analyzed with the method proposed. From the results given in
Table S2w, we can see that the precision and recovery of our
method for determining GSH in cell extracts are satisfactory.
In conclusion, we provide a dicopper complex CL probe for
the determination of GSH and related cellular thiols for the
first time. GSH was able to form complexes with copper (II)
derived from probe Cu2L2. This competitive complexation
with copper (II) may lead to the destruction of the
peroxidase-like dicopper complex Cu2L2, then decreases in
CL intensity were observed accordingly. The relatively low
detection limit of 1.8 nM and a broad dynamic range of
8.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ9B2.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ7 M were achieved. The developed
CL assay based on CL probe Cu2L2 was considerably
attractive for rapid, sensitive and selective detection of cellular
thiols. The novel strategy provides an alternative method for
molecule recognition using CL probe.
Fig. 5 CL responses of luminol–H2O2 catalyzed by probe Cu2L2,
after which was reacted with the supernatant of murine P388 lympho-
cytic leukemia cells (A) and with the protein extracts of murine P388
lymphocytic leukemia cells (B). The other conditions were the same as
Fig. 2.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No.20775038), Doctoral Fund of
Ministry of Education of China (No. 200804260001), and
the Excellent Young Scientists Foundation of Shandong
Province (JQ200805).
2-mercaptoethanol (b-ME) and Cys. The results are in good
agreement with the results reported previously.7a,8
Two protein thiols of metallothionein (MT) and glutathione
reductase (GR) were further testified with the CL method.
When 2.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ6 M probe Cu2L2 was used, the DICL increases
when the concentration of MT (Fig. S10Aw) ranges from
1.0 nM to 80 nM and GR (Fig. S10Bw) from 10.0 mU Lꢁ1
to 1500 mU Lꢁ1, respectively, and reached a plateau since
then. It was noteworthy that the probe Cu2L2 could still
achieve sensitive detection even at 1.0 nM MT, this indicated
that the probe Cu2L2 is more sensitive to protein thiols than
free thiols.
Notes and references
¨
1 B. Rojkovich, E. Nagy, T. .Prohle, G. Poor and P. Gergely,
Clin. Diag. Lab. Immunol., 1999, 6, 683–685.
2 R. J. Singh, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 2002, 140, 380–381.
3 M. McDonagh, L. Ali, A. Kahn, P. R. Flau, Y. A. Barnett and
C. R. Barnett, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 1997, 25, 146–151.
4 G. S. Devi, M. H. Prasad, I. Saraswathi, D. Ranghu, D. N. Rao
and P. P. Reddy, Clin. Chim. Acta, 2000, 293, 53–62.
5 N. Saydam, A. Kirb and O. Demir, Cancer Lett., 1997, 119, 13–19.
´
6 K. Kusmierek, R. G"owacki and E. Bald, Anal. Bioanal. Chem.,
2006, 385, 855–860.
7 (a) B. Tang, Y. L. Xing, P. Li, N. Zhang, F. B. Yu and
G. W. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11666–11667;
(b) M. M. Pires and J. Chmielewski, Org. Lett., 2008, 10,
837–840; (c) R. Hong, H. Gang, J. M. Fernndez, B.-J. Kim,
N. S. Forbes and V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128,
1078–1079.
In order to evaluate the applicability of the proposed
method in clinical diagnosis, CL determination of free thiols
and protein thiols in the extracts of murine P388 lymphocytic
leukemia cells was performed, respectively. The experimental
details were described in the ESI and results were shown in
Fig. 5.w From the results we can see that probe Cu2L2 showed
much higher reactive responses toward protein thiols in the
protein extracts of murine P388 lymphocytic leukemia cells
than those of free thiols in the supernatant. This may caused
by the large amount of sulfhydryl groups that exist with
protein thiols.
8 W. Wang, L. Li, S. F. Liu, C. P. Ma and S. S. Zhang, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 10846–10847.
9 H. Jiang and H. X. Ju, Anal. Chem., 2007, 79, 6690–6696.
10 O. W. Griffith, Anal. Biochem., 1980, 106, 207–212.
11 (a) H. Y. Han, Z. K. He and Y. E. Zeng, Microchim. Acta, 2006,
155, 431–434; (b) A. A. Ensafi, T. Khayamian and F. Hasanpour,
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2008, 48, 140–144; (c) S. J. Wang,
H. M. Ma, J. Li, X. Q. Chen, Z. J. Bao and S. N. Sun, Talanta,
2006, 70, 518–521.
12 T. Uzu and S. Sasaki, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 4383–4386.
13 (a) B. Tang, F. Liu, K. H. Xu and L. L. Tong, FEBS J., 2008, 275,
1510–1517; (b) M. Hultberg, A. Isaksson, A. Andersson and
B. Hultberg, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 2007, 167, 56–62;
(c) S. L. Tobey and E. V. Anslyn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
14807–14815.
The total concentration of thiols in cell extracts was counted
by GSH and the GSH content of the cell extracts was derived
from the standard curve and the regression equation.
Compared with electrochemical method developed by our
group,8 the results using our present approach were in good
agreement with those obtained using electrochemical method
(experimental details, see ESIw). The average recovery test was
made using the standard addition method. All the cell extracts
were spiked with GSH at different concentration levels and then
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
5626 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 5624–5626