2072
R. TAKEI et al.
24 h and then treated with MeOH (1 ml). After removing
the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by HPLC
(Inertsil ODS, 20 ꢂ 250 mm; MeOH:H2O = 80:20, v/v,
5 ml/min, A280 nm) to give the dibenzoate of 1 (1a;
3.1 mg, 89%). 1a: EI-MS m=z (rel. int., %): 350[M]þ (2),
229 (6), 228 (20), 105 (100), 77 (22); UV (MeOH) ꢃmax
nm ("): 232 (21700); 1H-NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3) ꢀ
(ppm): 7.98 (4H, m), 7.52 (2H, m), 7.40 (4H, m), 6.70
(1H, m), 6.04 (1H, m), 5.71 (1H, ddd, J ¼ 10:4, 7.8,
4.8 Hz), 3.17 (1H, dd, J ¼ 16:5, 4.8 Hz), 2.75 (1H, dd,
J ¼ 16:5, 10.4 Hz), 1.88 (3H, m).
m, H-2), 5.15 (1H, m, H-3), 4.16 (1H, br d, J ¼ 8:9 Hz,
H-6), 3.38 (1H, m, H-5), 3.30 (1H, m, H-4), 1.81 (3H, m,
H-7), 1.45 [9H, s, C(CH3)3]. Compound 3b: FD-MS
1
m=z, 242 [M]þ; H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) ꢀ (ppm):
5.64 (1H, m, H-2), 5.05 (1H, m, H-6), 4.35 (1H, m, H-3),
3.33 (2H, m, H-4, 5), 1.72 (3H, m, H-7), 1.46 [9H, s,
C(CH3)3].
In vitro conversion of 3 into 2 and 4. Frozen mycelia
of L. theobrome (1.83 g) were ground in liquid nitrogen
and suspended in 20 ml of a 100 mM phosphate buffer
(pH 6.4, 1 mM DTT). After centrifuging the suspension
(13;000 ꢂ g), the resulting supernatant was used for a
cell-free experiment. In vitro conversion was carried
out in a final volume of 6 ml containing the 100 mM
phosphate buffer (pH 6.4), 1 mM theobroxide, and 1 mM
Na2CO3 with or without 1 ml of the cell-free extract.
The reaction mixture was incubated at 25 ꢁC. Seven days
after starting the reaction, the reaction mixture (6 ml)
was extracted with the same volume of EtOAc and then
evaporated. The residue was dissolved in a small amount
of MeOH and subjected to HPLC (Inertsil ODS, 20 ꢂ
250 mm, MeOH:H2O = 10:90, 5 ml/min, A210 nm). The
retention times of the products in this experiment and
of authentic samples were same (2, retention time,
7.5 min: 4, retention time, 7.0 min). The molecular
ion peaks of both products (m=z 186) were observed
by EI-MS.
Preparation of the dimethylaminobenzoyl derivative
(2a). Compound 2 (1 mg, 0.005 mmol) and 4-(dimethyl-
amino)benzoyl chloride (19.9 mg, 0.11 mmol) were
dissolved in pyridine (1 ml). The reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 24 h and then treated
with MeOH (1 ml). After removing the solvent in vacuo,
the residue was purified by HPLC (Inertsil ODS,
20 ꢂ 250 mm; CH3CN:H2O = 70:30, v/v, 5 ml/min,
A280 nm) to give the dibenzoate of 2 (2a; 0.6 mg, 25%).
2a: EI-MS m=z (rel. int., %): 480[M]þ (8), 316 (29), 164
(51), 148 (100), 120 (11); UV (MeOH) ꢃmax nm ("): 316
(37200); 1H-NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3) ꢀ (ppm): 7.83
(4H, m), 6.61 (4H, m), 5.91 (1H, m), 5.68 (1H, dd,
J ¼ 7:3, 7.3 Hz), 5.62 (1H, m), 5.07 (1H, m), 4.98
(1H, dd, J ¼ 7:3, 7.3 Hz), 3.00 (6H, m), 2.99 (6H, m),
1.97 (3H, m).
Chemical conversion of theobroxide (3) into 2 and 4.
Theobroxide
Bioassay. The potato micro-tuber-inducing activity
was assayed by cultures of single–node segments of the
potato stem in vitro as previously described.9)
3 (100 mg, 0.7 mmol) and (Boc)2O
(152.6 mg, 0.7 mmol) were dissolved in CH3CN
(5 ml).7) DMAP (7 mg) was added, and the reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After
removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified
by silica gel column chromatography (Kanto Chemical,
silica gel 60N, 20 g; MeOH:CHCl3 = 3:97, v/v) and
HPLC (Inertsil ODS, 20 ꢂ 250 mm; CH3CN:H2O =
30:70, v/v, 8 ml/min, A210 nm) to give 3a (30.0 mg,
0.12 mmol, 18%; retention time, 63.4 min) and 3b
(64.6 mg, 0.27 mmol, 38%; retention time, 65.7 min).
Compound 3a (25.2 mg, 0.10 mmol) and BF3-OEt2/
CH2Cl2 (0.2 mM, 0.5 ml, 0.10 mmol) were dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (3 ml).8) The reaction mixture was stirred at
ꢀ40 ꢁC for 30 min. The reaction solution was poured
into saturated NaHCO3 aq. (6 ml) and successfully
extracted with CH2Cl2 and EtOAc (6 ml ꢂ 3). Each
extract was washed with saturated brine (5 ml ꢂ 1) and
dried over Na2SO4. The EtOAc extract was evaporated
and the resulting residue (5.7 mg) was purified by HPLC
(Inertsil ODS, 20 ꢂ 250 mm; MeOH:H2O = 10:90, v/v,
5 ml/min, A210 nm) to give compound 2 (5.3 mg, 0.03
mmol, 28%). Compound 4 was converted from 3 in the
same manner above (yield, 25%). The specific rotation
Acknowledgments
We thank to Dr. E. Fukushi and Mr. K. Watanabe for
measuring the mass spectral data.
References
1) Aldridge, D. C., Galt, S., Giles, D., and Turner, W. B.,
Metabolites of Lasiodiplodia theobromae. J. Chem. Soc.
(C), 1623–1627 (1971).
2) Nakamori, K., Matsuura, H., Yoshihara, T., Ichihara, A.,
and Koda, Y., Potato micro-tuber inducing substances
from Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Phytochemistry, 45,
835–839 (1994).
3) Yoshihara, T., Ohmori, F., Nakamori, K., Amanuma, M.,
Tsutsumi, T., Ichihara, A., and Matsuura, H., Induction
of plant tubers and flower buds under noninducing
photoperiod condition by a natural product, theobroxide.
J. Plant Growth Regul., 19, 457–461 (2000).
4) Matsuura, H., Obara, N., Chisaka, N., Ichihara, A., and
Yoshihara, T., Novel cyclohexene compound from
Lasiodiplodia theobromae IFO 31059. Biosci. Biotech-
nol. Biochem., 62, 2460–2462 (1998).
1
values, EI-MS and H-NMR spectral data for 2 and 4
were identical with those of both compounds isolated
5) Peng, L., Takei, R., Takahashi, K., and Nabeta, K.,
Biosynthesis of theobroxide and its related compounds,
metabolites of Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Phytochemis-
try, 68, 819–823 (2007).
from L. theobromae.4) Compound 3a: FD-MS m=z, 242
1
[M]þ; H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) ꢀ (ppm): 5.41 (1H,