diastereoselectivity in this ADZ reaction (Scheme 3). Thus,
although there is a paucity of empirical data concerning
transition-state preferences in the reaction of imines with
Scheme 3. Mechanistic Possibilities in ADZ Reaction of
C-3-Substituted N-Dpp Imines
4
enolates, we suggest a closed transition state along Zim-
5
merman-Traxler guidelines. Since the aziridine C2 is
indubitably of (S)-absolute configuration, the reaction must
6
involve attack of the si-face of the Z-enolate upon the imine.
Where there is no imine C-3 substituent, we suggest a
pseudoequatorial positioning of the imine C-1 substituent
(
i.e., an E-configured imine) and attack upon the si-face.
When there is C-3-substitution, we postulate a repulsive
interaction between this group and the Br atom of the chiral
sultam enolate, leading to a preference for a transition state
in which the imine substituent adopts a pseudoaxial locus
7
(
a Z-imine ), leading to re-face attack. This arrangement leads
inevitably to a (2′S,3′R)- trans-aziridine, as shown in Scheme
. One may rationalize the lower selectivity shown for trans-
3
aziridine in the reaction of 2-methylbenzaldimine (whose C-3
substituent should engender at least as much steric demand
8
as a bromo substituent [which leads to an exclusively trans-
1
3
as a very pale yellow solid. From H NMR, the mixture was adjudged to
be approximately a 20:80 mixture of cis:trans isomers. After flash
chromatography (light petroleum ether:ethyl acetate (1:9)) cis-3 was obtained
20
as a colorless solid (81 mg, 0.13 mmol, 13%); Rf 0.63 (EtOAc); [R] D )
-
1
+
28.7 (c ) 1, CH2Cl2); νmax(CCl4)/cm 3057, 2964, 1703, 1440, 1341,
128, 1266, 1169, 745, 705, 644; δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 0.78-0.83 (6H,
m), 1.12-1.20 and 1.72-1.97 (7H, m), 3.22 and 3.30 (2H, 2 × d, J )
3.9 Hz), 3.57-3.60 (1H, m), 4.11-4.50 (2H, 2 × dd, J ) 6.1 Hz, 15.9
1
1
Hz), 7.10-7.57 and 7.85-8.03 (14H, m); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 19.72,
2
4
1
1
0.55, 26.29, 32.49, 38.12, 40.69, 42.31 (2 × CH, J ) 5.6 Hz), 44.56,
7.70, 48.95, 52.46, 64.58, 126.01, 128.44, 128.57, 128.68, 129.07, 129.18,
29.58, 130.62, 130.82, 131.55, 131.68, 131.74, 131.77, 131.83, 131.94,
+
32.10, 132.27, 134.61, 163.74; m/z (CI) 595 ([MH] , 66), 531 (60), 419
100), 313 (43), 201 (91), 77 (32) (found: [MH] , 595.1594, C31H33ClN2O4-
PS requires [MH] , 595.1588). Similarly, trans-3 was obtained as a colorless
+
(
+
2
0
solid (325 mg, 0.55 mmol, 55%); Rf 0.56 (EtOAc); [R] D ) +59.4 (c )
-
1
1
1
1
, CH2Cl2); νmax(CCl4)/cm 3056, 2985, 1705, 1440, 1338, 1168, 1266,
126, 738, 706, 623 (Ar); δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 0.75 (3H, s), 0.80 (3H, s),
.01-1.29 and 1.65-1.89 (7H, m), 3.23 (1H, d, J ) 13.6 Hz), 3.28 (1H,
d, J ) 13.6 Hz), 3.72 (1H, m), 4.16 (1H, dd, J ) 2.8 Hz, 13.3 Hz), 4.30
(
7
3
1H, dd, J ) 2.8 Hz, 13.3 Hz), 7.03-7.10 and 7.19-7.34 (10H, m), 7.63-
.67 and 7.79-7.83 (4H, m); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 19.65, 20.64, 26.29,
2.52, 37.75, 41.27 (aziridine CH, d, J ) 5.5 Hz), 43.96 (aziridine CH, d,
J ) 5.5 Hz), 44.37, 47.59, 48.76, 52.71, 65.11, 126.52, 127.95, 128.08,
configured aziridine]) by supposing that a Br-Br repulsion
(involving lone-pair:lone-pair interaction) is greater than a
Br-CH repulsion (involving a lone-pair:bonding-electron
repulsion). The precise details of the mechanism responsible
for these phenomena are at present under investigation in
our laboratory.
1
1
1
28.12, 128.24, 128.41, 128.94, 129.41, 131.19, 131.55, 131.65, 132.45,
+
33.00, 134.32, 135.49, 164.92 (CO, d, J ) 5.6 Hz); m/z (CI) 594 ([M] ,
9), 559 (49), 219 (68), 201 (100), 77 (27) (found: [M] , 594.1559, C31H32-
+
+
ClN2O4PS requires [M] , 594.1508).
(
4) Asymmetric aza-Darzens and Darzens-like reactions: Gennari, C.;
Pain, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3747. Fujisawa, T.; Hayakawa, R.;
Shimizu, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7903. Davis, F. A.; Zhou P.; Reddy,
G. V. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3243. Davis, F. A.; Zhou, P.; Liang, C. H.;
Reddy, R. E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1511. Florio, S.; Troisi L.;
Capriati, V. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2279.
Acknowledgment. We acknowledge the financial support
of the EPSRC (studenthship to A.B.McL.). J.B.S. thanks
ZENECA for an award from the Strategic Research Fund
and Mr. Glen Buchman for valuable advice.
(
5) Zimmerman, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 1920.
(6) Calculations (UFF, Rapper, A. K.; Casewit, C. J.; Colwell, K. S.;
Goddard, W. A., III; Skiff, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10024)
show the Z-enolate to be more stable than the E-enolate by 4.1 kcal/mol.
3
(7) Although all imines used were of (E)-configuration ( JP-H ) 32 Hz)
in the pure state, (E)-(Z)-isomerism of imines under the influence of metal
ions is well-known; see, for example: Alshalaan, A. M.; Alshowiman, S.
S.; Alnajjar, I. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1986, 121, 127-129. For a discussion
of the factors underlying (E)/(Z)-preferences in imines, see: Bjørgo, J.;
Boyd, D. R.; Watson, C. G.; Jennings, W. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
OL990874U
(8) Streitwieser, A.; Heathcock, C. H.; Kosower, E. M. Introduction to
Organic Chemistry; Macmillian Publishing Company: New York, 1992.
1
1974, 757.
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 9, 1999
1341