The mixture was stirred at rt under an Ar
atmosphere for 2 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by adding
aq saturated NaHCO3 (20 mL) solution, and the product was
extracted with EtOAc (20 mL). The EtOAc extract was dried
(NaSO4), and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure
to give the crude free base 4, which was chromatographed on silica
(MeOH/EtOAc, 10:2) to give a yellow oil: yield 0.47 g, 83% (97%
pure by area % HPLC analysis). The product was converted to the
dihydrobromide salt 5 (the procedure described under method A
was followed).
Acknowledgment. We thank Silva Zagorc and Sandi
Borisˇek for technical assistance. This work was supported by
Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d., the Ministry of Higher Education,
Science, and Technology of Slovenia, and the European
Community (STEROLTALK project contract No. LSHG-CT-
2005-512096).
1
Supporting Information Available: (1) Table of the H and
13C chemical shift assignments for 5 in CD3OD, (2) proton spectrum
of 5 in CD3OD, (3) expanded region of the NOESY spectra of 5 in
CD3OD showing the exchange cross-peaks, (4) temperature de-
pendence of selected 1H NMR signals of 5 in CD3OD, (5)
1
dependence of selected H NMR signals of 4 upon titration with
benzenesulfonic acid, (6) expanded regions of the NOESY spectra
of 5 measured at 25 and 0 °C in CD3OD, (7) expanded region of
the ROESY spectra of 5 measured at 0 °C in CD3OD, and (8)
compact Gaussian 98 output of structures presented in Figure 2.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
JO051455F
(8) Rance, M.; Sorensen, O. W.; Bodenhausen, G.; Wagner, G.; Ernst,
R. R.; Wuethrich K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1983, 117, 479-
485.
(9) Braunschweiler, L.; Ernst, R. R. J. Magn. Reson. 1983, 53, 521-
528.
(10) Bax, A.; Davis, D. G. J. Magn. Reson. 1985, 65, 355-360.
(11) Jeener, J.; Meier, B. H.; Bachmann, P.; Ernst, R. R. J. Chem. Phys.
1979, 71, 4546-4553.
(12) Willker, W.; Leibfritz, D.; Kerssebaum, R.; Bermel, W. Magn.
Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 287-292.
NMR Studies of Conformation and Stereodynamics. NMR
spectra of 4 and 5 were recorded on a 600 MHz NMR spectrometer
(13) Griesinger, C.; Ernst, R. R. J. Magn. Reson. 1987, 75, 261-271.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2006 795