Scheme 4a
ously noted, this procedure has the liability that large volumes
are required to dissolve all of the Oxone required for the
oxidation. A catalytic (10%) amount of Oxone along with
hydrogen peroxide resulted in only 60% conversion of the
alkylborane to the corresponding alcohol. This could have
been a result of the pH of the resulting solution, as the Oxone
mixture contains a stoichiometric amount of an acidic salt
(KHSO4), and a substoichiometric quantity of the reagent
was used. Using hydrogen peroxide under acidic conditions
(pH 2) did provide rapid oxidation of the alkylborane
intermediate without requiring the extended reaction times
at elevated temperature. This protocol required significantly
lower volumes of solvent to execute than did the Oxone
procedure. Other protocols for the oxidation of the B-C bond
led to lower yields and numerous byproducts.11
a Reaction conditions: a) SO3‚pyridine, DMSO, Et3N; b) MeNH2, NaH-
B(OAc)3, toluene, EtOH, THF, HOAc; c) HCl, EtOH, EtOAc.
and the flexibility to charge more reagent if the reaction does
not proceed to completion. Oxidation of alcohol 4 to ketone
8 was accomplished without first breaking the tosylate salt.15
After oxidation, the pH of the workup had to be carefully
controlled to maximize product recovery. When the aqueous
layer pH was kept around 10 with 25% ammonium hydrox-
ide, a 93% yield of product was extracted into toluene (HPLC
purity of 87%, with 6% of the methylthiomethyl ether as
the major contaminant16). Interestingly, the sulfate ester of
the cis-alcohol (cis-4) was identified in the aqueous phase
after workup, indicating a divergent reactivity pattern for this
diastereomer.17 The product from this step was carried into
the reductive amination crude as a toluene solution. Unre-
acted alcohol was always observed as a major impurity
(1-5%) from the oxidation, but this material readily purged
in the downstream chemistry (vide infra). After workup,
nitrogen was sparged through the organic phase containing
the ketone via an immersed tube at 50 °C for 1 h, and the
dimethyl sulfide was trapped in a bleach scrubber.18
A tosylate salt (4‚TsOH) was identified that allowed
isolation of the alcohol in high purity. Interestingly, formation
of the salt from product derived from the acidic hydrogen
peroxide oxidation generated a significant amount of hy-
drogen (∼1 mol equiv), while the material from the Oxone
oxidation evolved only small amounts of hydrogen in the
same salt-forming procedure. The salt is made by addition
of 1.1 equiv of p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate to the
product in acetone with seed crystal added to the acid
solution. Product thus obtained reproducibly had purity
higher than 99% in a yield of 80-90% for the transformation
of the olefin to the alcohol (four runs). The material isolated
from the hydroboration sequence was between 3.5:1 to 4.7:1
trans:cis.12
The Jones oxidation5 originally reported1 could be re-
placed with a Swern13 oxidation using either oxalyl chloride
or SO3‚pyridine14 as the activating agent (Scheme 4). On
scale, the SO3‚pyridine oxidation was selected due to the
noncryogenic reaction temperature, easier to handle reagents,
Several parameters were evaluated in an effort to optimize
the selectivity and reproducibility of the reductive amination.
In general, NaB(OAc)3H was found to be a more selective
reagent than NaBH4. On a laboratory scale, a cis:trans ratio
of 97:03 was obtained when 1.3 equiv of NaB(OAc)3H was
added to the imine, formed by treating the ketone with
methylamine (2 equiv, 2 M solution in THF) and acetic acid
(6) Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.-K.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6373-
6374. On attempting to invert the alcohol stereocenter using N-methyl-p-
nitrobenzenesulfonamide under Mitsunobu conditions, the five-membered
ring product was isolated. This was presumably formed via displacement
of the activated alcohol by the piperidine nitrogen followed by opening of
the aziridine at the less hindered position. This instability also made the
epoxide intermediate that would be derived from compound 3 unattractive
synthetically.
(15) Water in the starting alcohol was found to have a large effect on the yield
of the oxidation. For example, while material with 0.1% water content
provided a 99% conversion in the oxidation, material with 2% water only
went to 42% conversion under the same conditions. The free base could
be azeotropically dried more reproducibly than the salt. The salt could be
free-based in toluene with aqueous sodium hydroxide followed by distil-
lation of toluene and additional drying by stripping with two more additions
of toluene. This procedure gave 0.1-0.2% water levels in the bulk
reproducibly. For tosylate salt lots with sufficiently low water levels, no
free-basing was performed.
(7) (a) Oediger, H.; Joop, N. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1972, 764, 21-27.
(b) Oediger, H.; Moeller, F. German Patent DE 2101997, 1971. (c) Massiot,
G. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1990, 99, 717-728. (d) Keay, J. G. In
ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon: New
York, 1991; Vol. 8, Chapter 3.6.
(16) This structural assignment is based on 1HNMR and GC/MS (M ) 265).
(17) Structure assigned by 1HNMR coupling constants. This difference in
reactivity pathway might be attributed to intramolecular conjugate base
assistance of the piperidine nitrogen on the axially disposed alcohol in the
cis-alcohol. The possibility that this sulfate ester is produced by inversion
of an activated intermediate from the trans-alcohol is discounted on the
basis of the results discussed in ref 6. This finding seems to be distinct
from the faster oxidation of axial alcohols (of cyclohexanols) as compared
to equatorial alcohols observed in the literature in that it is a difference in
reaction mechanism as opposed to rate. (a) Eliel, E. L.; Schroeter, S. H.;
Brett, T. J.; Biros, F. J. Richter, J.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, S 1966,
88, 3327-3334. (b) Mueller, P.; Perlberger, J.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 8407-8413.
(8) (a) Brown, H. C. Tetrahedron 1961, 12, 117-138. (b) Brown, H. C.; Rao,
B. C. S. J. Org. Chem. 1957, 22, 1135-1136.
(9) Hutchins, R. O.; Learn, K.; Nazer, B.; Pytlewski, D.; Pelter, A. Org. Prep.
Proced. Int. 1984, 16, 337-372.
(10) Ripin, D. H. B.; Cai, W.; Brenek, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5817-
5819.
(11) The workup with alkaline hydrogen peroxide required refluxing for several
hours to consume the alkylborane. Also tried were trimethylamine N-oxide,
MCPBA, and sodium perborate.
(12) Based on 1H NMR analysis.
(13) Mancuso, A. J.; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 165-185.
(14) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. von E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5505-
5507.
(18) Liu, C.; Ng, J. S.; Behling, J. R.; Yen, C. H.; Campbell, A. L.; Fuzail, K.
S.; Yonan, E. E.; Mehrotra, D. V. Org. Process Res. DeV. 1997, 1, 45-54.
Vol. 7, No. 1, 2003 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
117