Journal of Natural Products
Article
and 29.8), an isovaleryl ester moiety [δC 173.3, 44.3, 26.8, and
22.8 (×2)], a glucopyranosyl unit (δC 101.5, 78.1, 76.2, 75.3,
71.8, and 62.8), and a trans-coumaroyl group [δC 168.4, 161.4,
HMQC, and HMBC experiments (Figure 1) and was assigned
as 1-(2-methylbutyroyl)-8-hydroxy-2″-O-trans-p-coumaroyl-
dihydropenstemide.
1
146.9, 131.3 (×2), 127.2, 117.0 (×2), 115.0]. The H and 13C
Compound 4 (sambucuside D) was isolated as a yellowish
gum, and its molecular formula was established as C32H42O14
on the basis of its 13C NMR data and the molecular ion peak
[M − H]− at m/z 649.2491 (calcd for C32H41O14, 649.2491) in
NMR spectra of 1 were similar to those of viburtinoside II,13
except for the presence of a methylene [δH 1.63 (1H, m) and
1.52 (1H, m)] at C-7 with the absence of an oxymethine
carbon (δC 78.9) and an acetyl group (δH 2.01). This was
1
the HRFABMS. The H and 13C NMR data of 4 were quite
1
supported by the H−1H COSY cross-peak between CH2-7/
similar to those of 1, except for the presence of an additional
acetyl group [δC 172.9, 20.9; δH 2.01 (3H, s)]. In the HMBC
spectrum, a correlation from H-10 [δH 3.97 (1H, d, J = 11.0
Hz) and 3.85 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz)] to an acetyl carbonyl
carbon (δC 172.9) was used to assign the additional acetyl
group at C-10 (Figure 1). The relative configuration of 4 was
established as being the same as that of 1 based on the coupling
constant between H-1 and H-9 (5.7 Hz for 4; 5.0 Hz for 1) and
the NOESY cross-peaks of H-5/H-9 and H-10, H-9/H-10, and
H-10/H-3′ of 4 (Figure 2). Thus, the structure of 4 was
established as 1-(2-methylbutyroyl)-8-hydroxy-10-acetyl-2″-O-
trans-p-coumaroyldihydropenstemide.
CH2-6. The 3-methylbutyroyl group was located at C-1 based
on the HMBC correlation from H-1 [δH 6.10 (1H, d, J = 5.0
Hz)] to C-1′ (δC 173.3). The location of the glucose unit was
determined to be at C-11 by analysis of the HMBC data
showing a correlation from H-11 to C-1″. The HMBC cross-
peak from H-2″ [δH 4.87 (1H, overlap)] to C-1‴ (δC 168.4)
also indicated a coumaroyl group to be present at C-2″ of the
glucose unit. The planar structure of 1 was confirmed from the
1H−1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra (Figure 1). The
relative configuration of 1 was established by analyzing the
NOESY and 13C NMR data. In the NOESY spectrum (Figure
2), correlations of H-5/H-9 and H-10 and of H-9/H-10
indicated that H-5, H-9, and CH2-10 are all β-oriented.
Through the chemical shift of C-9 (δC 46.0) and the
hydroxymethyl group located at C-8, it was determined to
have a β-configuration.14 Acid hydrolysis of 1 afforded glucose
Compound 5 (sambucuside E) was obtained as a yellowish
gum, and its molecular formula was established as C32H42O14
using HRESIMS, which showed a positive-ion peak [M + Na]+
1
at m/z 673.2470 (calcd for C32H42O14Na 673.2472). The H
and 13C NMR data of 5 were similar to those of 4, except that a
trans-coumaroyl moiety of 4 was replaced with a cis-coumaroyl
moiety in 5. This was supported by the cis-coupling constant
(12.9 Hz) for H-7‴ and H-8‴ of 5. The structure of 5 was
confirmed from the 1H−1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC
spectra obtained (Figure 1), as 1-(2-methylbutyroyl)-8-
hydroxy-10-acetyl-2″-O-cis-p-coumaroyldihydropenstemide.
Compound 6 was obtained as a colorless gum, and its
molecular formula was determined to be C21H34O12 based on
1
and trans-p-coumaric acid. The H NMR data of a trans-p-
coumaric acid unit corresponded to previously reported data.15
D-Glucose was identified by TLC comparison and GC analysis
after derivatization with an authentic sample.16 The anomeric
configuration of D-glucose was determined to be β based on the
J value (8.0 Hz) of the anomeric proton in D-glucose.17 Thus,
the structure of 1 was established as 8-hydroxy-2″-O-trans-p-
coumaroyldihydropenstemide, and it was named sambucuside
A.
1
the negative-ion HRFABMS and 13C NMR data. The H and
13C NMR spectra of 6 were similar to those of supensolide F,20
except for signals assigned to the sugar unit [δC 101.5 (C-1″),
72.5 (C-2″), 73.1 (C-3″), 75.5 (C-4″), 69.1 (C-5″), and 63.4
(C-6″) for 6; δC 103.6 (C-1″), 75.3. (C-2″), 78.2 (C-3″), 71.8
(C-4″), 78.0 (C-5″), and 62.9 (C-6″) for supensolide F]. This
indicated that 6 has a galactopyranose moiety instead of a
glucopyranose moiety as in supensolide F. The HMBC
correlation from H-1″ [δH 4.68 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz)] to C-11
(δC 69.9) showed that the galactopyranose unit was located at
C-11. Acid hydrolysis of 6 afforded D-galactose, which was
confirmed by co-TLC with an authentic sample and GC
analysis.16 The relative configuration of 6 was confirmed by the
NOESY spectrum, in which correlations between CH2-10/H-5
and H-9 and H-9/H-5 suggested that H-10, H-9, and H-5 are
all β-oriented. The orientation of H-7 could be expected to be
α-oriented, based on the correlation between H-7/H-1. Thus,
the structure of 6 (sambucuside F) was established as 7β,8β-
dihydroxydihydropenstemide.
Compound 2 was obtained as a yellowish gum. The
molecular formula of 2 was established as being C30H40O13
from the HRFABMS. It showed a negative ion [M − H]− at m/
1
z 607.2385 (calcd for C30H39O13 607.2385). The H and 13C
NMR data of 2 were very similar to those of 1, except for the
chemical shifts of H-7‴ and H-8‴ (δH 6.89 and 5.82 for 2; δH
7.67 and 6.38 for 1). Their relatively small J values (12.9 Hz for
2; 16.0 Hz for 1) indicated that the p-coumaroyl moiety is in
the cis-form.18 The structure of 2 was confirmed using the
1H−1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC data (Figure 1). D-
Glucopyranose was identified in a similar manner to that
described for 1. The structure of 2 (sambucuside B) was
established as 8-hydroxy-2″-O-cis-p-coumaroyl-
dihydropenstemide.
Compound 3 was obtained as a yellowish gum. Its molecular
formula was determined as C30H40O13 from the molecular ion
peak [M + Na]+ at m/z 631.2368 (calcd for C30H40O13Na,
1
631.2367) in the positive-ion HRESIMS. The H and 13C
The two known compounds were identified as 8-methoxy-
10-methylene-2,9-dioxatricyclo(4,3,1,03,7)decane (7)21 and 4-
hydroxy-8-methoxy-10-methylene-2,9-dioxatricyclo(4,3,1,03,7)-
decane (8)22 by comparison with NMR data in the literature.
The cytotoxic activities of compounds 1−8 against the A549
(non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma), SK-OV-3 (ovary malig-
nant ascites), SK-MEL-2 (skin melanoma), and Bt549 (invasive
ductal carcinoma) cell lines were evaluated using an SRB
bioassay. Compounds 2, 3, and 5 showed cytotoxic activities
against SK-MEL-2 and Bt549 of the human cancer cell lines
tested, with IC50 values ranging from 1.3 to 8.7 μM (Table 3).
NMR data of 3 were quite similar to those of 1, except for the
presence of the 2-methylbutyroyl group, rather than a 3-
methylbutyroyl group at C-1 [δH 2.38 (1H, m, H-2′), 1.64 (1H,
overlap, H-3′a), 1.49 (1H, overlap, H-3′b), 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.5
Hz, H-4′), and 1.13 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), δC 176.9 (C-1′), 42.3
(C-2′), 27.9 (C-3′), 11.9 (C-4′), and 16.8 (C-5′) for 3; δH 2.21
(1H, dd, J = 7.1, 1.9 Hz, H-2′), 2.06 (1H, m, H-3), and 0.96
(6H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, H-4′, 5′), δC 173.3 (C-1′), 44.3 (C-2′), 26.8
(C-3′), and 22.8 (C-4′,5′) for 1].19 This was supported by the
HMBC cross-peaks of H-5′/C-1′, C-2′, and C-3′. The structure
1
of 3 (sambucuside C) was confirmed using H−1H COSY,
C
J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX