232
W.S. Yam, G.Y. Yeap / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 229–232
using CCDC Mercury 1.4.2 version. The observation in layer spacing reflected the conformations of molecules in
crystal and SmC phase, respectively. The molecules thus assumed to be almost fully stretched in crystal phase but are
slightly tilted in SmC phase. However, the tilt angle in SmC phase cannot be determined due to a first order transition, a
transition that involved a discontinuity in entropy, which is the first derivative of the Gibbs energy function [14,15].
In conclusion, all the target compounds exhibited stable, enantiotropic liquid crystalline nematic and smectic C
phases. The mesophases were found to be side chain dependent; compounds 4 (n = 3) and 5 (n = 5) were nematogenic
whilst compounds 6–11 (n = 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17) were smectogenic. The planarity and enhanced polarity of the oxygen
atoms of the ester and ether linkages as well as the heterocyclic central moiety may be attributed to the stability of the
mesophases.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for USM RU (No. 1001/PKIMIA/81140). Prof. Masato
M. Ito of Department of Environmental Engineering for Symbiosis, Faculty of Engineering, Soka University for
carrying out the DSC measurements and Prof. Ewa Gorecka of Dielectrics and Mechanics Department, Warsaw
University for carrying out the powder X-ray diffraction measurements and helpful discussions.
References
[1] J.W. Goodby, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 4 (1999) 361.
[2] Y.J. Wang, H.S. Sheu, C.K. Lai, Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 1695.
[3] C.T. Imrie, M.D. Ingram, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 347 (2000) 199.
[4] C.T. Imrie, P.A. Henderson, Liq. Cryst. 32 (2005) 1531.
[5] C.T. Imrie, P.A. Henderson, G.Y. Yeap, Liq. Cryst. 36 (2009) 755.
[6] T. Hirose, K. Tsuya, T. Nishigaki, et al. Liq. Cryst. 4 (1989) 653.
[7] P.B. Kaufman, J.A. Duke, H. Brielmann, et al. J. Altern. Complem. Med. 3 (1) (1997) 7.
[8] G.M. Boland, D.M.X. Donnelly, Nat. Prod. Rep. (1998) 241.
[9] N.K. Chudgar, R. Bosco, S.N. Shah, Liq. Cryst. 10 (1991) 141.
[10] N.K. Chudgar, M.K. Parekh, S.S. Madhavrao, et al. Liq. Cryst. 19 (1995) 807.
[11] Analytical and spectroscopic data for the representative compound 7: Yield 60%, anal: calcd. for C30H38O5, C 75.27, H 8.00, found, C 75.28, H
8.80%. 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 8.32 (d, 1H, J = 8.7, Ar–H), 7.97 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 8.7, Ar–H), 7.28 (d, 1H, J = 2.1, Ar–H), 7.14–7.16
(dd, 1H, J = 8.7, J = 2.1, Ar–H), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.7, Ar–H), 4.01–4.04 (t, 2H, OCH2), 2.59–2.63 (t, 2H, CH2COO), 1.81–1.89 (m, 1H,
OCH2CH2CH(CH3)CH3), 1.70–1.80 (m, 2H, CH2CH2COO), 1.62–1.69 (m, 2H, OCH2CH2CH(CH3)CH3), 1.29–1.43 (m, 10H,
(CH2)5CH2CH2COO), 0.97 (d, 6H, (OCH2CH2CH(CH3)CH3)) 0.87–0.91 (t, 3H, COOCH2CH2(CH2)6CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 176.22,
159.69, 157.06, 154.93, 152.95, 130.47, 128.21, 125.62, 123.97, 122.64, 119.85, 115.00, 111.27 (Carom), 171.90 (COO), 66.84 (OCH2), 25.45
(CH), 23.08–38.35 (CH2), 23.00, 14.52 (CH3).
[12] H. Kelker, R. Hatz, Handbook of Liquid Crystals, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1980.
[13] J. Belmar, M. Parra, C. Zuniga, et al. Liq. Cryst. 26 (1999) 75.
[14] R. Steinstrasser, L. Pohl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 12 (1973) 617.
[15] T. Geelhaar, Liq. Cryst. 24 (1998) 91.