R. Kumar P. et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 7 (2004) 502–505
504
Fig. 1. ORTEP plot of the molecule [PdCl(L1)]. The atoms are drawn with 50% probability ellipsoids.
in idealized positions. Their isotropic thermal parame-
References
ters were taken as 1.2 times to that of the carbon atom
to which they were attached. Selected bond distances
and bond angles are given in Table 2 and the molecule is
displayed in the ORTEP diagram in Fig. 1.
[1] (a) A.K. Singh, V. Srivastava, J. Coord. Chem. 27 (1992) 237;
(b) A.K. Singh, S. Sharma, Coord. Chem. Rev. 209 (2000) 49.
[2] A.K. Singh, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 114 (2002)
357.
Additional material available from the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre comprises the final
atomic coordinates and thermal parameters for all
atoms and a complete listing of bond distances and
angles. The geometry around palladium is square
planar. The Pd–Te bond length in the present complex
[3] (a) E.G. Hope, W. Levason, Coord. Chem. Rev. 12 (1993) 109;
(b) W. Levason, D. Orchard, G. Reid, Coord. Chem. Rev. 225
(2002) 159;
(c) J.A. Barton, A.R.J. Genge, N.J. Hill, W. Levason, S.D.
Orchard, B. Patel, G. Reid, A.J. Ward, Heteroatom Chem. 13
(2002) 550.
[4] (a) J. Arnold, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 43 (1995) 353;
(b) P. Mathur, Adv. Organomet. Chem. 41 (1997) 243.
[5] A.K. Singh, V. Srivastava, Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon 47 (1990)
471.
ꢀ
2.504(1) A is shorter in comparison to earlier reports,
2.517(1) [12], 2.5873(2) [13] and 2.5865(2) to 2.6052(2)
ꢀ
A [14]. This appears due to combined effect of tri-
[6] L1H: Molecular weight. Calc.: 396.6. Found: 399.0. m.p. 82–83
dentate nature of hybrid organotellurium ligand and
the absence of strong trans influence in the present
complex molecule. The Pd–Cl bond distance 2.290(4)
°C. Anal.: Found: C, 51.26; H, 4.81; N, 3.16; Te, 31.86%; Calc. for
C
17H19NO2Te: C, 51.44; H, 4.82; N, 3.53; Te, 32.15%. NMR: 1H
(CDCl3, 25 °C): d (vs. TMS): 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.13 (t, 2H, H2),
3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.92 (t, 2H, H1), 6.76–6.82 (m, 3H, ArH m to
Te and H7), 6.945 (d, J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 1H, H9), 7.30–7.32, (m, 1H, H8),
7.505 (d, J ¼ 8:1 Hz, 1H, H6), 7.745 (d, J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 2H, ArH o to
Te), 16.00 (bs, 1H, OH); 13C{1H} (CDCl3, 25 °C): d (vs. TMS):
8.32 (CH3), 14.54 (C2), 50.87 (C1), 55.11 (OCH3), 99.67 (ArC–Te),
115.21 (ArC m to Te), 117.11 (C6), 118.63 (C8), 119.10 (C4), 127.97
(C9), 132.40 (C7), 141.34 (ArC o to Te), 159.90 (ArC–OCH3),
163.53 (C5), 171.38 (C3).
ꢀ
ꢀ
A is within the range of values 2.287(3)–2.352(3) A
reported for Pd(II) complexes of hybrid organotellu-
rium ligands [12–14]. The Pd–O bond lengths in the
ꢀ
present complex 2.03(1) A are consistent with the
ꢀ
range of values from 1.999(6) to 2.105(3) A reported
for five and six membered chelate rings containing Pd–
ꢀ
O bond [15,16]. The Pd–N bond distance 2.01(1) A is
close to the sum of the covalent radii of palladium and
[7] PdCl(L1)]: m.p. 162 °C. Anal.: Found: C, 37.48; H, 3.47; N, 2.43;
Te, 23.65%. Calc. for C17H18ClNO2PdTe: C, 37.97; H, 3.37; N,
2.60; Te, 23.80%. NMR; 1H (CDCl3, 25 °C): d (vs. TMS): 2.39 (s,
3H, CH3), 3.49 (t, 2H, H2), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.17 (t, 2H, H1),
6.61–6.66 (m, 3H, ArH m to Te and H7), 6.915 (d, J ¼ 8:7 Hz, 1H,
H9), 7.12–7.14 (m, 1H, H8), 7.335 (d, J ¼ 9:0 Hz, 1H, H6), 8.065
(d, J ¼ 9:0 Hz, 2H, ArH o to Te); 13C{1H} (CDCl3, 25 °C): d (vs.
TMS): 13.38 (CH3), 19.29 (C2), 62.76 (C1), 55.01 (OCH3), 102
(ArC–Te), 115.38 (ArC m to Te), 115.71 (C6), 120.86 (C8), 125.01
(C4), 127.68 (C9), 130.86 (C7), 138.58 (ArC o to Te), 159.90 (ArC–
OCH3), 163.53 (C5), 171.38 (C3). IR (KBr; cmꢁ1): m(Pd–Cl), 306;
m(Pd–N), 486.
ꢀ
nitrogen (ca. 2.02 A) suggesting strong coordination
through nitrogen. The bond angles at Te and N are
consistent with their nearly trigonal pyramidal
(89.2(4)–100.1(4)°) and trigonal planar geometry
(114(1)–123(1)°), respectively.
Acknowledgements
[8] DENZO data collection and processing software Z. Otwinowski,
W. Minor, Methods in enzymology, in: C.W. Carter Jr., R.M.
Sweet (Eds.), Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, vol. 276,
Academic Press, 1997, pp. 307–326.
AKS and RKP thank the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research (India) for financial support (Pro-
ject No. 01(1849)/03/EMR-II). M.B.H. thanks the UK
Engineering and Physical Sciences Council for support
of the X-ray facilities at Southampton. J.E.D. thanks
the University of Windsor for financial support.
[9] G.M. Sheldrick, Acta Cryst. A 46 (1990) 467.
[10] L.J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Cryst. 32 (1999) 837.
[11] G.M. Sheldrick, SHELXL 97, University of Gottingen, Germany.
[12] A. Khalid, A.K. Singh, Polyhedron 16 (1997) 33.