268
E. Kyslíková et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 67 (2010) 266–270
Table 1
15 mL of the culture medium. The cultures of bacteria and yeasts
were grown in LB medium (1.0% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1.0%
sodium chloride, pH 7.0) and YPD medium (1.0% yeast extract, 1.0%
peptone, 1.0% glucose, pH 5.5), respectively. The value of pH in a
medium was adjusted before sterilization. One vial of the frozen
stock culture of each strain was used as inoculum and cultures
were performed on an orbital shaker (200 rpm) for 48 h and at
28 ◦C. In the course of a cultivation or microbial reduction, pH was
not controlled. To prepare the cell suspensions for biotransforma-
tions, a biomass was harvested from the cultures by centrifugation
(10 000 × g, 15 min, 10 ◦C), washed with 50 mM potassium phos-
phate buffer (pH 7.0, buffer A), frozen overnight at −20 ◦C, and used
for the reduction of 1 after resuspending in a required volume of
the buffer A.
Screening for microorganisms capable of the diastereoselective
reduction of the ketone 1 was performed as follows: the volume
of 5 mL of 10% suspension of cells (cell wet weight/v) in buffer A
was added into 25 mL Erlen-Mayer flasks. The reactions were per-
formed at 200 rpm, 28 ◦C and initiated by the addition of 0.1 mL
of solution of 1 in ethanol (25 mg/mL) so that the final concentra-
tion of 1 equaled 0.5 g/L. After 24 h, a sample of the reaction mixture
(0.5 mL) was removed and extracted for 15 min with 0.5 mL of ethy-
lacetate. The sample was centrifuged (10 000 × g, 5 min) and the
organic layer was used for the detection of 1 and 2 by TLC.
Asymmetric microbial reduction of ketone 1 to Ezetimibe 2.
Microorganism
Yield (%)
de of 2 (%)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae No. 3
Saccharomyces cerevisiae No. 4
Saccharomyces cerevisiae No. 13
Torulopsis azyma CCY 26592
Candida tropicalis RIFIS 216
Rhodococcus sp. No.654
8.6
8.4
4.8
4.3
4.7
99.9
99.8
95.8
n.d.
n.d.
99.2
99.9
24.3
41.5
Rhodococcus fascians MO22
Yield is expressed as a percentage (w/w) of the ketone converted to Ezetimibe, n.d.:
not determined.
mate at concentrations 10, 50 and 100 g/L. 10% (cell wet weight/v)
suspension of cells was used in these experiments. The following
parameters optimized in this work were used in the conversion
of 30 ◦C.
3. Results and discussion
A number of yeasts and bacteria [15–18] were reported as
ketoreductase positive microorganisms. To detect the useful bio-
catalyst for the production of Ezetimibe 2 with high conversion and
de, a number of microorganisms have to be analyzed. As a total, we
screened 230 microbial strains for the asymmetric reduction of the
ketone 1 to alcohol 2. Among them, eight yeast and nine bacterial
strains were detected and isolated as KR positive microorganisms.
The conversion and de of the product 2 were determined by HPLC
with cell suspensions of the strains exhibiting at least a conver-
sion of 4% of the ketone into the product. The results are shown
in Table 1. The highest conversion of 41.5% and de of 99.9% were
achieved with the strain R. fascians MO22 (collection of microor-
ganisms of the Laboratory of Enzyme Technology) that was isolated
from the population of microorganisms growing in a biofilter of the
exhaust gas installed to remove pollutants the styrene and acetone.
medium R and bioconversion of the ketone 1 by culture samples
withdrawn at regular intervals from the bioreactor were conducted
to study the effect of the culture growth phase on the bioconver-
sion (Fig. 2). The culture growth was completed in 44 h when the
culture reached the stationary phase of growth. The bioconver-
sion increases in the course of the exponential phase of growth
and reaches the maximum of 45% in the 22nd h of cultivation. The
same conversion was maintained for the period of time of 22 h in
the course of which the growth rate of the culture ceased. Later
on, the fast decrease of the bioconversion was observed, but cells
2.4. Optimization of conditions for biotransformation of 1 by cells
of R. fascians MO22
2.4.1. The influence of the growth phase of a culture
The microbial strain R. fascians MO22 was grown in a 10 L stirred
bioreactor with a working volume of 8.0 L. The culture medium R
contained 0.2% yeast extract, 0.3% beef extract, 0.5% bacteriological
peptone, 0.7% tryptone, and 1.0% sodium chloride (pH 7.2).
Two-stage inoculum (F1 and F2) was prepared. Inoculum F1:
a vial of the glycerol stock culture was inoculated into 100 mL of
medium R in a 500 mL flask. The cultivation was carried out on the
orbital shaker (200 rpm) for 24 h at 28 ◦C. 5 mL of the culture F1 was
used to inoculate 100 mL of the medium R, and the inoculum F2 (2
flasks) was incubated for 34 h at 28 ◦C.
The bioreactor containing 8 L of the medium R was inoculated
with 200 mL of the F2 inoculum and the batch culture was con-
ducted under the following conditions: cultivation temperature of
28 ◦C, stirring frequency of 500 rpm, aeration rate of 10 L/min, and
cultivation time 58 h. During fermentation, the cells were harvested
periodically from 2 mL samples of the culture by centrifugation
(10 000 rpm, 15 min, 10 ◦C), washed with buffer A, and kept at
−20 ◦C. To evaluate the bioconversion ability of cells, the frozen
biomass in a vial was resuspended in 1 mL of buffer A and the reac-
tion was started by addition of the ethanol solution of ketone 1
(final concentration 0.5 g/L). The vials were shaken (200 rpm, 28 ◦C)
for 4 h and the sample of the reaction mixture was removed and
processed as described earlier. The organic layer was used for the
determination of concentrations of 1 and 2 by HPLC.
4.5
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
2.4.2. The effect of reaction pH, temperature and cofactor
regeneration
1.5
1
To find pH optimum for the bioreduction, the reaction was car-
ried out at the pH ranging from 2 to 10, using 0.1 M buffers as
follows: the citrate buffer for the pH range from 2 to 6, the phos-
phate buffer for the pH 7 and 8, and the Tris–HCl buffer for the
pH 9 and 10. The temperature optimum was determined by incu-
bation of the resting cell suspension in buffer A at temperature
ranging from 25 ◦C to 40 ◦C. To improve the efficiency of the micro-
bial reduction, the effect of routinely used substrates for cofactor
regeneration was studied: the conversion of 1 was performed in the
buffer A supplemented with glucose, glycerol, isopropanol, and for-
0.5
0
0
0
20
40
60
Fermentation time (h)
Fig. 2. The time-course of the biomass concentration (ꢀ: cell dry weight in g/L) in
a batch culture of the strain R. fascians MO22 performed in a stirred bioreactor and
the growth phase-dependent capability of the cells for diastereoselective reduction
of ketone 1 to Ezetimibe 2 (ꢁ: conversion in %).