1100
TOMILOV
Table 1. Effect of cathode material on reduction of butyl
iodide in methanol
that reduction is partially due to chemical dissolution
of zinc. Data in Table 1 refer to a smooth copper
cathode. For comparison, we performed an experiment
under the same conditions with a cathode coated with
spongy copper. On such an activated electrode no
hydrogen evolution was observed in the first 1.5 h of
the electrolysis, i.e., reduction occured at a high rate;
however, the yield of octane based on butyl iodide
was essentially the same, 80.1%. Further experiments
showed that variation of the current density in the
range 0.03 0.10 A cm 2 has no appreciable effect on
the reduction, whereas, as the sodium methylate con-
centration is increased from 0.005 to 0.7 M, the proc-
ess parameters become worse (despite somewhat
lower working voltage on the electrolyzer), which is
illustrated in Table 2. The yield of octane increases as
the temperature is decreased to 0 C. In the experiment
performed at 0 1 C, the yield of octane based on
butyl iodide was 83 84%.
a
Yield as a function of current,
%
Yield of
octane based
on butyl
Cathode
material
H2
C4H10
C8H18
iodide, %
Pb
Zn
Hg
Sn
Graphite
Cu
St.3 steel
Ni
28
27
4
29
31
21
34
50
29.6
72.2
36.0
30.1
34.0
25.7
19.6
24.7
14.8
17.3
45.6
37.5
18.8
47.8
56.0
79.6
78.0
60.0
a
Catholyte 0.005 M CH ONa in methanol (270 ml), 50 g of
3
butyl iodide; current density 0.028 A cm ; temperature 20
2
2
5 C.
Thus, dimerization of butyl iodide by cathodic
dehalogenation can be performed with a good yield.
The copper cathode shows a high electrocatalytic
activity; the dimeric product can also be obtained with
an iron cathode.
Table 2. Effect of sodium methylate concentration on
reduction of butyl iodide
a
Obtained, g
Yield of octane
based on butyl
iodide, %
[
CH ONa],
3
M
EXPERIMENTAL
C4H10
C8H18
0
.005
2.3
4.15
7.9
5.9
5.1
9.2
7.7
6.0
5.7
5.1
78.0
64.5
42.6
49.1
48.9
Chemically pure grade butyl iodide was distilled
prior to use; the fraction with bp 101 102 C was
collected. Chemically pure grade methanol was used
as solvent without additional purification. Solution of
sodium methylate was prepared by dissolution of the
calculated amount of metallic sodium in methanol.
0
0
0
0
.05
.20
.35
.70
a
The other conditions are the same as for Table 1.
Experiments were performed in a cylindrical glass
electrolyzer equipped with a cooling jacket. The cath-
odic and anodic compartments were separated with a
ceramic diaphragm (Fig. 4 in [11]). The volume of the
cathodic compartment was 300 ml, and the cathode
surface area, 60 cm . The solution was stirred with a
power-driven stirrer.
cient to ensure the conductivity required for prepara-
tive electrolyses. Preliminary experiments showed that
in methanolic solutions of sodium methylate of the
concentration up to 0.7 M butyl iodide is not notice-
ably saponified at room temperature. Experiments
with lead, mercury, tin, and zinc cathodes showed
that these cathodes degrade under the process condi-
tions. From the solution obtained by electrolysis
with a lead cathode, we isolated and identified tri-
2
Gaseous electrolysis products passed through a trap
cooled with an acetone dry ice mixture. Butane con-
densed in the trap. Hydrogen was collected in a Mari-
otte vessel. After electrolysis completion, the catho-
lyte was diluted with a threefold amount of water to
separate crude octane, which was dried and analyzed
chromatographically.
butyllead iodide Bu PbI (found, %: C 28.6; H 5.55;
3
I 25.0. C H PbI. Calculated, %: C 27.9; H 5.30;
1
2
27
I 24.0). Similar organometallic compounds can be
expected to form with the other degradable cathodes,
but we did not isolate and identify them. Table 1
shows that the best yields are attained with copper and
iron cathodes. However, the reduction on iron is slow-
er than on copper, as judged from the higher yield
of hydrogen on the iron cathode. The high yield of
butane on the zinc cathode is probably due to the fact
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 97-03-
32265).
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 71 No. 7 2001