K. Sugimoto et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4570–4572
4571
O
O
O
STol
STol
2 steps
ref. 4
MCPBA
6
CH2Cl2
93%
OAc O
OAc O
8
9
OMe
OMe
OMe
O
OMe
O
OMe
LDA
i-Bu
LDA
TESOTf
X
H
9
I
THF/HMPA
54%
THF
CH2Cl2
O
O
OTES
OTES
OTES
OAc O
OAc O
10
11
12
13: X = S(O)Tol
14
LDA, n-BuI
THF/HMPA
59%
toluene
°
90 C
OMe
O
OH
O
OMe
O
OMe
BBr3
aq. HF
2
CH3CN
81%
CH3CN
31% from 11
16%
O
OH
OH
OTES
OH
O
OAc O
16
OAc O
17
1
15
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 1 and 2.
gated cyclohexadiene 5 followed by syn-elimination of HX from the
resulting cycloadduct 3 and a subsequent retro-Diels–Alder reac-
tion of the elimination product which would release ethylene to
form the fully substituted benzene ring. The dienophile 4 in the
Diels–Alder reaction should be prepared from a commercially
available compound 6 (juglone) by regioselective installation of
an appropriate leaving group (X), while the enophile 5 would be
readily accessible from substituted cyclohexenone 7 via its alkyl-
ation followed by enol etherification.
In conclusion, the four-step syntheses of lupinacidins A and B,
featuring the Diels–Alder reaction of the suitably substituted diene
12 with the quinone dienophile 9 possessing a p-tolylsulfinyl
group as a regiochemistry-controlling auxiliary followed by the
sequential elimination of p-tolylsulfenic and ethylene, were
achieved from the readily available starting material 10 in 14%
and 9% overall yields, respectively. Synthesis of a variety of analogs
of 1 and 2 as well as their structure–activity relationship studies is
now underway.
According to the synthetic plan, a known juglone derivative 8,
prepared in two steps from 6 by acetylation and regioselective
installation of a tolylthio group,4 was oxidized with MCPBA to afford
dienophile 9. The p-toluenesulfinyl group of 9 was chosen to effect
the Diels–Alder reaction in a regioselective manner and also as a
leaving group in the following elimination step (Scheme 2).5 The
enophile (12) for the synthesis of lupinacidin A (1) was prepared
by alkylation of the known cyclohexenone derivative 10 with 1-
iodo-3-methylbutane and by subsequent TES enol etherification of
the resulting alkylation product 11.6 Due to its instability, the diene
12 was subjected in situ to the Diels–Alder reaction with 9 to give
cycloadduct 13, which spontaneously liberated p-toluenesulfenic
acid under the reaction conditions via a syn-elimination reaction,
affording tetracyclic intermediate 14 as the only detectable regio-
isomer.5d After being roughly purified by silica gel column chroma-
tography,7 14 was heated in toluene to give anthraquinone 15 with
the evolution of ethylene.5d,6 The TES group of 15 was then removed
by directly treating the reaction mixture containing 15 with a solu-
tion of aqueous hydrofluoric acid in acetonitrile to furnish 16 in a
two-pot operation and 31% overall yield from 11. Finally, the treat-
ment of 16 with BBr3 in acetonitrile and subsequent workup with
aqueous NaHCO3 brought about the deprotection of the methoxy
and acetoxy groups, giving lupinacidin A (1) (mp 235–237 °C, lit.1
mp 234–238 °C) in 81% yield. The other target molecule 2 (mp
201–203 °C, lit.1 mp 201–203 °C) was also synthesized in the same
manner as described for 1 except that the initial alkylation of 10
was conducted with 1-iodobutane instead of 1-iodo-3-methylbu-
tane. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 1 and 2 were identical with
those of natural lupinacidins A and B, respectively.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Professor Yasuhiro Igarashi (Toyama Prefec-
tural University) for providing the spectra of lupinacidins A and B.
This work was supported, in part, by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sci-
ence and Technology of Japan (No. 22380064).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, characteriza-
tion data, and NMR spectra for new compounds) associated with
this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/
References and notes
1. Igarashi, Y.; Trujillo, M. E.; Martínez-Molina, E.; Yanase, S.; Miyanaga, S.; Obata,
T.; Sakurai, H.; Saiki, I.; Fujita, T.; Furumai, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17,
3702–3705.
2. For synthetic anthraquinones with
a benzene ring unit having the same
substitution pattern, see: (a) Heller, G.; Lindner, P. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1922,
55B, 267–269; (b) Wang, J.; Pettus, L. H.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 1793–1796; (c) Rezanka, T.; Dembitsky, V. M. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20, 969–
980.
3. For examples of naturally occurring bianthraquinones having analogous
substitution patterns, see: (a) Delle Monache, F.; D’Albuquerque, I. L.; De
Andrade Chiappeta, A.; De Mello, J. F. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 259–261; (b)
Singh, V.; Singh, J.; Sharma, J. P. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2176–2177; (c) Singh,
S.; Singh, J. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 1159–1162; (d) Ref. 2c.