(entry 1 in Table 1). It is notable that no homo-coupling
products were detected under these conditions. Under the
same conditions, p-methoxyphenyl(phenyl)iodonium salt 2b
as electrophile, p-methoxyphenyl transferred product 3b10
was afforded as the sole product (entry 2). This method was
applied to alkenyl-substituted iodonium salt 2d, and the
coupled enyne 3d8a was obtained in 70% yield (entry 4).
1-Hexyne 1b and propargyl alcohol 1c were utilized in this
coupling method. 1-Hexyne (1b) was treated with iodonium
salts 2a and 2c to afford the coupling products 3e8a and 3f8a
(entries 5 and 6). The substituted propargyl alcohols 1c and
1d were also used in the copper-catalyzed cross-coupling
(entries 8-13). This copper-catalyzed cross-coupling method
was extended to electron-deficient alkynes. Ethyl propiolate
was reacted with iodonium salts 2a and 2c to afford the aryl-
substituted propiolates 3n11 and 3o12 in 68 and 62% yields,
respectively (entries 14 and 15).11
Table 2. One-Pot Direct Cross-Coupling of Acetylenic Alcohol
with Hypervalent Iodonium Salts in the Presence of CuI under
Basic Conditions
entry
substrate
iodonium salt
product
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3j
3j
3j
3j
3k
3l
3m
2a
2b
2c
2d
2a
2a
2a
3a
2b
3c
3d
3b
3c
3d
80
70
62
63
66
60
56
p-methoxyphenyl(phenyl)iodonium salt 2b in the presence
of CuI (10 mol %) with NaOH and 1-butanol at reflux for
24 h to afford the disubstituted acetylene 3b in 70% yield
(entry 1 in Table 2). Under the same conditions, the
acetylenic alcohol 3j was treated with iodonium salts 2c and
2d to provide 3c8a and 3d (entries 2 and 3). Alternatively,
the acetylenic alcohols 3k-3m were readily deprotected and
coupled in a one-pot procedure under the same conditions
to give 3b, 3c, and 3d in moderate yields (entries 4-6).
In summary, we have developed a new and mild protocol
for Sonogashira coupling with CuI as catalyst utilizing
hypervalent iodonium salts as the electrophilic coupling
partners and multiple Sonogashira reactions for the synthesis
of disubstituted acetylenes.
Next we investigated the one-pot and direct coupling of
the acetylenic alcohols 3j-3m with hypervalent iodonium
salts in the presence of copper catalyst CuI under basic
conditions. Indeed, acetylenic alcohols 3j-3m can be
transformed into arylethynes under these conditions (Scheme
2).18,19
Scheme 2
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by a National
Research Laboratory Grant by the Korea Ministry of Science
and Technology and KOSEF-CMDS (Center for Molecular
Design and Synthesis).
OL0162825
The results of the direct and one-pot cross-coupling of
acetylenic alcohol 3 with hypervalent iodonium salts 2 under
copper catalysis to form disubstituted acetylenes are sum-
marized in Table 2. The acetylenic alcohol 3j reacted with
NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.35 (t, 3H, J ) 7 Hz), 4.30 (q, 2H, J ) 7 Hz)
7.37 (m, 2H), 7.44 (m, 1H), 7.58 (m, 2h); IR (neat) ν ) 3083, 3038, 2985,
2210, 1715, 1491, 1368, 1240 cm-1; ΗRMS calcd for C11H10O2 174.0681,
found 174.0680. 3o: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.35 (t, 3H, J ) 7 Hz),
4.30 (q, 2H, J ) 7 Hz) 7.05 (m, 1H), 7.47 (m, 2H); IR (neat) ν ) 3091,
2989, 2214, 2129, 1769, 1665, 1584, 1470, 1370, 1271 cm-1; ΗRMS calcd
for C9H8O2S 180.0245, found 180.0245.
(15) Berigbreite, D. E.; Liu, Y. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 38, 7843-
7846.
(16) Mal’kina, A. G.; Brandsma, L.; Vasilevsky, B. A.; Trofima, B. A.
Synthesis 1996, 589-590.
(17) Ooi. T.; Miura, T.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
10790-10791.
(10) Kang, S.-K.; Baik, T.-G.; Song, S.-Y. Synlett 1999, 327-329.
(11) Recently Stang et al. reported the palladium-catalyzed arylation of
electron-deficient alkynes using diaryliodonium salts. See: Radhakrishnan,
U.; Stang, P. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 859-860.
(12) Brittain, J. M.; Jones, A.; Taheri, A. N. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 7609-
7618.
(13) Hurley, A. L.; Welker, M. E.; Day, C. S. J. Organomet. Chem.
2000, 150-159.
(14) The spectral and physical data of 3h, 3j, 3k, 3l, 3m, 3n and 3o. 3h:
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.63 (t, 1H, J ) 6 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 4.49
(d, 2H, J ) 6 Hz), 6.84 (dd, 2H, J ) 6.5, 2 Hz), 7.38 (dd, 2H, J ) 6.5, 2
Hz); IR (KBr) ν ) 3250, 2963, 2233, 1603, 1509, 1291, 1253 cm-1; ΗRMS
calcd for C10H10O2 162.0681, found 162.0682. 3j: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.62 (s, 6H), 7.28 (m, 3H), 7.41 (m, 2H); IR (KBr) ν ) 3395,
3058, 2983, 2232, 1953, 1881, 1598, 1490 cm-1; ΗRMS calcd for C11H12O
160.0888, found 160.0889. 3k: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.61 (s,
6H), 3.80 (s 3H), 6.82 (d, 2H J ) 9 Hz), 7.35 (d, 2H J ) 9 Hz); IR (KBr)
ν ) 3378, 3043, 2981, 2839, 2228, 1607, 1510, 1463, 1249 cm-1; ΗRMS
calcd for C12H14O2 190.0994, found 190.0994. 3l: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.61 (s, 6H), 6.94 (m, 1H), 7.17 (m, 1H), 7.22 (m, 1H); IR (KBr)
ν ) 3357, 3108, 2983, 2222, 1518, 1452, 1261 cm-1; ΗRMS calcd for
(18) The direct cross-coupling between acetylenic alcohols and aryl halide
under basic conditions with Pd(0)/CuI catalysts is known. See: Chow, H.-
F.; Wan, C.-W.; Low, K.-H.; Yeung, Y.-Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1910-
1913.
(19) Typical procedure is as follows. To stirred solution of 2-methyl-4-
phenyl-3-butyn-2-ol (3j) (1.00 g, 6.24 mmol), 4-methoxyphenyl(phenyl)-
iodonium tetrafluoroborate (2b) (2.49 g, 6.24 mmol), and CuI (0.12 g, 0.63
mmol) in butanol (10 mL) was added NaOH (2.00 g, 49.92 mmol). The
reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 24 h and then quenched with a
saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution (5 mL). The reaction mixture was
extracted with diethyl ether (20 mL × 3), and the organic layer was dried
over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was
separated by SiO2 column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane ) 1:10, Rf )
0.52) to give 1-methoxy-4-(phenylethynyl)benzene (3b) (910 mg, 70%):
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ ) 3.83 (s, 3H), 6.88 (d, 2H, J ) 8.5 Hz),
1
C9H10OS 166.0452, found 166.0453. 3m: H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
1.62 (s, 6H), 6.16 (d, 1H, J ) 16.5 Hz), 6.93 (d, 1H, J ) 16.5 Hz), 7.35
(m, 5H); IR (KBr) ν ) 3356, 3029, 2981, 2213, 1491, 1448, 1366, 1164,
953 cm-1; ΗRMS calcd for C13H14O 186.1045, found 186.1048. 3n: 1H
7.29 (m, 3H), 7.49 (m, 4H); IR (KBr) ν ) 3080, 2958, 1617, 1405 cm-1
MS (m/e) ) 208 (M+), 207 (base peak), 193, 165.
;
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 17, 2001
2699