.
Angewandte
Communications
the rhodium carbene complex A; b) subsequent intramolec-
ular cyclization to afford the carbonyl ylide equivalent B (or
tautomerization to oxidopyrylium equivalent B’); c) proto-
nation of this transient species by 2 to afford ion pairs of the
stable isobenzopyrylium ion C and the conjugate base of 2;
and d) termination through a reduction of the cationic
intermediate C using the Hantzsch ester (4)[9] under the
influence of chiral conjugate base 2À to afford the isochro-
man-4-one derivative 5 in an optically active form.
At the outset of our studies, we conducted a control
experiment in the absence of the chiral catalyst 2. The
reaction was performed using the a-diazocarbonyl compound
3aa, 0.5 mol% of [Rh2(OAc)4] (1a), and 1.5 equivalents of
the Hantzsch ester (4) in CH2Cl2 at 308C for 5 hours (Table 1,
entry 1). The reaction proceeded cleanly to afford the racemic
high enantioselectivity, despite the fact that the reaction
proceeded without the chiral acid 2 under the same reaction
conditions (308C, 5 h; see entry 1 in Table 1).[12] Additional
optimization of the catalyst through changes in the substitu-
ent G and the backbone of the binaphthyl unit revealed that
slightly higher chemical yields and enantioselectivities were
obtained with the use of 2b bearing 9-phenanthryl substitu-
ents (Table 1, entry 3). Modification of the catalyst backbone,
thus the octahydrobinaphthyl 2c, however, resulted in
a decrease in the enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 4). Screen-
ing of reaction temperature led to disappointing results; the
enantioselectivities were reduced when the temperature was
decreased to 108C or increased to 408C (Table 1, entries 5 and
6). Additional investigation of the effect of the ester
substituent in diazocarbonyl compound 3 demonstrated that
the introduction of sterically less demanding substituents
proved to be beneficial for enantioselectivity; the enantiose-
lectivity of methyl ester 6ca is as high as that of ethyl ester 6aa
(Table 1, entries 3, 7, and 8).
Table 1: Optimization of relay catalysis reaction conditions.[a]
In an effort to gain mechanistic insight into the present
binary catalytic system, we attempted the reaction using
several dirhodium(II) tetracarboxylates 1, including chiral
dirhodium(II) complexes 1c–e (Table 2). As shown in
Table 1, entry 1, the diazocarbonyl 3aa underwent the con-
secutive reaction to give 5aa without the chiral acid 2,
whereas the enantioenriched 5aa was obtained in the
presence of the chiral acid 2. One plausible pathway to
afford the enantioenriched 5aa is that a chiral dirhodium(II)
complex possessing chiral phosphate ligand(s) may serve as
an enantioselective catalyst.[13] Thus, ligand exchange would
partially occur between the acetate groups in [Rh2(OAc)4]
(1a) and 2 to generate a chiral dirhodium(II) complex. We
therefore employed [Rh2(esp)2] (1b) having tethered dicar-
boxylate ligands[14] to prevent the plausible ligand exchange
reaction. As shown in entry 1 in Table 2 and entry 3 in
Table 1, comparable enantioselectivities were observed
despite the fact that the extent of the ligand exchange
should be different between 1a and 1b.[15] These results imply
that dirhodium(II) complexes, even when chiral dirhodi-
um(II) complexes might be generated, do not participate in
the stereo-determining step, which is the transient assembly
Entry
2
3
6
Yield [%][b]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
none
2a
2b
2c
2b
2b
2b
2b
3aa
3aa
3aa
3aa
3aa
3aa
3ba
3ca
6aa
6aa
6aa
6aa
6aa
6aa
6ba
6ca
91
88
90
85
81
82
85
83
–
89
90
80
84
88
60
90
5[d]
6[e]
7
8
[a] Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried out using 1a
(0.001 mmol, 0.5 mol%), (R)-2 (0.01 mmol, 5 mol%), 3 (0.2 mmol), and
4 (0.3 mmol) at 308C for 5 h. The solution of 3 in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was
added to the solution of 1a, (R)-2, and 4 in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) by syringe
pump over a 1 h period. [b] Yield of isolated 6 (2 steps). [c] The
enantiomeric excess of 6 was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral
stationary phase. The absolute configuration at the C1 of 5aa was
determined to be S by X-ray crystallographic analysis after derivatization
to the 4-bromobenzoyloxy isochromene derivative. See the Supporting
Information for details. [d] At 108C for 48 h. [e] At 408C for 4 h.
À
of the C H bond-forming step to generate the stereogenic
centers at C1 (and C3) of the isochromanone derivative 5aa.
To obtain direct evidence as to whether a dirhodium(II)
complex is involved in the stereo-determining step, we
investigated the consecutive transformation using the chiral
dirhodium(II) complexes 1c–e.[16,17] Although these three
chiral complexes have been reported as efficient enantiose-
lective catalysts in a range of organic transformations, these
complexes yielded the racemic products 5aa in the absence of
2 (Table 2, entries 2, 4, and 6). In sharp contrast, the combined
use of the chiral acid 2b with chiral dirhodium(II) complexes
resulted in the formation of the enantioenriched 5aa (Table 2,
entries 3, 5, and 7), with enantioselectivities as high as that
obtained by the original method using the achiral dirhodi-
um(II) 1a (see Table 1, entry 3). These results strongly
suggest that the present transformation sequence involves
a four-step process as proposed in Scheme 1 and, in the final
step, a rhodium-free intermediate, that is isobenzopyrylium C,
isochromanone derivative 5aa. The enol tautomer of 5aa was
then entrapped by a benzoyl group to afford the benzoyloxy
isochromene derivative 6aa as a racemic sample for chiral
stationary phase HPLC analysis. Although 3aa underwent the
transformation without 2, we investigated the proposed one-
pot relay catalysis in the presence of 5 mol% of the chiral acid
2a where G is a 9-anthryl group (Table 1, entry 2).[10,11]
Delightfully, the reaction sequence gave rise to 6aa with
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2093 –2097