catalyst. They attributed the main reason leading to its
remarkable CO oxidation activity to the formation of
CuMn O on the surface of this catalyst. The structure of
Conclusions
The addition of Ag and Ba to manganese oxide can improve
2
4
the CH oxidation activity of the resulting catalysts, with the
this
CuMn O
spinel
can
be
described
as
4
2
4
activity sequence BaMn0.10 [ AgMn0.10 [ MnO . However,
Cu`[Mn3`Mn4`]O 2~.27,28 They suggested that the
coexistence of Mn3` and Mn4` in the structure resulted in
x
4
a comparative study showed that only Ag can markedly
enhance the CO oxidation activity of manganese oxide, while
the activity of BaMn0.10 is basically unchanged compared to
ready electron transfer between Mn in di†erent oxidation
states, since this can occur without the cations changing their
positions. As a result, this catalyst shows superior CO oxida-
tion activity.20,27 Interestingly, in this study, composite oxides
such as Ag Mn O , BaMn O and BaMnO are formed in
that of MnO .
x
Based on our characterization results, it is believed that the
enhanced CH oxidation activity of AgMn0.10 is attributable
4
2
8 16
8 16
3
to the presence of a large amount of mobile and reactive
AgMn0.10 and BaMn0.10, respectively. Similarly to
oxygen species, perhaps as a consequence of the formation of
Ag Mn O in this catalyst. This conclusion is further sup-
CuMn O , both Mn3` and Mn4` are present in Ag Mn O
2
4
2
8 16
and BaMn O . On the surface of AgMn0.10, XPS indicates
2
8 16
8
16
that a considerable amount of Ag Mn O coexists with a-
8 16
Mn O . Therefore, possibly due to the same inherent reason
ported by its superior CO oxidation activity, as previous
studies have shown that mobile and reactive oxygen species
are critical for e†ective CO oxidation over a catalyst.
2
2
3
as Hopcalite catalyst, AgMn0.10 shows also remarkable CO
However, the mobility and reactivity of oxygen species are
not as crucial for CH oxidation as for CO oxidation, though
they are important. The rupture of the Ðrst CÈH bond of CH
is very difficult and generally regarded as the rate-determining
step. In this study, it was found that the mobility and reacti-
vity of the oxygen species in BaMn0.10 is not improved over
oxidation activity and enhanced CH deep oxidation activity.
4
However, for BaMn0.10, though XPS also shows the
4
coexistence of BaMn O and a-Mn O on its surface, the
4
8
16
2 3
amount of BaMn O is very low. Therefore, it seems that
8
16
the enhanced CH oxidation activity of BaMn0.10 cannot
4
simply be ascribed to easy electron transfer between Mn3`
MnO , thus resulting in no improvement in the CO oxidation
and Mn4` in the structure.
x
activity of this catalyst. However, the basicity of the lattice
In the present work, CH -TPR and O -TPD demonstrated
4
2
O2~ can be enhanced via Ba addition, which is believed to be
the presence of a large amount of more reducible and mobile
oxygen species in AgMn0.10. Indeed, this could relate to the
formation of Ag Mn O in this sample, and result from the
favorable for the activation of the Ðrst CÈH bond in CH . It
4
is thus concluded that the CH oxidation activity of
4
2
8 16
BaMn0.10 is markedly enhanced due to this modiÐcation
facile electron transfer between Mn3` and Mn4`. The pres-
ence of more mobile and reactive oxygen species has been
proven previously to be crucial for the signiÐcantly enhanced
CO oxidation activity of AgÈMn composite oxide catalysts,
which are able to increase the rates of the overall reaction
e†ect of Ba.
Acknowledgement
remarkably.9h11 We thus attribute the enhanced CH and CO
Financial support from the National Science Foundation of
China is greatfully acknowledged by the authors.
4
oxidation activity of AgMn0.10 to the presence of more
mobile and reactive oxygen species in this sample.
However, in this study, there is no proof to show that the
mobility of the lattice oxygen of BaMn0.10 is improved; on
References
the contrary, CH -TPR results demonstrate that the
1
2
3
Y. Li and J. N. Armor, Appl. Catal., B, 1994, 3, 275.
4
reducibility and activity is somewhat decreased. This could be
W. S. Epling and G. B. HoÑund, J. Catal., 1999, 182, 5.
Lj. Kundakovic and M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Appl. Catal. A,
the reason why the CO oxidation activity is not enhanced but
1
999, 183, 35.
remains unchanged when compared with MnO . In contrast,
x
as mentioned above, BaMn0.10 displays the best CH oxida-
4
4
5
E. S. Rubin, R. N. Cooper, R. A. Frosch, T. H. Lee, G. Marland,
A. H. RosenÐeld and D. D. Stine, Science, 1992, 257, 148.
M. M. Zwinkel, S. G. Jaras and P. C. Menon, Catal. Rev. Sci.
Eng., 1993, 35, 319.
tion activity among the three samples. This seems to imply
that the addition of Ba produces some suitable sites or cata-
lytic functions for e†ective CH oxidation.
6
7
C. F. Cullis and B. M. Willat, J. Catal., 1983, 83, 267.
R. F. Hicks, H. Qi, M. L. Young and R. G. Lee, J. Catal., 1990,
4
CH is well known to be the most difficult to oxidize
4
1
22, 280.
among all of the hydrocarbons, since the molecule contains
8
9
K. Sekizawa, H. Widjaja, S. Maeda, Y. Ozawa and K. Eguchi,
Appl. Catal., A, 2000, 200, 211.
only very strong CÈH bonds.1 The Ðssion of the Ðrst CÈH
bond could be the rate-determining step for CH oxidation,
S. Imamura, H. Sawada, K. Uemura and S. Ishida, J. Catal.,
1988, 109, 198.
4
and needs high temperature.29h32 Indeed, the activation of
CH should be more difficult than CO on the catalysts, as
10 M.-F. Luo, X.-X. Yuan and X.-M. Zheng, Appl. Catal., A, 1998,
4
175, 121.
demonstrated by the higher activation energy of CH as
4
opposed to CO oxidation. When studying CH oxidative
4
1
1 K.-S. Song, S.-K. Kang and S. D. Kim, Catal. L ett., 1997, 49, 65.
12 M. I. Zaki, M. A. Hasan, L. Pasupulety, N. E. Fouad and H.
coupling, Campbell et al.32 found that the relative activity of
Knozinger, New J. Chem., 1999, 23, 1197.
M. Baldi, V. S. Escribano, J. M. G. Amores, F. Milella and G.
rare-earth metal oxides parallels their basicity. It was pointed
out that this could be due to the better ability of more basic
1
3
Busca, Appl. Catal., B, 1998, 17, L175.
14 D. Mehandjiev, E. Zhecheva, G. Ivanov and R. Ioncheva, Appl.
Catal., A, 1998, 167, 277.
metal oxides to abstract one hydrogen atom from a CH mol-
4
ecule to form a methyl radical,32h34 the important interme-
1
5
G. J. Hutchings, A. A. Mirzaei, R. W. Joyner, M. R. H. Siddqui
and S. H. Taylor, Catal. L ett., 1996, 43, 21.
diate in the reaction. More recently, it has also been suggested
that for efficient activation of CH in combustion, highly basic
4
16 R. Burch, S. Chalker, G. D. Squire and S. C. Tsang, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday T rans., 1990, 86, 1607.
17 X. Wang and Y. C. Xie, Fenzi Cuihua, 1998, 12, 312.
18 X. Wang and Y. C. Xie, React. Kinet. Catal. L ett., 2000, 71, 263.
sites are required in a catalyst.29 Previous work has already
demonstrated that the alkalization of metal oxides such as
manganese oxides or tin oxide with Li, K or Ba can improve
the basicity of their lattice oxygen or form more basic
sites.32h35 We thus speculate that in this study, the predomi-
1
2
2
9
0
1
E. C. Pitzer and J. C. W. Frazer, J. Phys. Chem., 1941, 45, 761.
S. B. Kanungo, J. Catal., 1979, 58, 419.
X. Wang and Y. C. Xie, React. Kinet. Catal. L ett., 2000, 70, 43.
nant reason leading to the enhanced CH oxidation activity of
4
22 E. R. Stobbe, B. A. De Boer and J. W. Geus, Catal. T oday, 1999,
the Ba-modiÐed manganese oxide catalysts could actually be
47, 161.
attributed to their improved basicity, which is favorable for
23 H. Kung and M. Kung, Adv. Catal., 1984, 33, 159.
24 I. R. Leith and M. G. Howden, Appl. Catal., 1988, 37, 75.
the activation of the Ðrst CÈH bonds in CH .
4
968
New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 964È969