C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
K ions to Cu and Ti species so that the electron transfer from Cu(I)
is less favorable.7
Clarification of the reaction mechanism is important for the future
design of catalysts with enhanced performance. That the reaction
occurs stoichiometrically without added oxygen supports the so-
called classic dehydrogenation mechanism where the alcohol
dehydrogenation and oxidant reduction steps are sequential, and
not coupled (SI).2 The lower yield in the absence of O2 and
formation of the surface hydride species as determined by EPR
and spin trapping are both consistent with this mechanism (SI).8
In addition, benzaldehyde is readily oxidized by a free radical
mechanism to benzoic acid, so that the very high benzaldehyde
yield argues against a free radical mechanism dominating the
chemistry here. For the catalyst performed with added O2, no surface
hydride species are observed, suggesting that O2 acts as an efficient
hydrogen acceptor and accelerates the reaction by creating the free
active Cu(I) sites.
In summary, using a high surface area catalyst and the homo-
geneous distribution of multiple components integrated into a
matrix, we have shown that the gas-phase oxidation of benzyl
alcohol to benzaldehyde can be accomplished at low temperatures,
with a high TOF (up to 108 h-1). We believe that this strategy will
be of general importance to other multicomponent heterogeneous
catalytic reactions and has promise as an alternative to current
alcohol oxidation processes.3
Figure 2. XPS spectra of mesoporous (a) 3K-Cu-20TiO2 and (b) Cu-20TiO2
before and after the reaction; (c) benzaldehyde selectivity and benzyl alcohol
conversion as a function of the setup temperature (Text) over 3K-Cu-20TiO2;
and (d) benzaldehyde yields vs time on stream using Cu-TiO2 (200 °C),
3K-Cu-20TiO2 (210 °C), and 3K-Cu-50TiO2 (210 °C) as the catalysts.
The incorporation of 0.2% Cu (Ti/Cu ) 500) can significantly boost
the benzyl alcohol-to-benzaldehyde conversion of TiO2, from 6.9
to 46.1%. For comparison, mesoporous Cu-ZrO2, Cu-SiO2, and Cu-
Al2O3 were also synthesized and investigated as catalysts for gas-
phase benzyl alcohol oxidation. They all show very poor activity
(1%-7% conversion), implying that there is a synergistic effect
between Cu and TiO2.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful for financial support from
the National Science Foundations of China (20873122 and J0830413)
and the National Science Foundation (DMR 02-33728). We thank
Dr. Peter Ford for helpful discussions.
One of the biggest challenges in selective oxidation is the
deactivation of catalysts during the course of a long-term reaction.
Continually exposing copper catalysts to oxidizing and reducing
environments generally leads to a change of their oxidation state
and a concurrent major modification of their catalytic properties.
In our reaction system, two factors play very important roles in
the stabilization of the Cu(I) oxidation state in mesoporous Cu-K-
TiO2 catalysts and their stable, excellent catalytic performance: (i)
a low reaction temperature (203-223 °C). TPO studies reveal that
the Cu(I)-to-Cu(II) conversion in mesoporous 3K-Cu-20TiO2 starts
Supporting Information Available: The synthesis of mesoporous
materials, material characterization, and catalytic result analysis. This
References
(1) (a) Kroschwitz, J. I. Kirk Othmer Encyclopeida of Chemical Technology,
4th ed.; Wiley-Interscience Publications: New York, 1992; Vol. 4. (b) Centi,
G.; Cavani, F.; Trifiro, F. SelectiVe Oxidation by Heterogeneous Catalysis;
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, 2001.
(2) (a) Mallat, T.; Baiker, A. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 3037–3058. (b) Sheldon,
R. A.; Arends, I.; Ten Brink, G. J.; Dijksman, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35,
774–781.
at 222 °C. At a high reaction temperature (Text ) 230 °C, Tbed
)
247 °C), complete Cu(I)-to-Cu(II) conversion leads to total oxida-
tion of benzyl alcohol; (ii) homogeneous distribution of the K
component in the proximity of Cu(I) integrated into the 3-D TiO2
host matrix. Making a mechanical mixture of KCl with Cu-TiO2
gives poor catalytic performance. After a 20-h reaction, more than
90% Cu(I) in Cu-20TiO2 is oxidized into Cu(II), together with an
∼50% loss in benzaldehyde yield (Figure 2b,d). In contrast, after
adding the K component, the Cu(I) % does not change (44% vs
45%) and the benzaldehyde yield only slightly decreases from
71.9% to 67.6%. The improved stability of Cu(I) of K-Cu-TiO2
against oxidation is also confirmed by the increased Cu(I)-to-Cu(II)
conversion temperature (from 190 to 222 °C). After the homoge-
neous incorporation of the K species, the bonding energy of Ti2p3/2
and Cu2p3/2 of 3K-Cu-50TiO2 shifts down 0.6 and 0.4 eV due to
increased electron density, which may be responsible for the
improved stability of Cu(I) against oxidation. Homogeneous
distribution of the K atoms is necessary to ensure the proximity of
(3) (a) Mori, K.; Hara, T.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 10657–10666. (b) Abad, A.; Concepcion, P.; Corma, A.;
Garcia, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4066–4069. (c) Choudhary,
V. R.; Dhar, A.; Jana, P.; Jha, R.; Uphade, B. S. Green Chem. 2005, 7,
768–770. (d) Son, Y. C.; Makwana, V. D.; Howell, A. R.; Suib, S. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4280–4283. (e) Enache, D. I.; Edwards, J. K.;
Landon, P.; Solsona-Espriu, B.; Carley, A. F.; Herzing, A. A.; Watanabe,
M.; Kiely, C. J.; Knight, D. W.; Hutchings, G. J. Science 2006, 311, 362–
365. (f) Wang, L. C.; He, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Y. M.; Chen, M.; Cao, Y.; He,
H. Y.; Fan, K. N. Appl. Catal., A 2008, 344, 150–157.
(4) (a) Biella, S.; Rossi, M. Chem. Commun. 2003, 378–379. (b) Yamamoto,
R.; Sawayama, Y.; Shibahara, H.; Ichihashi, Y.; Nishiyama, S.; Tsuruya, S.
J. Catal. 2005, 234, 308–317. (c) Hayashibara, H.; Nishiyama, S.; Tsuruya,
S.; Masai, M. J. Catal. 1995, 153, 254–264. (d) Pina, C. D.; Falleta, E.;
Rossi, M. J. Catal. 2008, 260, 384–396.
(5) Fan, J.; Boettcher, S. W.; Stucky, G. D. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 6391–
6396.
(6) Goodby, B. E.; Pemberton, J. E. Appl. Spectrosc. 1988, 42, 754–760.
(7) Jones, R. D.; Summerville, D. A.; Basolo, F. Chem. ReV. 1979, 79, 139–
179.
(8) Conte, M.; Miyamura, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Chechik, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 7189–7196.
JA9032499
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 43, 2009 15569