Article
crystals and investigate whether any deꢁects were present. As observed levels in the middle oꢁ the bandgap) to the ‘shallower’ peaks 2 and 3 that
in Fig. 2d, LiInP Se exhibits two broad PL peaks at low temperature emit ꢁrom energy levels closer to the band edge. DAP recombination
2
6
(12.5 K), which can be modelled by three Gaussian peaks. A two-peak ꢁit occurs between a donor and an acceptor band, both oꢁ which must lie
was attempted, but it was ꢁound to require the use oꢁ an exponentially deep enough within the bandgap to avoid being ionized, whereas a ꢁree-
37
modiꢁied Gaussian peak as described in reꢁ. to adequately model the to-bound transition is between a single deꢁect band and the opposite
asymmetry oꢁ the higher energy band. However, the use oꢁ such a peak band edge, so it is only as deep as the deꢁect band. At 1.73 eV, peak 1 lies
is not justiꢁied here because the source oꢁ emission is not the result oꢁ a well below the band edge (2.06 eV at room temperature) while peaks 2
distribution oꢁ phonon-related peaks. Hence, these emission bands are and 3 are much closer to the bandgap at 1.98 eV and 2.06 eV, respectively.
best ꢁitted using three Gaussian peaks, where peaks 2 and 3 correspond Together with the diꢁꢁerence in temperature-dependent behaviour,
to the same broad band so they are expected to show similar behaviour. this supports the assignment oꢁ peak 1 to DAP recombination and oꢁ
To ꢁurther characterize the PL emission at 12.5 K, the PL dependence peaks 2 and 3 to a ꢁree-to-bound transition. The PL measurements are
on the excitation intensity was tested by increasing the laser power summarized in Extended Data Fig. 3ꢁ, along with these tentative peak
ꢁ
rom 0.5 mW to 21 mW, resulting in corresponding enhancements in assignments. These results reveal the presence oꢁ at least two deꢁect lev-
the emission intensity and a slight blueshiꢁt in the peak maxima ꢁor all els, which should be identiꢁied and removed. Nevertheless, the presence
three peaks (Extended Data Fig. 3a). oꢁ a strong PL signal ꢁrom an indirect-gap material is an indication oꢁ
The PL intensity Ihas a power-law dependence on the laser power Lin good optical quality and the removal oꢁ these deꢁects promises ꢁurther
k
38
the ꢁorm I ∝ L with the behaviour governed by the exponent k (reꢁ. ). improvements in the detector perꢁormance oꢁ LiInP Se .
2
6
Excitonic emission shows superlinear behaviour with increasing exci-
tation intensity, corresponding to a coeꢁꢁicient oꢁ 1 < k < 2, whereas
Data availability
ꢁ
ree-to-bound and donor–acceptor pair (DAP) recombination pro-
cesses have a power-law coeꢁꢁicient kbelow 1. This coeꢁꢁicient can be The data that support the ꢁindings oꢁ this study are available ꢁrom the
derived ꢁrom the slope oꢁ a plot oꢁ logI versus logL ꢁor each peak, as corresponding author upon request.
shown in Extended Data Fig. 3b. Each oꢁ the three peaks observed in
LiInP Se has a power-law coeꢁꢁicient below 1 (Extended Data Fig. 3b),
23. Feher, F. Handbuch der Präparativen Anorganischen Chemie (F. Enke, 1954).
24. Aitken, J. A., Cowen, J. A. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Metamagnetic transition in EuSe : a new,
2
2
6
so these emissions are a result oꢁ either ꢁree-to-bound transitions or
DAP recombination. We note the essentially identical behaviour oꢁ
peaks 2 and 3; these peaks correspond to the same band and thus
have the same power-law coeꢁꢁicient oꢁ 0.91 ± 0.04. The temperature
dependence oꢁ PL at 2 mW demonstrates that the higher-energy emis-
sion quenches ꢁirst, with peaks 2 and 3 merging at 70 K and vanishing
by 90 K, and peak 1 persisting until about 150 K (Extended Data Fig. 3c).
The energies oꢁ peaks 2 and 3 blueshiꢁt slightly as the temperature
rises, whereas peak 1 redshiꢁts dramatically between 12.5 K and 150 K
metastable binary rare-earth polychalcogenide. Chem. Mater. 10, 3928–3935 (1998).
5. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT – integrated space-group and crystal- structure determination.
Acta Crystallogr. A 71, 3–8 (2014).
2
2
2
6. Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure reꢀinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C 71, 3–8
(2015).
7. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a
complete structure solution, reꢀinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42,
3
39–341 (2009).
2
8. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric
and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).
29. Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R. & Michaelides, A. Chemical accuracy for the van der Waals
density functional. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2010).
0. Setyawan, W. & Curtarolo, S. High-throughput electronic band structure calculations:
(
Extended Data Fig. 3d). This redshiꢁt causes the low-energy tail oꢁ
3
peak 1 to ꢁall past the response limit oꢁ the photomultiplier tube
challenges and tools. Comput. Mater. Sci. 49, 299–312 (2010).
(
ꢁ
1.46 eV), producing an artiꢁicial asymmetry; thus, above 55 K the
it ignores data below 1.48 eV to accurately reproduce the Gaussian
peak shape.
PL quenching occurs when a nonradiative recombination process
competes ꢁor the photogenerated carriers involved in the emission. The
temperature dependence oꢁ this quenching behaviour can be modelled
3
3
3
4. Owens, A. & Peacock, A. Compound semiconductor radiation detectors. Nucl. Instrum.
Methods Phys. Res. A 531, 18–37 (2004).
5. Binnewies, M., Glaum, R., Schmidt, M. & Schmidt, P. in Chemical Vapor Transport
Reactions 452–457 (De Gruyter, 2012).
6. Binnewies, M., Glaum, R., Schmidt, M. & Schmidt, P. in Chemical Vapor Transport
Reactions 165–166 (De Gruyter, 2012).
39
using an Arrhenius plot, ꢁollowing the ꢁrequently used expression :
−
1
E
a
37. McCall, K. M., Stoumpos, C. C., Kostina, S. S., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Wessels, B. W. Strong
electron–phonon coupling and self-trapped excitons in the defect halide perovskites
I(T) = I0 1 + a exp −
(1)
kT
A
3 2 9
M I (A = Cs, Rb; M = Bi, Sb). Chem. Mater. 29, 4129–4145 (2017).
3
8. Schmidt, T., Lischka, K. & Zulehner, W. Excitation-power dependence of the near-band-
where I0 is the PL intensity at 0 K, a is a constant, k is the Boltzmann
edge photoluminescence of semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 45, 8989–8994 (1992).
constant and E is the activation energy corresponding to the compet-
39. Pankove, J. I. Optical processes in semiconductors (Dover, 1971).
a
4
4
4
0. Pelant, I. & Valenta, J. Luminescence Spectroscopy of Semiconductors (Oxford Univ.
ing nonradiative recombination. This model corresponds to the sim-
ple case oꢁ a single nonradiative transition, and adequately describes
the Arrhenius plots oꢁ the integrated PL intensity versus the inverse
temperature, as indicated by the solid lines in Extended Data Fig. 3e.
The activation energies oꢁ the nonradiative quenching processes are
determined to be 40.0 ± 6.6 meV, 15.2 ± 6.2 meV and 16.8 ± 3.4 meV ꢁor
peaks 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Again, the behaviours oꢁ peaks 2 and 3
are quite similar, indicating that they should have the same emission
mechanism.
Press, 2012).
1. Veale, M. C. et al. X-ray spectroscopy and charge transport properties of CdZnTe grown
by the vertical Bridgman method. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 576, 90–94 (2007).
2. Watanabe, S. et al. Stacked CdTe gamma-ray detector and its application to a range
ꢀinder. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 505, 118–121 (2003).
Acknowledgements The exploratory synthesis and materials characterization work was
supported by the National Science Foundation through grant DMR-1708254. The device
fabrication and neutron response measurements were supported by Laboratory Directed
Research and Development (LDRD) funding from Argonne National Laboratory, provided by
the Director, Ofꢀice of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE-
AC02-06CH11357. PL measurements were supported by the Murphy Fellowship from
Northwestern University. This work made use of the SPID and EPIC facilities of Northwestern
University’s NUANCE Center, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid
Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205); the MRSEC
programme (NSF DMR-1720139) at the Materials Research Center; the International Institute for
Nanotechnology (IIN); the Keck Foundation; and the State of Illinois, through IIN. This work
used the Northwestern University’s Keck Biophysics Facility, which is funded by a Cancer
Center Support Grant (NCI CA060553). This work made use of IMSERC at Northwestern
University, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology
Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF ECCS-1542205), the State of Illinois and IIN.
The power-law coeꢁꢁicients oꢁ all three peaks are consistent with
either DAP recombination or ꢁree-to-bound transitions, whereas the
energy oꢁ each peak blueshiꢁts with increasing excitation intensity, as
40
expected ꢁor DAP recombination . However, the temperature-depend-
ent behaviour oꢁ peak 1 is markedly diꢁꢁerent ꢁrom that oꢁ peaks 2 and 3,
with diꢁꢁerent energy shiꢁts as the temperature increases and distinct
quenching processes ꢁor the two bands. To assign these accurately, we
compare the relatively ‘deep’ energy oꢁ peak 1 (coming ꢁrom energy