366
C. Cento et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 437 (2007) 360–366
orbed hydrogen amount is larger at higher temperature, and
larger is also the desorption rate.
increase of the activation energy of the process. It could be due
to some interaction of Ti with carbon that decreases the amount
of “active” titanium or reduces Ti mobility. As stated for non-
dopedsamples, thepresenceofcarbonondopedsamplesinhibits
the grain aggregation of NaAlH4.
4. Discussion
Beneficial effects in both hydrogen desorption rate and des-
orption temperature due to carbon presence have been detected
by different authors [6,8]. How the carbon could enhance the
alanate performance is anyway still an open question. Mor-
phological analysis shows that the aggregate structure of the
de-hydrogenated samples has been modified by carbon. The
presence of carbon produces rough particles. By examining
every single particle it is possible to observe that it is an aggre-
gation of particles of smaller diameter (few micron); anyway
X-ray spectra after de-hydrogenation show that no modification
occurred in the crystalline structure of alanate. The role of car-
bon could be more “physical” than “chemical” in the sense that it
modifies the grain surface of the de-hydrogenated phases prob-
ably due to the inhibition of grain aggregation. The increase of
the surface/volume ratio upon the first de-hydrogenation could
enhance the second de-hydrogenation step. This is in accordance
with the obtained results, which show that only the desorption
rate is improved by carbon addition, being the desorption tem-
perature and the hydrogen yield only slightly affected.
The effect of carbon to increase the hydrogen desorption rate
is noticeable for carbon content as high as 10 wt.%. By dou-
bling this amount only a slight change in the hydrogen rate
was observed. The amounts of hydrogen desorbed from 10 to
20 wt.% carbon added samples was almost the same. It is easy
to recognize a “threshold” behavior appearing when the car-
bon content lies between 5 and 10%. By considering that large
amount of dopant is detrimental in term of gravimetrical hydro-
gen density, the 10 wt.% sample can be considered the best
compromise between the de-hydrogenation rate and the hydro-
gen yield.
With respect to what previously found [9] our results pointed
out that the effect of carbon, independently from its allotropic
state, has beneficial effect on both Ti-doped or undoped NaAlH4
decomposition. The main differences between what has been
found by Wang et al. by adding graphite instead of high surface
carbon [9] and our results are in the lower decomposition tem-
perature; a very light effect on it should be ascribed to the ball
milling of the sample.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, the positive effect of carbon on hydrogen
absorbtion/desorption process has been shown. Carbon acts with
a threshold behavior and 10 wt.% carbon was found the best
carbon content. The 10% carbon sample, obtained by manual
mixing carbon and NaAlH4, showed to reversibly desorption of
hydrogen to 4 wt.% in the temperature range between 200 and
300 ◦C. The smaller grain size noted for carbon-doped materi-
als could enhance the rate of the second de-hydrogenation and
the following hydrogenation/de-hydrogenation steps. Syner-
gismwasfoundbetweencarbonandTiindouble-dopedsamples.
It follows that the two dopants act with different mechanisms.
The higher desorption temperature showed from Ti-doped sam-
ples mixed with carbon was related to a decrease of the amount
of available titanium.
References
[1] H. Imamura, K. Masanari, M. Kusuhara, H. Katsumoto, T. Sumi, Y. Sakata,
J. Alloys Compd. 386 (2005) 211–216.
[2] P. Chen, Z. Xiong, J. Luo, J.L. Lin, K.L. Tan, Nature 420 (2002) 302–304.
[3] B. Bogdanovic, M. Schwickardi, J. Alloys Compd. 253–254 (1997) 1.
[4] S.S. Srinivasan, H.W. Brinks, B.C. Hauback, D. Sun, C.M. Jensen, J. Alloys
Compd. 377 (2004) 283–289.
[5] G. Sandrock, K. Gross, G. Thomas, J. Alloys Compd. 339 (2002) 299–308.
[6] A. Zaluska, L. Zaluski, J.O. Strom-Olsen, J. Alloys Compd. 298 (2000)
125–134.
[7] J.M. Bellosta von Colbe, B. Bogdanovic, M. Felderhoff, A. Pommerin, F.
Schuth, J. Alloys Compd. 370 (2004) 104–109.
[8] D. Pukazhelvan, J. Alloys Compd. 403 (2005) 312–317.
[9] J. Wang, A.D. Ebner, T. Prozorov, R. Zidan, J.A. Ritter, J. Alloys Compd.
395 (2005) 252–262.
Also in Ti-doped materials the rate of the second de-
hydrogenation step is increased after carbon was added. As a
result the two desorption steps clearly visible in the Ti-doped
material, disappeared in presence of carbon (Figs. 12 and 13)
and a single desorption process was observed in carbon added
desorption step is slightly increased by increasing the amount
of carbon. This could be explained by considering that Ti-doped
samples are very sensitive to the amount of Ti used as cata-
lyst [5]. Carbon inhibits the effect of the titanium through an