Table 4 X-Ray data for compounds 1ؒC6H5Me, 2ؒpy and 3ؒC6H5Me
1ؒC6H5Me
2ؒpy
3ؒC6H5Me
Empirical formula
Formula weight
C63H66Cr2N2O8Si4
1195.54
C62H59MoN3O6Si4
1150.42
C63H66N2O6Si4W
1243.39
T/K
Crystal system
Space group
220(2)
293(2)
180(2)
Triclinic
Triclinic
Triclinic
¯
¯
¯
P1
P1
P1
a/Å
b/Å
c/Å
α/Њ
13.931(7)
15.948(9)
16.469(8)
68.08(6)
111.08(5)
89.96(7)
3129(3)
2
0.477
13.655(9)
14.524(10)
16.072(12)
102.67(8)
87.75(6)
107.62(6)
2963(4)
10.333(4)
10.733(8)
14.149(7)
110.88(6)
90.08(4)
99.91(4)
1440.9(14)
2
β/Њ
γ/Њ
V/Å3
Z
2
µ/mmϪ1
0.354
2.140
Reflections collected
Independent reflections
Final R1, wR2 [I > 2σ(I)]
(all data)
9964
10403
5351
9614 [R(int) = 0.3003]
0.0716, 0.1543
0.2487, 0.2077
10401 [R(int) = 0.0000]
0.1150, 0.2584
0.2366, 0.3001
5054 [R(int) = 0.0173]
0.0638, 0.1566
0.0696, 0.1619
[W(NBut)2(NHBut)2] (0.50 g, 1.1 mmol) in toluene (25 cm3) was
added dropwise, with stirring, a solution of (Ph2SiOH)2O (0.44
g, 1.1 mmol) in toluene (25 cm3). No visible changes were
observed following the diol addition. After 18 h at room tem-
perature the solution was reduced in vacuo to yield a yellow oil.
Recrystallisation from a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution at
Ϫ20 ЊC, afforded compound 3 (0.62 g, 49%) as colourless cubes,
mp 186–188 ЊC. IR (cmϪ1): 3314w, 3047w, 2974w, 1591w,
1429m, 1274m, 1215w, 1114s, 1032m, 1005s, 989s, 883vs, 744s,
for NMR and the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service
for mass spectra.
References
1 R. Murugavel, A. Voigt, M. G. Walawalkar and H. W. Roesky,
Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2205; L. King and A. C. Sullivan, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 1999, in the press.
2 V. Lorenz, A. Fischer, K. Jacob, W. Bruser, T. Gelbrich, P. G. Jones
and F. T. Edelmann, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2217.
3 E. Samuel, J. F. Harrod, M. J. McGlinchey, C. Cabestaing and F.
Robert, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 1292; A. M. Piotrowski and E. I.
Band, Eur. Pat., 0423 872 A2, 1990.
4 D. E. Wigley, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1994, 42, 239.
5 A. A. Danopoulos, Wa-Hung Leung, G. Wilkinson, B. Hussain-
Bates and M. B. Hursthouse, Polyhedron, 1990, 9, 2625.
6 G. Schoettel, J. Kress and J. A. Osborn, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1989, 1062.
7 W. A. Nugent, Inorg. Chem., 1983, 22, 965; W. A. Nugent, R. L.
Harlow, Inorg. Chem., 1980, 19, 777.
8 M. Motevalli, D. Shah, S. A. A. Shah and A. C. Sullivan,
Polyhedron, 1996, 15, 2387.
9 N. Meijboom, C. J. Schaverien and A. G. Orpen, Organometallics,
1990, 9, 774.
10 B. Stensland and P. Kierkegaard, Acta Chem. Scand., 1970, 24,
211.
11 F. J. Feher and R. L. Blanski, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990,
1614.
12 L. M. Baker and W. L. Carrick, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 35, 774.
13 W.-H. Leung, A. A. Danopoulos, G. Wilkinson, B. Hussain-Bates
and M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1991, 2051;
H.-W. Lam, G. Wilkinson, B. Hussain-Bates and M. B. Hursthouse,
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993, 1477.
14 H.-J. Gosink, H. W. Roesky, H.-G. Schmidt, M. Noltemeyer,
E. Irmer and R. Herbst-Irmer, Organometallics, 1994, 13, 3420.
15 P. D. Lickiss, Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 1995, 42, 147.
16 W. A. Nugent, R. J. McKinney, R. V. Dasowski and F. A.
Van-Catledge, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1982, 65, L91.
17 M.-T. Chan, W. C. Fultz, W. A. Nugent, D. C. Roe and T. H. Tulip,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 251.
18 D. C. Bradley, A. J. Howes, M. B. Hursthouse and J. D. Runnacles,
Polyhedron, 1991, 10, 477.
19 H. W. Roesky, H. Plenio, K. Keller, M. Noltemeyer and G. M.
Sheldrick, Chem. Ber., 1986, 119, 3150.
20 B. J. Brisdon, M. F. Mahon and C. C. Rainford, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans., 1998, 19, 32.
1
715s, 696vs, 517s, 505s, and 472vs. NMR: H (toluene-d8, 250
MHz, 298 K), δ 0.4 (s, 9 H, NButH2), 0.6 (s, 9 H, NBut), 2.05 (s,
2 H, NButH2), 7.0–7.3 (m, m-, p-H of Ph, C7D8 solvent), 7.92
(dd, 8 H, o-H of Ph) and 8.1 (dd, 8 H, o-H of Ph); 13C (CDCl3,
62.9 MHz, 298 K), δ 30.8 (C(CH3)3 of NH2But), 31.5
(C(CH3)3 of NBut), 49.0 (C(CH3)3 of NH2But), 70.1 (C(CH3)3
of NBut), 127.7 (m-C of Ph), 129.9, 130.0 (p-C of Ph), 134.4,
134.7 (o-C of Ph), 135.8, 136.3 (ipso-C of Ph); 29Si (CDCl3, 119.2
MHz, 300 K), δ Ϫ36.9.
X-Ray crystallography
Data were collected on a CAD4 diffractometer using Mo-Kα
(λ = 0.71069 Å) radiation and corrected for absorption using
ψ scans and DIFABS21 for compound 3ؒC6H5Me (see Table 4
for details of data collection and refinement). The structures
were solved by standard heavy atom techniques (SHELXS 86)22
and refined by full-matrix least squares (on F 2, SHELXL 97).23
The phenyl groups were treated as rigid hexagons [C–C 1.395
Å, C–C–C 120Њ, with inclusion of hydrogen atoms at fixed posi-
tions C–H 0.93 Å ]. The lattice held pyridine in compound 2ؒpy
showed positional disorder which was modelled (as a rigid
hexagon) using a 60/40 two site occupation. Hydrogens were
included at fixed positions. The high residual factor for it may in
part be due to this disorder. Solutions for 3ؒC6H5Me in P1 and
¯
¯
P1 were discussed above. For the toluene molecule in the P1
four of the carbon sites including the methyl group and its 3
nearest neighbours were modelled for 2-site occupancy about
the centre of symmetry.
CCDC reference number 186/1600.
graphic files in .cif format.
21 N. Walker and D. Stuart, DIFABS, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1983,
39, 158.
22 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A, 1990, 46, 467.
23 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL 97, Program for the Refinement of
Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, 1997.
Acknowledgements
We thank EPSRC for support ROPA GR/K90425, G. Coum-
barides (Queen Mary and Westfield College) and Peter Haycock
from University of London Interdisciplinary Research Service
Paper 9/04429I
3228
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 3225–3228