1584
Replacing Pt with other metals might be difficult due to corro-
sion issues. While Pt forms a bromide salt, PtBr2 is unstable above
523 K. However, there are conductive ceramics, such as dope SrTiO3
[13,14], that deliver high conductivities and are reasonably stable in
harsh environments. Although ceramic materials are less catalyti-
cally active than Pt, it may be possible to enhance their performance
by doping with small amounts of catalytically active metals [15,16].
Alternatively, the results presented here suggest that one could
work at much higher temperatures where the electrode, catalytic
requirements might be less stringent. Vaporization of the elec-
trolyte salt should not be a limiting factor, since the salt could
be easily replaced by a salt reservoir at the edges of the scaffold
medium.
In summary, the results in this paper suggest that reasonable
performance can be achieved for HBr electrolysis using molten,
alkali-bromide electrolytes. Further investigation into electrode
materials will be needed; however, the inherent advantages of pro-
ducing a concentrated Br2 stream suggest this work is justified.
Fig. 5. V–i polarization curves of the cell using the (Li0.56K0.19Cs0.25)Br electrolyte,
measured at 773 K using the following conditions: (P(HBr), P(H2)) = (0.05 atm,
0.3 atm) (ꢀ) and (0.4 atm, 0.1 atm) (ꢀ) on the HBr electrode. The P(Br2) was fixed at
0.3 atm on the Br2 electrode.
4. Conclusion
relationships were also not linear, with the “S” shape of the V–i
curve being especially noticeable at 773 K. The fact that there is no
break in the slopes of the V–i curves at open circuit implies that
HBr production side, is likely associated with the low H2 partial
pressures.
The Cole–Cole Plots of the impedance spectra, measured at
0.55 V and the conditions of Fig. 4(a), are shown in Fig. 4(b). Interest-
ingly, the ohmic losses at these two temperatures were similar and
relatively small, 1 ꢀcm2 at 773 K and 1.5 ꢀcm2. This would sug-
is weakly dependent on temperature, so long as the salts exist
in their molten state. The differences in the ohmic losses for the
molten NaBr and the molten eutectic mixture are also not sig-
nificant. The main difference in the cell performances at the two
temperatures in Fig. 4 was that the non-ohmic losses decreased
with increasing temperature, from 18 ꢀcm2 at 673 K to 6 ꢀcm2
at 773 K. Since the non-ohmic losses are associated with the elec-
trodes, this result implies that the performance is limited by the
electrodes. The strong temperature effect is likely due to increases
in the chemical reaction rates, since changes in gas-phase diffusiv-
ity with temperature would be inconsequential.
Electrolytic oxidation of HBr to H2 and Br2 using a mem-
brane that is a bromide-ion conductor has significant advantages
over membranes that are proton conducting because Br2 can be
produced as a concentrated stream. The results in this paper
demonstrate that molten alkali-bromide salts exhibit good ionic
conductivities and could be effective as electrolytes for this appli-
cation. Although Pt is an effective material for both electrodes in
this application, the possibility of using less expensive materials is
feasible due to the possibility of using high temperatures in this
application.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Hydro-
gen Fuel Initiative (grant DE-FG02-05ER15721). We would like to
thank Prof. Eric McFarland and Dr. Anna Ivanovskaya for helpful
suggestions.
Dr. J.-S. Park also acknowledges support from the National
Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Gov-
References
Finally, the effect of changing the partial pressures of H2 and
HBr was investigated on the (Li0.56K0.19Cs0.25)Br cell at 773 K, while
holding the Br2 pressure fixed at 0.3 atm on the Br2 electrode. Fig. 5
shows V–i polarization curves with a relatively low HBr partial pres-
sure (P(HBr) of 0.05 atm and P(H2) of 0.3 atm) and a relatively low
H2 partial pressure (P(HBr) of 0.4 atm and P(H2) of 0.1 atm). The OCV
measured with P(HBr) and P(H2) of 0.05 and 0.3 atm, respectively,
was 0.72 V, the same as the theoretical value. The OCV decreased
to 0.45 V at the higher P(HBr). Under HBr electrolysis conditions,
the slope of V–i polarization curve decreased dramatically with
increasing P(HBr).
[1] Bromine, organic compounds, in: David Ioffe, Arieh Kampf (Eds.), Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 2002, p. 340.
[2] A. Breed, M.F. Doherty, S. Gadewar, P. Grosso, I.M. Lorkovic, E.W. McFarland,
M.J. Weiss, Catal. Today 106 (2005) 301.
[3] X.-P. Zhou, A. Yilmaz, G.A. Yilmaz, I.M. Lorkovic, L.E. Laverman, M. Weiss, J.H.
Sherman, E.W. McFarland, G.D. Stucky, P.C. Ford, Chem. Commun. 18 (2003)
2294.
[4] J.E. Kogel, N.C. Trivedi, J.M. Barker, S.T. Krukowski (Eds.), Industrial Minerals
& Rocks, 7th ed., Society of Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton, CO,
2006, p. 289.
[5] J. Hanrahan, H.L. Heaton, R.Z. Parker, US Patent no. 5,833,834 (1998).
[6] P. Sivasubramanian, R.P. Ramasamy, F.J. Freire, C.E. Holland, J.W. Weidner, Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 463.
The results from this study demonstrate that the performance of
cells with molten alkali bromides as electrolytes can be reasonably
good. Even with the relatively thick, low-porosity scaffolds used
to hold the molten electrolytes, the impedance spectra demon-
strate that the electrolyte losses in these cells can be relatively low.
The electrode losses are the more significant issue. The Pt elec-
trodes used here appear to be much more effective than carbon
electrodes used in the previous study by Wauters and Winnick [9],
even without any attempt to increase their porosity. However, it
would obviously be better if less costly materials than Pt could be
used.
[7] W. Kondo, S. Mizuta, Y. Oosaw, T. Kumagai, K. Fujii, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 56
(1983) 2504.
[8] N. Imanaka, Y. Kato, J. Mater. Sci. 40 (2005) 6495.
[9] C.N. Wauters, J. Winnick, AIChE J. 44 (1998) 2144.
[10] S. Park, R.J. Gorte, J.M. Vohs, J. Electrochem. Soc. 148 (2001) A443.
[11] W. Wang, J.M. Vohs, R.J. Gorte, Top. Catal. 46 (2007) 380.
[12] G.G. Diogenov, V.I. Ermachkov, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 12 (1967) 436 (Engl.
Transl.).
[13] S.Q. Hui, A. Petric, J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 (2002) J1.
[14] J. Canales-Vazquez, S.W. Tao, J.T.S. Irvine, Solid State Ionics 159 (2003) 159.
[15] S. Lee, G. Kim, J.M. Vohs, R.J. Gorte, J. Electrochem. Soc. 155 (2008) B1179.
[16] G. Kim, S. Lee, J.Y. Shin, G. Corre, J.T.S. Irvine, J.M. Vohs, R.J. Gorte, Electrochem.
Solid State Lett. 12 (2009) B48.