ORGANIC
LETTERS
XXXX
Vol. XX, No. XX
000–000
Aza-Piancatelli Rearrangement Initiated
by Ring Opening of DonorÀAcceptor
Cyclopropanes
Donald R. Wenz and Javier Read de Alaniz*
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara,
California 93106-9510, United States
Received May 3, 2013
ABSTRACT
The development of a new platform to initiate the cascade rearrangement of furans for the formation of functionalized cyclopentenone building
blocks is reported. This methodology allows the creation of congested vicinal stereogenic centers with high diastereoselectivity through a
4π-electrocyclization process.
Functionalized cyclopentenones are an important struc-
tural motif frequently found in natural products and
pharmaceutical drugs.1 The 4π-electrocyclization of
pentadienyl cation intermediates represents one of the
most powerful methods available for constructing cyclo-
pentenones. The quintessential example is the Nazarov
cyclization, which relies on a divinyl ketone as the pre-
cursor to the requisite pentadienyl cation intermediate.2
Limitations associated with the dienone substitution pat-
tern in the Nazarov cyclization have inspired the search for
new approaches to access the requisite pentadienyl cation,
and progress in this area has been demonstrated in several
elegant reports.3
We were drawn to a conceptually distinct strategy to
gain access to the required pentadienyl cation intermediate
that is based on the cascade molecular rearrangement of
R-furylcarbinols (Scheme 1).4 The overall transformation is
highly diastereoselective and believed to proceed through a
cascade sequence that terminates in a 4π-electrocyclic ring
closure of a pentadienyl cation intermediate D.5
Since the pioneering work by Piancatelli et al. in 1976,
the synthesis of functionalized 4-hydroxy- and 4-amino-
cyclopentenones through a molecular rearrangement has
almost exclusively relied on R-furylcarbinols.6 The classic
Piancatelli rearrangement is initiated by activation of
(4) (a) Veits, G. K.; Wenz, D. R.; Read de Alaniz, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9484. (b) Palmer, L. I.; Read de Alaniz, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7167. (c) Palmer, L. I.; Read de Alaniz, J. Org.
Lett. 2013, 15, 476.
(5) For computational studies on the proposed mechanism, see: (a)
Faza, A. N.; Lopez, C. S.; Alvarez, R.; de Lera, I. R. Chem.;Eur. J.
2004, 10, 4324. (b) Davis, L. D.; Tantillo, D. J. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010,
14, 1561.
(6) (a) Piancatelli, G.; Scettri, A.; Barbadoro, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1976, 17, 3555. (b) Piancatelli, G.; Dauria, M.; Donofrio, F. Synthesis
1994, 867. (c) Yin, B.-L.; Wu, Y.-L.; Lai, J.-Q. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
2695. (d) Ulbrich, K.; Kreitmeier, P.; Reiser, O. Synlett 2010, 2037. (e)
Reddy, B.V. S.; Narasimhulu, G.; Lakshumma, P. S.; Reddy, Y. V.;
Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1776. (f) Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy,
Y. V.; Lakshumma, P. S.; Narasimhulu, G.; Yadav, J. S.; Sridhar, B.;
Reddy, P. P.; Kunwar, A. C. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 10661.
(1) For representative reviews, see: (a) Gibson, S. E.; Lewis, S. E.;
Mainolfi, N. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3873. (b) Kurteva, V. B.;
Afonso, C. A. M. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6809. (c) Roche, S. P.; Aitken,
D. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 5339.
(2) For reviews on the Nazarov reaction, see: (a) Frontier, A. J.;
Collison, C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7577. (b) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 6479. (c) Tius, M. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2193. (d) Grant,
T. N.; Rieder, C. J.; West, F. G. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5676. (e) Vaidya,
T.; Eisenberg, R.; Frontier, A. J. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1531.
(3) For representative examples, see: (a) Prandi, C.; Deagostino, A.;
Venturello, P.; Occhiato, E. G. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4345. (b) Grant, T. N.;
West, F. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9348. (c) Spencer, W. T.; Levin,
M. D.; Frontier, A. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 13, 414. (d) Wu, Y.-K.; West,
F. G. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5410. (e) Brooks, J. L.; Caruana, P. A.;
Frontier, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12454.
r
10.1021/ol401248p
XXXX American Chemical Society