ORGANIC
LETTERS
2002
Vol. 4, No. 23
4147-4149
Tandem Copper-Catalyzed
Enantioselective Allylation−Metathesis
Alexandre Alexakis* and Karine Croset
Department of Organic Chemistry, UniVersity of GeneVa, 30, Quai Ernest Ansermet,
1211 GeneVa 4, Switzerland
Received September 18, 2002
ABSTRACT
Grignard reagents undergo enantioselective (up to 86% ee) copper-catalyzed SN2′ substitution on achiral allylic chlorides. The reaction is wide
in scope for both the Grignard reagent and the allylic substrate. The resulting terminal alkene could be submitted to intra- or intermolecular
metathesis to afford new chiral synthons. The experimental conditions are compatible with a one-pot overall substitution−metathesis procedure
without loss of enantioselectivity.
The allylic substitution reaction is a useful organic trans-
formation, provided the regio-, stereo-, and chemoselectivities
could be controlled. This control is usually provided by the
type of metal catalyst, by the nucleophile, and by the leaving
group.1 In the field of asymmetric synthesis, although
spectacular results have been achieved with Pd,2 only recent
attention has been paid to Cu, despite the fact that it allows
the best γ-regioselectivity.3 In addition, Cu allows the use
of Grignard or organozinc reagents as nucleophiles.
chiral source, whereas all other authors have used an external
chiral ligand (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Enantioselective copper-catalyzed γ-allylations have been
disclosed, with R2Zn, by Knochel,4 Hoveyda,5 and Feringa,6
and with RMgX, by us7 and by Van Koten and Ba¨ckvall.8
The latter authors have worked with a chiral Cu thiolate, as
In our first report,7 we showed that Grignard reagents can
afford high enantioselectivity only with aryl-substituted
(cinnamyl-type) allylic chlorides. CuCN was essential for
the control of the γ-regioselectivity, and the best ligand was
4 (Figure 1). Since that report, we have disclosed new chiral
ligands, 5-7, with induced atropoisomerism,9 and we have
(1) Magid, R. M. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 1901.
(2) Trost, B. M.; van Vranken D. L. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 395.
(3) Karlstro¨m, A. S. E.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E. In Modern Organocopper
Chemistry; Krause, N., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; p 259.
(4) (a) Du¨bner, F.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 379.
(b) Du¨bner, F.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9233.
(5) Luchaco-Cullis, C. A.; Mizutani, H.; Murphy, K. E.; Hoveyda, A.
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1456.
(8) (a) van Klaveren, M.; Personn, E. S. M.; del Villar, A.; Grove, D.
M.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E.; van Koten, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3059. (b)
Karltro¨m, A. S. E.; Huerta, F. F.; Meuzelaar, G. J.; Ba¨ckvall, J.-E Synlett
2001, 923.
(6) Malda, H.; van Zijl, A. W.; Arnold, L. A.; Feringa, B. L. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1169.
(7) Alexakis, A.; Malan, C.; Lea, L.; Benhaim, C.; Fournioux, X. Synlett
2001, 927.
(9) Alexakis, A.; Rosset, S.; Allamand, J.; March, S.; Guillen, F.;
Benhaim, C. Synlett 2001, 1375.
10.1021/ol0269244 CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/16/2002