1
026
S.E. San et al. / Polyhedron 30 (2011) 1023–1026
Table 1
Temperature and frequency dependencies of activation energies of ClGaPc and ClInPc.
T (eV)
ClGaPc
ClInPc
Region I
Region II
Region I
Region II
(
388–530) K
0.55216
1.6 kHz 0.56965
32 kHz
MHz
(304–388) K
(368–530) K
(304–368) K
1
1
1
1
kHz
0.35806
0.35369
0.12245
0.07845
0.36724
0.41145
0.49863
0.56793
0.47241
0.43099
0.17008
0.09303
0.73686
0.85373
There are many serious works revealing the current advances in
phthalocyanines as newsworthy and living materials in technology
[
19–24]. Our attempts to exploit DS for the characterization of
these functional materials are presented in this work.
4
. Conclusions
Temperature dependent dielectric properties of ClGaPc and
ClInPc compounds were analyzed to determine the dielectric prop-
erties of these Pc complexes after the insertion of gallium and in-
dium metals. Ga and In embedded Pcs showed the standard
temperature dependence characteristics of conventional semicon-
ductors. The temperature dependence of the conductivities of both
samples exhibited Arrhenius behavior. Our results suggest that the
ionic conductivity is activated at elevated temperatures in both
samples. A detailed analysis of the dielectric properties of hybrid
Pcs with gallium and indium metals was performed for the first
time in the scope of this work. These metal embedded Pcs can be
utilized as building blocks in a variety of semiconductor based
new applications, such as solar cells and OLEDs. Our results can
be exploited in the design of these new devices, which could be
of critical importance in electronics.
References
[
1] D. Dini, M. Hanack, in: K.M. Kadish, K.M. Smith, R. Guilard (Eds.), The
Porphyrin Handbook: Physical Properties of Phthalocyanine-based Materials,
vol. 17, Academic Press, USA, 2003, p. 22.
Fig. 5. Arrhenius plots of the AC conductivity for the (a) ClGaPc and (b) ClInPc
samples at different frequencies.
[
[
2] J. Simon, P. Bassoul, Design of Molecular Materials: Supramolecular
Engineering, VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
3] M.J. Cook, N.B. McKeown, J.M. Simmons, A.J. Thomson, M.F. Daniel, K.J.
Harrison, R.M. Richardson, S.J. Roser, J. Mater. Chem. 1 (1991) 121.
4] D. Schlettwein, D. Wöhrle, N.I. Jaeger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 2882.
5] J. Simon, C. Sirlin, Pure Appl. Chem. 61 (1989) 1625.
[
[
[
vation energy declines with the increasing frequency in region II,
suggesting that electronic charge transport is the dominant compo-
nent in the conductivity at lower temperatures. As the samples
reach the transition temperatures, the ionic conductivity is
activated through the dissociation of the metallic cations from their
host molecules (region I). Cationic species start to flow in the chan-
nels formed by the stacking of MPc molecules. The ionic component
contribution enhances the increase rate of conductivity in region I
along with the further enhanced electronic transport at higher tem-
peratures. There is a decline in the increase rate of the ClInPc sam-
ple conductivity at lower frequencies associated with the higher
dielectric loss, as shown in Fig. 3, for those frequencies at higher
temperatures. A second effect that is more general to both samples
at all frequencies in this region is the increase in the activation
energy with the increasing frequency. This effect is attributed to
the slower response of the ionic conductivity mechanism to the
higher frequency fields at temperatures closer to the transition
point. A quantitative analysis may provide specific information
about the contributions of ionic and electronic components to the
conductivity at varying temperatures and frequencies by using Ny-
quist diagrams and by defining appropriate equivalent circuits [17].
However, such analysis is beyond the scope of this paper and will
not be presented here.
6] J.E. van Lier, in: D. Kessel (Ed.), Photodynamic Therapy of Neoplastic Diseases,
vol. 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1990.
[7] Y. Chen, M. Hanack, Y. Araki, O. Ito, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34 (2005) 517.
[
8] H. Bartagnolli, W.J. Blau, Y. Chen, D. Dini, S.M. O’Flaherty, M. Hanack, V.
Kishnan, J. Mater. Chem. 15 (2005) 683.
9] M. Hanack, T. Schneider, M. Barthel, J.S. Shirk, S.R. Flom, R.G.S. Pong, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 219 (2001) 235.
[
[
[
[
10] D. Dini, M. Barthel, M. Hanack, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2000) 3759.
11] M. Calvete, G.Y. Yang, M. Hanack, Synth. Met. 141 (2004) 231.
12] M. Okutan, F. Yakuphanoglu, S.E. San, O. Koysal, Phys. B-Condens. Matter 368
(2005) 308.
[
[
13] M. Okutan, Y. Yerli, S.E. San, F. Yilmaz, O. Gunaydin, M. Durak, Synth. Met. 157
(
2007) 368.
14] S.E. San, Y. Yerli, M. Okutan, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Solid State Mater. Adv.
Technol. 138 (3) (2007) 284–288.
15] J.P. Linsky, T.R. Paul, R.S. Nohr, M.E. Kenney, Inorg. Chem. 19 (1980) 3131.
16] S. Senthilarasu, R. Sathyamoorthy, J.A. Ascencio, Soo-Hyoung Lee, Y.B. Hahn, J.
Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 034111.
[17] N. Munichandraiah, K. Sakthivel, L.G. Scanlon, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8
2005) E45.
18] S.R. Elliott, Adv. Phys. 36 (1987) 135.
19] K. Flatz, M. Grobosch, M. Knupfer, Appl. Phys. A 90 (2008) 243.
[20] K. Flatz, M. Grobosch, M. Knupfer, Appl. Phys. A 94 (2009) 179.
[21] D. Kolacyak, H. Peisert, T. Chassé, Appl. Phys. A 95 (2009) 173.
22] T. Marchis, P. Avetta, A. Bianco-Prevot, D. Fabbri, G. Viscardi, E. Laurenti, J.
Inorg. Biochem. 105 (2) (2011) 321.
[
[
(
[
[
[
[
23] M.N. Yara sß ir, M. Kandaz, A. Koca, Inorg. Chim. Acta 365 (1) (2011) 256.
[24] A.B. Sorokin, E.V. Kudrik, Catal. Today 159 (1) (2011) 37.