5648
M. D. Mosher et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 5647–5648
Table 1
a
3-substituted-4-bromo-5-methyl-4,5-dihydroisoxazole—is not
Yield of title reaction outlined in Scheme 2
observed in the reaction mixture. We postulate, however, that a
tri-substituted 4,5-dihydroisoxazole could be produced if the start-
ing oxime was conjugated. Efforts are currently underway to ex-
plore such a possibility.
Entry
Compound (R=)
Spectroscopic yielda (%)
Isolated yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
p-CH3O–Ph–
p-CH3–Ph–
20-naphthyl
Ph–CH2–CH2–
CH3(CH2)4CH2–
>98%
>97
95
>90
>90
79
65
84
In summary, treatment of substituted b,c-unsaturated oximes
35c
40c
with bromine provides the expected 3-substituted-5-bromo-
methyl-4,5-dihydroisoxazoles. Isolated yields were consistently
better for the aryl substituted dihydroisoxazoles, but even the alkyl
substituted oximes provided the desired products in acceptable
yield. The products, primary bromides, provide a functional group
handle that should be able to be further modified by nucleophilic
substitution.
a
Spectroscopic yields were determined by H NMR of an aliquot of the crude
reaction mixture.
b
Isolated yields express the yield of the product after workup and chromato-
graphic separation.
c
Isolated products spectroscopically agreed with the literature values. See Ref. 13.
primary bromide with the TLC stationary phase. Instead, reaction
progress was monitored by withdrawing aliquots from the reaction
mixture and obtaining proton NMR data on the crude reaction mix-
ture. In all cases examined, the reaction appeared to be complete
(the presence of the starting material was not detected) after
30 min stirring at room temperature. Isolation of the desired prod-
ucts was, in some cases, significantly lower than the NMR yield.
Again, this was mostly likely due to the ease of reaction of the pri-
mary bromide with the chromatographic stationary phase.
Based on the data given in Table 1, the reaction appears to be
compatible with both aryl and alkyl substitutions. While the iso-
lated yield of the 4,5-dihydroisoxazole does appear to reflect the
geometry of the starting oxime (syn or anti) mixture as determined
by proton NMR, that geometry was judged to not play a role in the
reaction due to the spectroscopically determined yield prior to iso-
Acknowledgment
Acknowledgment is made to the Department of Chemistry at
the University of Nebraska at Kearney for partial financial support
of this work.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. For examples, see: (a) Churykau, D. H.; Zinovich, V. G.; Kulinkovich, O. G. Synlett
2004, 1949; (b) Baraldi, P. G.; Barco, A.; Benetti, S.; Manfredini, S.; Simoni, D.
Synthesis 1987, 276; (c) Jiang, D.; Chen, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9181.
2. Jaeger, V.; Grund, H. Angewandte 1976, 88, 27.
3. For examples, see: (a) Jaeger, V.; Buss, V.; Schwab, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978,
3133; (b) Das, B.; Holla, H.; Srinivas, Y.; Venkateswarlu, K. Indian J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 2007, 17, 1; (c) Chandrasekhar, S.; Babu, B. N.; Ahmed, M.; Reddy, M. V.;
Srihari, P.; Jagadeesh, B.; Prabhakar, A. Synlett 2004, 1303.
4. (a) Moriya, O.; Nakamura, H.; Kageyama, T.; Urata, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30,
3987; (b) Garanti, L.; Zecchi, G. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1980, 17, 609; (c) Loubinoux,
B.; Gerardin, P.; Schneider, R.; Ahrach, M.; Boelle, J. Trends Heterocycl. Chem.
1995, 4, 135; (d) Kotyatkina, A. I.; Zhabinsky, V. N.; Khripach, V. A. Russ. Chem.
Rev. 2001, 70, 641.
5. (a) Wagner, G.; Danks, T. N.; Vullo, V. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5251; (b)
Kuznetsov, M. L.; Nazarov, A. A.; Kozlova, L. V.; Kukushkin, V. Y. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 4475; (c) Zhang, Y.-M.; Wang, R.-X.; Xu, W.-R.; Liu, C.-B. Huaxue
Xuebao 2005, 63, 567. Chem. Abs. 143:439724; (d) Houk, K. N.; Chang, Y.-M.;
Strozier, R. W.; Caramella, P. Heterocycles 1977, 7, 793; (e) Chang, Y.-M.; Sims,
J.; Houk, K. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 4445; (f) Alami, A.; Soufiaoui, M. J. Soc.
Marocaine Chim. 1992, 1, 34.
lation. In fact, the aryl substituted b,c-unsaturated oximes were
very well behaved in the reaction, and the isolation of the aryl-
dihydroisoxazoles from the reaction mixture was relatively easy.
The alkyl substituted compounds were less well behaved and dif-
ficult to isolate—as evidenced by extensive streaking on TLC plates.
We postulate that the mechanism of this reaction (Scheme 3)
involves the initial addition of bromine to the alkene to form the
well-defined cyclic bromonium ion.10 Formation of this intermedi-
ate activates the molecule for attack by the internal hydroxyl
nucleophile. Subsequent ring opening gives the expected 4,5-
dihydroisoxazole with a C5-bromomethyl group. The 4,5-dihyd-
roisoxazole formed in this regiochemically controlled fashion is
racemic at C5. This mechanism stands in contrast to the isomeriza-
tion observed in the base-catalyzed cyclization of b,
c
-unsaturated
oximes7—where the thermodynamically more stable
a
,b-unsatu-
6. Norman, A. L.; Mosher, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4153.
7. Norman, A. L.; Shurrush, K. A.; Calleroz, A. T.; Mosher, M. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 6849.
rated oxime forms rapidly under the reaction conditions.
Evidence that the alkene moiety does not migrate into conjuga-
tion is illustrated by the fact that the product of such a migration—
8. General procedure for the preparation of the title compounds: to a 250 mL round-
bottomed flask containing a stir bar and wrapped in aluminum foil were added
80 mL anhydrous CH2Cl2 (freshly distilled from calcium hydride) and the
respective oxime (6.0 mmol).11 The solution was vigorously stirred at room
temperature while a CH2Cl2 solution of Br2 (approximately 0.10 M, 6.6 mmol)
was added dropwise by glass syringe. The red solution was stirred for 30 min in
the dark. Then 25 mL distilled water was added and stirring was continued for
an additional 5 min. The contents of the reaction vessel were then transferred
to
a separatory funnel and the organic phase was washed with water
(80 mL ꢀ 1), sodium bisulfite solution (80 mL ꢀ 1), water (80 mL ꢀ 1), sodium
bicarbonate solution (5%, 80 mL ꢀ 1), and brine (80 mL). The yellow organic
phase was then dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to dryness
on the rotary evaporator to give
a crude yellow–red mixture. Flash
chromatography12 of the crude product on silica gel (8:2 hexane/ethyl
acetate) gave the desired product as an off-white solid.
9. (a) Nagarajan, A.; Pillay, M. K. J. Ind. Chem. Soc. 1993, 70, 174; (b) Dondoni, A.;
Taddei, F. Boll. Sci. Fac. Chim. Ind. Bologna. 1967, 25, 145.
10. Modro, A.; Schmid, G. H.; Yates, K. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 3673.
11. Mosher, M. D.; Emmerich, L. G.; Frost, K. S.; Anderson, B. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
2006, 43, 535.
12. Still, W. C.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2923.
13. Ha, S. J.; Lee, G. H.; Yoon, I. K.; Pak, C. S. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 3165.
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism of electrophilic bromination.