5428
M. B. Calvert, J. Sperry / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 5426–5429
References and notes
O
O
O
O
(COCl)2
Et2O
Et3N
1. (a) Salway, A. H. J. Chem. Soc. 1911, 99, 2148; (b) Robinson, B. J. Chem. Soc. 1964,
1503; (c) Takano, S.; Ogasawara, K. Alkaloids 1989, 36, 225.
2. (a) Triggle, D. J.; Mitchell, R.; Filler, R. CNS Drug Rev. 1998, 4, 87; (b) Giacobini, E.
Neurochem. Int. 1998, 32, 413; (c) Sneader, W. Drug News Perspect. 1999, 12,
433.
OEt
Ph
Cl
Ph
EtOH
Ph
N
94%
N
N
Me
from 22
Me
Me
24
22
23
3. Greig, N. H.; Pei, X.-F.; Soncrant, T. T.; Ingram, D. K.; Brossi, A. Med. Res. Rev.
1995, 15, 3.
4. (a) Hayashi, M.; Kim, Y.-P.; Takamatsu, S.; Enomoto, A.; Shinose, M.; Takahashi,
Y.; Tanaka, H.; Komiyama, K.; Omura, S. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 1091; (b)
Takamatsu, S.; Kim, Y.-P.; Enomoto, A.; Hayashi, M.; Tanaka, H.; Komiyama, K.;
Omura, S. J. Antibiot. 1997, 50, 1069; (c) Omura, S.; Hayashi, M.; Tomoda, H.
Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1673.
5. (a) Subramaniam, G.; Hiraku, O.; Hayashi, M.; Koyano, T.; Komiyama, K.; Kam,
T.-S. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1783; (b) Subramaniam, G.; Kam, T.-S. Helv. Chim.
Acta 2008, 91, 930.
6. From oxindoles: (a) Horne, S.; Taylor, N.; Collins, S.; Rodrigo, R. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 1, 3047; (b) Matsuura, T.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6500; (c) Suarez-Castillo, O. R.; Sanchez-Zavala, M.;
Melendez-Rodriguez, M.; Castelan-Duarte, L. E.; Morales-Rios, M. S.; Joseph-
Nathan, P. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3040; (d) Itoh, T.; Ishikawa, H.; Hayashi, Y. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 3854.
BH3·DMS
THF
78%
separate
OH
NOE
H
CF3
25
-COCF3
then
OH
O
O
NaHCO3
MeOH
NaBH3CN
TFA
3
H
2
Ph
47%
Ph
N
N
from 25
Ph
Me
Me
N
( )-27
25
Me
( )-26
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)indoline [( )-27].
7. From tryptophols: (a) Sunazuka, T.; Hirose, T.; Shirahata, T.; Harigaya, Y.;
Hayashi, M.; Komiyama, K.; Ohmura, S.; Smith, A. B., III J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 2122; (b) Trost, B. M.; Quancard, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6314; (c)
Zhu, Y.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 111; An interrupted Fischer
reaction generates intermediates 2 directly from phenylhydrazines and lactols,
see: (d) Boal, B. W.; Schammel, A. W.; Garg, N. K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3458; (e)
Schammel, A. W.; Boal, B. W.; Zu, L.; Mesganaw, T.; Garg, N. K. Tetrahedron
2010, 66, 4687.
8. (a) Kulkarni, M. G.; Dhondge, A. P.; Borhade, A. S.; Gaikwad, D. D.; Chavhan, S.
W.; Shaikh, Y. B.; Nigdale, V. B.; Desai, M. P.; Birhade, D. R.; Shinde, M. P. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 3875; For examples of complementary routes that do not rely
on the classical cyclizations outlined in Scheme 1, see: (b) Liu, Y.; Xu, W.;
Wang, X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1448.
9. Outside of the context of furoindoline synthesis, the cyclization of an oxygen
nucleophile onto a carbon atom adjacent to nitrogen is typically achieved by
amine?imine oxidation and subsequent nucleophilic attack. For
representative examples, see: (a) Chen, C.-K.; Hortmann, A. G.; Marzabadi, M.
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4829; (b) He, F.; Altom, J. D.; Corey, E. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 121, 6771; (c) Moldvai, I.; Czántay, C., Jr.; Czántay, C.
Heterocycles 2001, 55, 2147.
H
3
O
I2, PhI(OAc)2
hν, cyclohexane
7 °C - r.t
OH
Ph
N
Ph
NOE
H
H
Me
( )-28a
H
45 min
2
H
N
40%
28a:28b
= 2:1
N
Me
NOE
O
Me
27
3
O
( )-
28a
N
Ph
Me
28b
( )-
Scheme 7. Successful furoindoline synthesis and key NOE interactions in ( )-28a
(ent-28a drawn for clarity purposes).19
10. (a) Paquette, L. A.; Sun, L. Q.; Friedrich, D.; Savage, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 8438; (b) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Gimisis, T.; Spada, G. P. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5,
2866; (c) Bruke, S. D.; Kort, M. E.; Strickland, S. M. S.; Organ, H. M.; Silks, L. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1503; (d) Hatakeyama, S.; Kawamura, M.; Takano, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4081.
11. (a) Sperry, J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Brimble, M. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 29. The
synthesis of spiroaminals by 1,5- or 1,6-HAT is restricted to the cyclization of
an amine nucleophile onto a cation resonance stabilized by oxygen, see:; (b)
Koag, M.; Lee, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4766. and references therein.
12. (a) Martín, A.; Pérez-Martín, I.; Quintanal, L. M.; Suárez, E. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
1785; (b) Martín, A.; Quintanal, L. M.; Suárez, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
5507; (c) Francisco, C. G.; Herrera, A. J.; Suárez, E. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7439;
(d) Francisco, C. G.; Freire, R.; Herrera, A. J.; Pérez-Martín, I.; Suárez, E. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 1959.
was confirmed based on the conclusive NOE interactions depicted
in Scheme 7. Despite ( )-28b being the minor diastereomer, the
formation of a strained trans-fused 5,5-ring system20 is notewor-
thy and speaks to the kinetic nature of this cyclization reaction.
In conclusion, we have investigated the synthesis of furoindo-
lines from 3-(2-hydroxyethyl)indolines by a remote intramolecular
free radical functionalization. It was discovered that the intramo-
lecular hydrogen abstraction was only successful when the result-
ing radical (and hence carbocation) was resonance stabilized by
nitrogen and an adjacent phenyl group. Although this appears to
limit this methodology to the synthesis of furoindolines bearing
a quaternary center at C2, the successful cyclization affords diaste-
reomeric furoindolines, one of which contains a highly strained
trans-fused 5,5-ring system. This reaction represents a rare exam-
ple of an alkoxy radical promoted hydrogen atom transfer of a pro-
ton attached to a nitrogen substituted carbon.13 The mild nature of
these cyclization conditions infers potential application in the syn-
thesis of other heterocyclic motifs (such as spiroaminals)21 and
other trans-fused 5,5-ring systems.
13. For an example of related 1,5-HAT under reductive conditions, see: Zhu, H.;
Wickenden, J. G.; Campbell, N. E.; Leung, J. C. T.; Johnson, K. M.; Sammis, G. M.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2019 (see Table 2, compound 1i).
14. Hirose, T.; Sunazuka, T.; Yamamoto, D.; Kojima, N.; Shirahata, T.; Harigaya, Y.;
¯
Kuwajima, I.; Omura, S. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6015.
15. Garden, S. J.; da Silva, R. B.; Pinto, A. C. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8399.
16. TBAF work-up was required to hydrolyze the TES–ether of 13.
17. Gribble, G. W.; Hoffman, J. H. Synthesis 1977, 859.
18. Ishikura, M.; Terashima, M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2634.
19. ( )-cis-Furoindoline (28a) and ( )-trans-furoindoline (28b)
To a solution of ( )-27 (40 mg, 160
added I2 (90 mg, 360 mol) at room temperature. Upon dissolution of iodine,
the solution was cooled to 7 °C and PhI(OAc)2 (100 mg, 320 mol) was added
lmol) in degassed cyclohexane (15 mL) was
l
l
and the reaction mixture irradiated with a desk lamp (60 W) for 45 min. The
reaction mixture was diluted with Et2O (20 mL) and saturated Na2S2O3
solution (50 mL) and the whole extracted with Et2O (3 Â 40 mL). The
combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4), filtered and concentrated in
vacuo. Purification by preparative TLC eluting with CH2Cl2–MeOH (97.5:2.5)
Acknowledgment
We thank the School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auck-
land for the award of a summer research scholarship (M.B.C.).
gave the title compounds 28a (less polar) and 28b as
a
2:1 mixture of
diastereomers.
Compound 28a, brown solid (11 mg, 44 lmol, 27%); Mp 65–68 °C; m
max/cmÀ1
3260, 3061, 2927, 1703, 1602, 1464, 1361, 1040, 1014, 786, 701; HRMS Found:
[M]+, 251.1317. [C17H17NO]+ requires 251.1305; 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-
d6): dH = 8.00 (1 H, d, J = 1.6, ArH), 7.58–7.45 (7 H, m, ArH), 7.28 (1 H, d, J = 8.5,
ArH), 3.74–3.69 (2 H, m, CH + CH of CH2), 3.64–3.61 (1 H, m, CH of CH2), 3.59 (3
H, s, NMe), 2.86 (2 H, t, J = 7.2, CHCH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6):
dC = 140.5 (C), 137.0 (C), 131.6 (3 Â CH), 130.4 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 129.2 (2 Â CH)
128.6 (CH) 112.8 (CH), 110.3 (C), 82.7 (C), 63.2 (CH2), 31.2 (NMe), 30.3 (CH),
29.2 (CH2); m/z (APCI) 251 (M+, 18%).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (1H, 13C and associated 2D NMR spectra for
compounds ( )-27, ( )-28a and ( )-28b) associated with this arti-