S. Lavoie et al.
Phytochemistry Letters 43 (2021) 184–189
3.3. Extraction and isolation
Table 4
Pharmacological activities of 1–3.
Dried and powdered leaves from A. nudicaulis (1.1 kg) were refluxed
sequentially in DCM (3 × 5 L), and MeOH (3 × 5 L), each time for
90 min. The solutions were filtered and concentrated under vacuum
yielding two fractions (DCM, 41.4 g; MeOH, 168 g). An aliquot from the
MeOH extract (45.3 g) was suspended in 500 mL H2O and partitioned
using 3 L of EtOAc (A, 4.5 g), then 3 L of n-BuOH (B, 9.2 g). An aliquot of
the BuOH extract (8.5 g) was separated by CC using Diaion HP-20 and a
step gradient of H2O/MeOH (1:0 → 0:1) yielding five fractions (B1–B5).
Fraction B4 (3.0 g) was subjected to flash chromatography on silica gel
and eluting isocratically with CHCl3/MeOH/H2O 26:14:3 to afford five
fractions (B4.1–B4.5). Fraction B4.2 was separated on CC using silica gel
and CHCl3/MeOH/H2O 50:15:1 as eluent yielding nine fractions
(B4.2.1–B4.2.9). Fraction B4.2.4 was purified by HPLC with 40 % of
eluent B to afford pure 5 (21.7 mg). Compounds 6 (17.2 mg) and 7
(5.8 mg) were obtained after purification of fraction B4.2.5 by HPLC
using 40 % of eluent B. Fraction B4.2.6 was purified by HPLC using 40 %
of eluent B to afford compound 1 (39.3 mg). Fraction B4.2.7 was sub-
jected to HPLC purification with 40 % of eluent B yielding pure 10
(17.9 mg). Compound 8 (21.5 mg) was obtained from fraction B4.2.8
following HPLC purification with 40 % of eluent B. Fraction B4.4 was
separated by CC on silica gel using CHCl3/MeOH/H2O 48:20:3 as the
eluent yielding five fractions (B4.4.1–B4.4.5), along with pure 4
(158.2 mg) and 3 (69.9 mg). Fraction B4.4.4 was subjected to HPLC
separation with 36 % of eluent B to afford compounds 2 (25.7 mg) and 9
(21.7 mg). Fraction B4.5 was purified by HPLC using a gradient of 20 %
B → 37 %B in 30 min to afford more 4 (83.6 mg)
1
2
3
Positive
controla
Cytotoxicity IC50
A549
(μM)
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
> 160
13 ± 2
6.2 ± 0.8
6 ± 2
DLD-1
WS1
Antimicrobial IC50
(μM)
E. coli
> 160
> 160
> 160
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
> 160
> 160
> 160
0.012 ± 0.001
0.023 ± 0.005
1.1 ± 0.1
S. aureus
C. albicans
Antioxidant
ORAC (
μ
mol TE/
N.D.
N.D.
0.35 ± 0.09
93 ± 22
> 130
24 ± 3
μ
mol)
Cell based
N.D.
N.D.
0.081 ± 0.005
antioxidant
Anti-inflammatory IC50
74 ± 28
101 ± 20
(μM)
a
Positive controls were etoposide for A549, DLD-1, and WS1; gentamycin for
E. coli and S. aureus, amphotericin B for C. albicans, L-NAME for anti-
inflammatory, and quercetin for antioxidant. N.D.: not determined.
MeOH/H2O (26:14:3) solvent systems. Spots were detected by spraying
the plates with 20 % H2SO4 in MeOH, followed by heating at 110 ◦C for
10 min. Saponins content was monitored by LC–MS using an 1100 LC
unit and a G1946 VL MS instrument (Agilent Technologies). A dual ESI
and APCI ionization source ran in negative mode was used. A Kinetex
XB-C18 HPLC column (Phenomenex, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size)
was used with 1 mL/min of H2O and MeCN, both acidified with 0.1 %
HCOOH. Semi-preparative HPLC purifications were performed on an
Agilent 1100 Series equipped with two pumps, an autosampler, a UV
detector, and a fraction collector. The column used for separations was a
3.3.1. Nudicauloside A (1)
White amorphous solid; [α D25
]
+25.7◦ (c 0.19, MeOH); IR (film) νmax
:
3307, 2942, 2831, 1449, 1416, 1113, 1021 cmꢀ 1; 1H and 13C NMR data,
see Tables 2 and 3; HRESIMS m/z 1097.5560 [M + Na]+ (calcd for
Kinetex XB-C18 (Phenomenex, 250 × 21.2 mm, 5 μm particle size).
53H86O22Na+ 1097.5503).
Solutions of HCOOH 0.1 % in H2O (solvent A) and HCOOH 0.1 % in
MeCN (solvent B) were used as eluents with a flow rate of 20 mL/min.
Optical rotations were measured in methanol at 589 nm using an
Autopol IV polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical). FTIR spectra
were recorded from a thin film of compounds deposited on a NaCl
windows, and using a Cary 630 instrument (Agilent Technologies).
Chiral separations of acetylated monosaccharides were performed on a
7890A GC-FID instrument (Agilent Technologies) using a Chiramix
C
3.3.2. Nudicauloside B (2)
White amorphous solid; [α D25
+16.4 (c 0.23, MeOH); IR (film) νmax
]
3354, 2941, 2878, 1745, 1160, 1073, 1028 cmꢀ 1; 1H and 13C NMR data,
see Tables 2 and 3; HRESIMS m/z 1259.6013 [M + Na]+ (calcd for
C
59H96O27Na+ 1259.6031).
column (GL Sciences, 30 m × 0.25 mm ×0.25 μm), and helium as the
3.3.3. Nudicauloside C (3)
carrier gas (flow 1 mL/min). The injector temperature was maintained
at 230 ◦C, while the GC oven was kept at 120 ◦C for 1 min and raised at a
rate of 4 ◦C/min up to 180 ◦C, which was held constant for 120 min.
NMR spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT-135, DQF-COSY, edited-HSQC, HMBC and
NOESY) were recorded on a 9.4 T instrument (400 MHz for 1H and
100 MHz for 13C), equipped with a QNP 5 mm probe (Bruker) or a
18.8 T instrument (800 MHz for 1H and 200 MHz for 13C), equipped
with a 5 mm triple resonance broadband cryoprobe (Bruker). Spectra
were acquired in pyridine-d5 or methanol-d4, and chemical shifts were
reported in ppm (δ) relative to the residual solvent peaks (Gottlieb et al.,
1997). All spectra were processed using MestReNova 12.0. High reso-
lution mass spectrometry was conducted on a 6210 Q-TOF spectrometer
(Agilent Technologies) equipped with an electrospray source operating
in the positive ion mode.
White amorphous solid; [α D25
]
+15.9◦ (c 0.41, MeOH); IR (film) νmax
3370, 2942, 2361, 1747, 1625, 1074, 1030 cmꢀ 1; 1H and 13C NMR data,
see Tables 2 and 3; HRESIMS m/z 1275.5978 [M + Na]+ (calcd for
C59H96O28Na+ 1275.5980).
3.4. Acid hydrolysis
Compounds 1–3 (3 mg of each) were refluxed in aqueous HCl (10 %
v/v, 10 mL) during 4 h. Aglycons were recovered with CHCl3 and the
aqueous layers were neutralized with N,N-dioctylmethylamine (10 % in
CHCl3). The sugar residues were acetylated with pyridine/acetic anhy-
dride (1:1, 2 mL) under agitation during 24 h. The monosaccharide
acetates were extracted with EtOAc (3 mL), and the organic fraction was
washed successively with sat. aqueous NaHCO3 (3 × 2 mL), H2SO4 20 %
(3 × 2 mL) and water (3 × 1 mL). The samples were subjected to chiral
GC-FID analysis and compared to retention times of monosaccharide
acetates synthesized from authentic samples.
3.2. Plant material
The leaves of Aralia nudicaulis L. were collected in June and July
◦
′
′′
◦
′
′′
`
´
2016, near Laterriere, Quebec, Canada (48 23 07 N, 71 25 07 W), and
dried in the shade. The plant was authenticated by Mr Patrick Nadeau
3.5. Pharmacological assays
´
´
´
`
(Departement des sciences fondamentales, Universite du Quebec a
Chicoutimi). A voucher specimen (No. QFA0297432) has been depos-
3.5.1. Cell culture
´
ited at the Louis-Marie herbarium of Laval University (Quebec).
Human skin fibroblasts (WS1, ATCC CRL-1502), human lung carci-
noma (A549, ATCC CCL-185), human colon adenocarcinoma (DLD-1,
187